Glad to see you have no answer to my actual points. Your script is really, really old. Are you a bot? 😂

STILL complaining... I mean... replying. LOL

It's all you really do on this forum ... look at your post history 😭 So you replied to basically say, "why are you complaining about my constant complaining?" Semantics aside, it's irritating. The game is clearly not what it used to be and besides, I only really check into the forum once in a while. And yet every time you and one other person are spouting negativity. Every. Single. Time. Yes, we all know the game is P2W and dying and Hazel is in it for the money. TO is a business after all. This has been known for years... I distinctly remember 4-6 years ago, when I was very active in this forum, you and this other individual were talking the exact SAME talking points. Seriously though, is this like some sort of sad hobby for you? So yes, it's irritating. It's tiring to hear the same thing over and over again for years. It's downright psychotic, really. Is it not in the forum rules that the whole purpose of criticism in this forum is such that it is constructive? Please correct me if I'm wrong. Of course it's valid. Everyone and their dog has known this for years. You keep banging on about it for years as well. It's stating the obvious and pretending there's any originality to your posts. It's funny that you think one of the most iconic and well-known video games in the world is for "kids and teenagers" but a 2d browser-based flash game from 2009. LOL. Yeah, we all know. And get a new script. You've been spouting the exact same for years. Telling me to "scroll past" or just ignore your posts doesn't refute any of my points, either.

One of my suggestions was to limit the number of F2P turrets/hulls to just 3 or 4 of them (each). After you paid a subscription (or per turret, or whatever) you'd get access to more of them.   But after you bought a 'subscription-turret/hull', you'd be playing with the P2W players and not the free players. I thought that was a good idea, but as I stated earlier, I don't know all the business aspects of tanki's income streams.

LOL. Ok, dude. I guess neither was I, LOL.   Since you weren't (complaining) replying to me, I didn't address them. And I ain't crying over any post on this forum. LOL.   I used to give constructive criticism. Years ago. Exactly zero of my ideas were implemented. My constructive criticism doesn't make tanki any money (see how that works?).   No one is in this specific thread for 'constructive criticism'. Including you. My criticism of tanki's pursuit of money remains valid, however. And if you go back far enough in this thread, you'll see this conversation started about imbalanced matchmaking and not money.   That wasn't the 'gotcha' you thought it was.