Jump to content
Forum Sections
-
Developers' Information
-
- 2 571
- posts
-
- 1
- post
-
- 178
- posts
-
-
General
-
- 3 380
- posts
-
- 29 503
- posts
-
- 9 436
- posts
-
Game Violation Reports (15,803 visits to this link)
-
-
Off-topic and Creativity
-
- 168
- posts
-
- 179
- posts
-
- 1 624
- post
-
- 18 124
- posts
-
-
eSports
-
Official eSports Website (10,841 visits to this link)
-
Official eSports Twitch Channel (10,405 visits to this link)
-
Official eSports Discord (10,384 visits to this link)
-
-
Special
-
- 1
- post
-
-
Who's Online 7 Members, 0 Anonymous, 649 Guests (See full list)
-
Topics
-
-
Posts
-
Yeah, I agree on that, on the paper the idea is great, but is it realistically possible? That's where things gets complex. Back to the game mode that also made me think about one more factor - so for example I remember Forest is no longer playable in ASL mode because as per the management decision it was removed. Say you end a match that was ASL mode, it means maps like Forest gets excluded by default just because of the mode. That's an example but I suppose that's not the only map that doesn't get a specific game mode, Rio doesn't get TJR mode for example, and so on...so we can't even start from the base where all maps should be treated the same when they don't all get the same playable mode available. This naturally reduces the poll of available maps and needs even more effort to produce to have a dynamic poll according to the mode of the map that ended. -
17400 effective hp I don't like the way you're trying to complicate the protection module by converting it into a weird additive formula. The game is reworking drones pretty soon, so do wait a bit more. Augment meta choice would increase further if players, especially those ones who rely on their fav defender+prot combo. As a result, dependency would increase for lifeguard and excelsior augments. Gap between augs will always stay, the game will maintain the powercreep and power difference between a legendary and a rare augment. I like that you want to balance protection modules, but this is not a standard way to go about it. Now if you said to simply cut module effectiveness from 50% protection to 25%, that would have been simpler. But the thing with this is, majority of the playerbase (that has spent a long time getting these expensive things maxed) will complain. TLDR: I'd say wait for the upcoming changes to suggest anything further. But imbalance in this game is pretty normal.
-
Doesn't work as there are many players who simply ignore the objectives/don't have the EQ to care for the objectives. This idea, if implemented, would frustrate players more.
-
1) This game does not have enough players to accommodate for this 2) The players the game does have, majority of them will only go for a mode they will profit on. 3) ASL is still a terrible map in many options, being on the attacking side is preferred by camping farmers. 4) Assumption made that many players queue on rather than wait for a bit. Some may want to change a combo because they were forced to change from their main starter ingame. 5) Voting systems will lead to more imbalanced games as if the map farmers wanted to play isn't selected, or yet anyone else didn't get the map they want. They will most likely leave. Are you going to implement leaving game penalties? As much as I would like that, the game would die a lot quicker than it is lasting. Misc: Were you about when the game implemented a prematch lobby where players joined and then the game started? If not, do see if there's any information about that. (It clearly didn't work due to the state of the game) Personal stance: Great idea, just not suitable for this games current state.
-
We could use speed boost and double armor at the same time a few days ago. I think it was a bug or something else ;( It was pretty nice to use meta version of trickster drone just like before
-
-
Community Management
No members to show
-
Administrators Online
-
Helpers Online
No members to show