-
Posts
1 398 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by JonathanBernatowicz
-
Well according to you it doesn't. Interesting. I'm curious to see if anybody else here thinks it does, but if it doesn't and Creationism does then Creationism certainly has the edge on a very important part of life. Extremely important. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. I'm not here to argue right now. I'm here to gather arguments. Please talk about the origin of life, without very many complicated words if you may. Also, would you agree that if there is no god, there is no purpose for life? While you may say it's just to have fun, there's ultimately no point in living life, am I right? For example Creationism believes that there is a point because when you die you will go to heaven ultimately and receive jewels for all the good deeds you've done and live a wonderful life there with our Lord and Savior. But if there is no god, if there is no heaven, then all there is is two dates, a beginning of your life and an end. Nothing else, really. Please correct me if I'm wrong, I'd like to see your point of view. Also, if there was life on earth, then wouldn't their be alien life forms on Mars? Life forms that would adapt to the temperature, air amount, and survive just like life forms did here? Again, I'm just gathering your arguments, please excuse me. To everyone! On Tuesday, February 4th a VERY interesting debate takes place. Bill Nye (The science guy, but a very smart and intelligent evolutionist) debates his points against Ken Ham (a very smart and intelligent Creationist). While I'm certainly not claiming that whoever wins their argument is correct because in many debates I know that to not be true, but it will be...interesting if you may agree with me here to see this particular debate.
-
Players, unless they're noobs. But the dev team that passed on was pro.
-
Three pros in this picture (MMM, Reda, BuddyGuy) and one noob (meh) BuddyGuy don't like me ok
-
Inviting friends to battles is even easier now!
JonathanBernatowicz replied to semyonkirov in News Archive
lol, on my iPhone if I click on the "X" next to its suggestion for what it wants it to be, it'll never suggest it again and let me freely type "Tanki" without a problem :) -
Discount on hulls this Friday, January 24
JonathanBernatowicz replied to semyonkirov in News Archive
Congratulations :) I knew you could do it ;) -
That is a good idea. People who get chosen: Please accept all requests so people can have trust in you. If I get chosen personally, I would accept any and all requests, then after the battle I'd make a list of the friends I accepted and delete them as I wish.
-
Tanki Online Photoshop Contest — Discussion
JonathanBernatowicz replied to semyonkirov in Contests Archive
Edit it to say "~deleted~" or something of the sort. -
Any scores?
-
Discount on hulls this Friday, January 24
JonathanBernatowicz replied to semyonkirov in News Archive
I believe players are just wanting faster hulls because, well, they're faster and more fun. But, if you isist on this unintentional result, then wouldn't Titan be worse? After all, players were all saying that Titan is buffed and Mammoth is nerfed. Why then was Titan last, and not Mammoth? That's the main question here. -
Discount on hulls this Friday, January 24
JonathanBernatowicz replied to semyonkirov in News Archive
First of all, I'm sure that many players (such as.....someone I know) wanted m2 and m3 Hornet not just m1. Why give the players a different discount if we voted for Hornet? We don't care about the price! We want Hornet! We want Hornet! We want Hornet to be cheap! Viking can be 35% but we, we, we, we, as the players, wanted Hornet to be 50%. 50% is not useless for higher ranks that are not at the m1 stage. That's a lie. I know someone who desperately wants Hornet m3. I know someone who wants Hornet m2. So, if they voted for it along with thousands of other players, why give them someone else? I love balance too, but Hornet on a 50% discount helps the majority because the majority like Hornet. We as the players like Hornet. We as the players want to get the hull we love on a 50% discount and be satisfied. We as the 40% of players want this. So because the 40% dominates the 20% (estimates here) more players will be happy. -
Discount on hulls this Friday, January 24
JonathanBernatowicz replied to semyonkirov in News Archive
Maybe true but all registered players did not vote, so we really have no idea how many votes there'd be for Viking. All the world? You do realize that only 10% of the world can get on a computer if the first place, don't you? You speak of fair vote? It doesn't look like it as you're saying that even though around 3k more voters voted for Hornet they should not give it a 50% discount. Be happy--Viking came in 2nd out of 7 hulls and will get a 35% discount. There's no problem here. -
Yeah that was another one of my guesses :P
-
Discount on hulls this Friday, January 24
JonathanBernatowicz replied to semyonkirov in News Archive
Yes, but most people wanted Hornet to have a 50% sale. NOT Viking. So, should they give Viking a 50% just because it's more expensive? Not by any means. They should give us a Hornet sale because that's what we asked for. If we wanted Viking, then we should have put more votes in. But Hornet clogged up about 40% of the votes so a lot of players wanted it. -
Yes, you would think. However 2 (probably pro but nevertheless) low-ranked tandem both Second Lieutenants (2 Diamonds) fought and won against two high-ranked developers. I forgot the exact rank of those developers but they were both above Second Lieutenant and one of them was a Colonel or Lieutenant Colonel.
-
Discount on hulls this Friday, January 24
JonathanBernatowicz replied to semyonkirov in News Archive
Copy/Paste? Anyways, Tanki may want to know the most/least popular hulls in the game. Also, they do indeed want to please the players, so if a sale could be known to help the majority then great. Many players voted for Hornet. Almost 50% in this community, almost 50% in the Russian community, and about 35% in the German community. This sale doesn't really matter to me. I have m2 Hornet, m1 Viking, and m1 Wasp already. I'm up to date other than product kits, which sales don't matter to them anyways as everything in a product kit is already 50% off. -
2-0? Two touchdowns to 0, thus meaning the final score is 14-0? Or two field goals to 0 thus meaning the final score is 6-0? Or litterally the score 2-0 which would mean the Broncos only scored a "Safety" all game and the Seahawks scored nothing on offense as well. And yes it was lol! He later apologized about it in an essay which was interesting.
-
You don't have that....everyday?
-
For the rest of your days :wub:
-
The Superbowl Predictions
JonathanBernatowicz replied to JonathanBernatowicz in The Superbowl Predictions Archive
I'm in fact surprised this has not been made as a topic already, but since it hasn't and I'm huge NFL fan I thought I'd make it. With one and a half weeks to go (February 2nd is the date) here we are. The Superbowl is a huge National Football League (NFL) event that appears each year even internationally. Commercials beg to be on the Superbowl, Americans of all ages can't wait, and the Superbowl has pushed the line beyond American's borders. The NFL typically claims the number of people able to watch the game is around 1 billion in over 200 countries. 2012's Superbowl XLVI holds the record for total number of U.S. viewers, attracting an average U.S. audience of over 111 million, and an estimated total of nearly 167 million (worldwide), making the game the most-viewed television broadcast of any kind in American history. (The previous two sentences were taken from Wikipedia, though both have sources) The Superbowl typically has a lot of hype, and this year is no exception. The Denver Broncos (as the AFC champion) have a very superb offense, the arguably the best in league history. Peyton Manning, also arguably the best Quarterback in league history, leads them and the Broncos shed records in both most amount of points scored (606) and most amount of touchdowns thrown/received (55) this season. Their better than average defense also doesn't put them in too much of a hole. Meanwhile the Seattle Seahawks (as the NFC champion) are exactly the opposite. They have a superb defense, and while they didn't break any records, their defense has been one of the best in a long time. With all-star Cornerback and Safety Richard Sherman and Earl Thomas, the Seahawks lead the league in interceptions by a huge margin of 8. That equipped with a great defensive line is what makes this defense great. Just as the Broncos have a better than average defense, the Seahawks have a better than average offense with Running Back Marshawn Lynch being 6th in the league in yards and tied for first in the league for touchdowns. He will have a competition though, as the Broncos defense was the 7th best in terms of rushing yards allowed. Along with all that, this Superbowl is played in cold New Jersey where not only weather, but wind could be a potential factor. If you have any questions regarding the game you may feel free ask them here ;) If you think I have something to add you may PM me or also ask them here! So my question to you guys is, who will win and what's the score? I will decipher the top 3 (top 5 or more if this topic gets so many posts) closest predictions after the Superbowl. You may change your prediction as many times as you want up to the Superbowl's starting date. Predictions that were edited/made after the Superbowl starts will be disqualified. Multiple predictions will also be disqualified. My prediction is that the Denver Broncos win the game 24-20. What's yours? -
While it has no chance at winning, it has a chance at getting 5th. The only one that is not currently in the top-3 and has a chance is Dictator. In fact, in the German community, Dictator is 3rd and Wasp is 4th. So the players in that community like Dictator more than Wasp as third. Many of them will probably be upset when Wasp gets the 20% discount just like how the English community got upset when it was Isida rather than Railgun.
-
There are some special avatars like that and the one of
-
I agree it was so high, but how can you measure that into a unit? In other words, what "length" is that? You have no idea exactly what meters are in Tanki. So, noone could technically qualify to beat you other than the fact that you can make direct but yet not complete observations. So, if someone had a jump of almost that height, what's the factor?
-
lol On topic, I like cats and have three of them at my house. They can be cute, and are very soft.
-
I have no idea what unit you could use for height, but as for length according to my calculations the length of the jump is 16 Hornets--from side to side. Not long-ways.
-
Current votes for all communities 1st place: Hornet--7,010 votes 2nd place: Viking--4,400 votes 3rd place: Wasp--1,704 votes 4th place: Dictator--1,097 votes 5th place: Mammoth--803 votes 6th place: Hunter--794 votes 7th place: Titan--670 votes The places have stayed the same ever since I did this just around 5 hours ago. Hornet, Viking, Wasp, Dictator, Mammoth, Hunter, then Titan. However, it has been a tight race between Mammoth and Hunter for that 5th/6th place spot, and Mammoth has pulled out ahead every one of them. It will be interesting to see the end result. Will Hunter be 5th, or will it @Remaine Mammoth? That is the question soon to be discovered. I doubt Dictator will pull ahead of Wasp, but there is a chance Dictator can get 600 votes and take that 20% discount.