I'm not saying it's against the Game Rules, you need to read what I'm saying. I am saying that because the opponent drugs like crazy in the last 2 minutes why should that give them the win when the other team dominates most of the game. I'm saying you need to calm down and justify your case appropriately and not spit back fire. If you're going to debate, do it like a man, not a twelve-year-old child. Except, that is still possible. The larger your lead is the quicker your score goes down I have noticed and the quicker THEIR score goes up. I get they want to make it fair, so that each battle goes down to the wire, but do they really have to make it so that even if you are one point away from winning (again, hypothetically speaking) with two minutes to go or even 90 seconds that your lead can be diminished and despite your effort throughout the battle, you still lose in the last 90 seconds? Wouldn't it just be better to end the battle earlier if the opponent is getting beat really badly? I highly recommend using good grammar then :) or at least so that what you are saying is more understandable.

1. So the team that dominates most of the game just doesn't get any credit because their opponent started drugging like crazy and capturing the point? At least make the crystal rule fair then, so the team that dominates 13 minutes of the game isn't stuck with 12 crystals and 700 points (hypothetically speaking) 2. You really need to calm down. I'm not telling you where to write, I'm saying that you should chill, because your attitude isn't appreciated here. If you can't have a simple discussion without turning it into an argument, then I recommend you see a psychiatrist or someone that can help you. 3. I highly recommend you visit this website: http://www.grammarbook.com/

So then playing Control Points is pointless then? It doesn't matter how good you are for a majority of the match, if one team starts to drug and win with 120 seconds to go it's possible? Now I see why I left Tanki the first time...

No, we didn't stop playing completely, you are misunderstanding. The opposing team attacked all at once at got the point. But they shouldn't be able to win in two minutes when we had the lead for thirteen. It just shows that you can sit there for practically the entire battle and do nothing and then with two minutes to go swoop in and win. It's unfair and I suggest if you are going to use that attitude with me you go take out your aggressions elsewhere.

It shouldn't matter though, the dominant team through thirteen minutes tried harder and yet they still don't win because they lost practically a point every three seconds while their opponent gained one every five seconds for the past two minutes? It doesn't seem like the better team wins in that case.

Could you explain? I mean it really is unfair the way a team that's trailing by 50 can make a miraculous comeback and win in the final two minutes of the battle while the team that deserved to win was leading a majority of the time for the other thirteen twenty-eight or even fifty-eight minutes.

Hello fellow Tanki members, Recently I partook in a Control Points battle in the Polygon map and noticed that we were trailing with 30 seconds to go after leading around 85-90% of the match. I believe that this new Control Points format in which the team without the point loses points is unfair and is getting in the way of those of us who rightfully win Control Points battles. I understand not wanting the other team to leave, but when the lead can be reversed in a matter of seconds after leading by over 30 points, it becomes a bit ridiculous. I'm hoping that others can agree with me that this style of play is not rewarding those who try their hardest for the entirety of the battle, but rather those who try their hardest in the last few minutes and are mediocre the rest. I included a poll for others to express their opinion and decide whether or not this style of play in Control Points should be revoked or kept the way it is. Thank you for your time, I'm hoping that this issue is handled with appropriately and is not overlooked. I believe that making it so people don't quit when they are losing is fine, but doing this is taking it to an extreme. Thanks again, -tony990_Superstar

I don't understand how people can think Germany will win this year. I mean, sure they have Manuel Neuer, but other than that... Giroud > Ozil Pogba > Draxler Kante > Schweinsteiger Just because they won 2 years ago doesn't mean they are capable of winning this time.

Don't mind me, reviving this topic again because I'm back (sort of) if I can find any match to do commentary on.

31

Yes Summer?

Player mohana12345 has been banned for a day. Reason: Deliberate inaction, helping the opposing team, against your own team, conspiracy with the players of the opposing team (sabotage) Reported to the tech support

27 189

25

I don't.

I know, I was making a joke :P

People would get to express their opinion, *************************************************************************

When people say "noob" it means "Noobest" like the old team which then translates to "New best," so that means if someone calls you a noob then you are the new best player :)

You say you will stop arguing, yet you continue to reply to this topic and debate, showing that you are still arguing. Are you incompetent with yourself? It appears so, as you think that because you are a member of a lousy group in a game that not many people have heard of that you are unstoppable and that nobody can win an argument with you. Obviously homeschooling hasn't taught you anything about English, because yours is dreadful. And, I seriously doubt that one of your cousins went to college at age 13, because then they would have had to start high school by 10 at the latest, which is 5 grades ahead of where everybody else stands. If that actually happened, it would have been on the news, so until you provide me with that article you have no proof, therefore your argument is invalid. No, they are not "smarter than me." They are merely confused because they, and you, do not know how to respond to what I am saying. You are trying to tell me that homeschooling kids is better than sending them to a real school, which is a social environment that teaches life skills and doesn't spoil you. You get to pick the hours you want to do your schooling, correct? Unless you are getting a job as a writer, you most likely won't get to pick your own hours, and the only way to be experienced with not being able to pick your own hours is going to a real school. Arguing with home-schooled kids is like arguing with a wall, no matter what you say, even if it makes sense, they will not even consider what you are saying.

Yes, I do hate the Press members, because, I am right. You let a silly little club make you scream and cry and try to do anything you could to get us to stop, and when you succeeded let me guess...you threw a party? Probably, and you say I am conceited? You should really go to a real school, they might teach you something.

OK let me give you one big reason why public and private education is better than homeschooling: When one gets a job, it will most likely involve working with others. Homeschooling is antisocial and does not teach you how to work with other people, which will hurt you in the long run. If you do not know how to work with other people as an adult, how do you expect to get a job? Unless you are working as a mailman, work in the animal care field or service working field for the entirety of your adulthood, homeschooling isn't going to get you where you want to be.

But, isn't "your home a school"? Exactly. Point proven.

Typical "Press" member trying to show off again...yes they teach me much here more than they ever taught you in the 8 years it took you to complete high school.

Probably not, and I don't go to a public school, I go to a private school. You know, one of those schools that you have to pass a test to get into. You probably wouldn't know what that is, being home schooled you live under a rock

No, your home is not a school. A school has a school board. Does your home have a school board? No it does not. Your online network is a homeschool program. It does not make your home a school. And yes, I am on Google Maps, I was walking my dog when the Google car went by. I looked up my address a few months later and there I was.