Vote here: http://en.tankiforum.com/index.php?showtopic=350522

Loss of gyroscope effect (1 -> 0.5) Loss of firing angle (vertical/horizontal) Weak damage increased (25% -> 50%)

I don't think I was rude. I played hundreds of hours with Vulcan. I think I have bigger knowledge about the turret than you. I still think it was a nerf. My performance dropped on most maps and game modes (I'm still good, I don't say it's garbage now). But lets see what the other Vulcan players think about it. I'll create a poll.

Another good point. With Railgun on my other account I can move my tank forward-backward when I want to shoot in a bigger vertical angle. The same applies to Smoky, Thunder, etc.

And what did they say? Did they prefer the new Vulcan? I doubt it. I don't really care about horizontal auto-aim. I need the vertical one. It's not an aiming problem, it's about what I am and what I'm not able to shoot. It's much harder to play on maps with lots of high and low ground. Like Polygon which I play quite a lot. And no, Vulcan isn't OP on Polygon since the December update. But since this update I can barely see any Vulcan player except myself. The gyroscope effect nerf is not a big problem for me but it's still a nerf. And try playing with a light hull (+ Vulcan)...

"Overall, I believe this update was beneficial for Vulcan, and the positives outweigh the negatives." Yeah, it wasn't. I say this as a daily Vulcan user. The gyro loss is awful, the firing angle loss is noticeable. The weak damage buff is good but overall it's a nerf. Ask any Vulcan player if he/she prefers the current or the previous version.

I don't think it was a bad experience even if it had obvious flaws. I'm glad the developers try to change things about the drug system. It's really necessary. I'm looking forward to the next experience. And you all need to be constructive. It's okay to criticize a change but be reasonable and respect other's opinions.

I play Hunter-Railgun on my alt. Your point?

I kill enemies with 234 all day without any drugs. It's not like it's impossible.

Do you have any particular reasons? ;)

Why is it bad?

Yeah, that's the problem. I think buyers shouldn't have that much advantage. Btw, I bought already in this game, I'm not a non-buyer. I just don't buy a lot.

Test battle: It was great. I have enough supplies to drug tactically when I need. Buyers still have an advantage (RK), but the gap should be much smaller than it was before.

I'll be the Prime Minister.

Well then they're just dumb. You can fight when you can't use any of them and help your team.

My idea was that the default setting should be drugs-off when creating a Pro battle. A lot of people are just lazy and they don't click on the supplies-off checkbox even if they prefer that game mode.

One thing which I liked very much: No player made 3-5x as much XP as the next couple of players. It was fairly balanced.

A very good strategy if you want to lose and earn less crystals. Congratulations for the brilliant idea.

Come on, druggers... Figure out a better solution to reduce the gap between druggers and non-druggers if you don't like this. Or stop whining.

Your team will lose though if you play only 1/3 of the time.

I just played a friendly fire Stadium CTF. I think my own teammates killed me more than the enemy while carrying the flag. It's a terrible option. Most players just aren't mature enough not to shoot anyone in the same team. It should be completely removed or at least give some penalty to those who kill their teammates.

Poor buyers. I feel bad for them. :lol: