That's what I thought, hence the question... Well, either way, results are coming real soon, so I guess won't bother them anymore :P

Hammer OP for flag rushes :mellow:

Ask Jade next time :l

I'll be miniswift :3 Less edits Try using more special mechanics like handstands ​Other than that I thought the video was great, but only because I was in it :3

Okay.. I'll figure it out eventually, everyone has a different writing style :l you saw nothing

someone hide their post and screw him over

Just put an emote limit of 3. Perfectly doable and reasonable.

Makes sense :0 Wait whose alt are you?

Aww, I'm not a distinguished member? :mellow: By the way, Gnat and Lolkiller should be added to the list of ex-members

:lol:

I heavily doubt that'll happen, as people already complained about getting used to a permanent delay change; how would they react to having to change timing 3-4 times a game?

Are the results coming out with the release of July's newspaper or earlier?

I understand that, but next time, try to keep your criticism positive. e.g. "I really hated that guide, it was so pointless and didn't even teach anything" is not a useful criticism. All the person gets is that you hate their writing, and that's bound to put them on their guard. "I think that guide wasn't very useful. You should make the guide more in depth and less situational, but it's good that you're trying to write in a new style" is useful and will also build the other person up.

Tanki X :ph34r:

This isn't exactly constructive criticism. You can criticise, but you don't need to instigate fights by insulting the people who take time out of their day to improve the Tanki community and write for a game, just for the sake of those random people spread across the globe.

My alt is spelled Totai_Skiil, that's probably why it's not showing up :P

I don't think anyone was offended by your comments until you started insulting the reporter team's abilities.

Never, I'm a wannabe News Rep ok nub? :L

Alright, let me try to explain the current situation. You, a solitary tanker out of the roughly 20-25 who read and comment on the Newspaper, complained that guides were too simple and easy to write. Your vote makes up roughly 1/20 of the audience. The other 19/20 is perfectly fine with guides, but somehow you translated that into everyone hating on your opinion. This made you toxic, which led to the entire standoff/fight. It's perfectly fine to post your opinion, but you got rather toxic about it, which wasn't fine.

That'd be great :) The link to our server is on the first page.

Hmm... The review is exactly what it should be: a clear opinion with hard facts to support your cause. That said, I would recommend writing guides rather than reviews. Reviews are rather short, but with guides, you can expand on how to use the aforementioned object. I typically start off a guide with a small section on why the turret is good, and then expand on why it is good or how you can use the turret's pros to your advantage, while teaching how to minimise the situations where the cons will be exposed. Basically: Short review of pros and cons, then show how you can maximise use of pros and minimise the object's cons being exposed. If you figure that out, you essentially have already finished your guide.