simple solution make a limit to how many supplies can be used in a battle (apart from drops) 15 minute battle = 15 supplies total that would calm down the serial druggers

Wouldn't it have been better if the zero supply feature actually did that i.e. cancelled out the use of suppliers for a fixed period (40secs like supplies) which would rob the druggers of their advantages and would force them to rely of skills until the effect timed out. naming a function that gives you and your mates all supplies, "Zero ?Supply" seems a bit of a misnomer

mission exploitation... more like player exploitation. :angry:

it was.... crap

and therein lies the problem. Win-buying druggers encouraging the devs to add more ways to buy victory. I really don't understand these sad bullies, there can't be any satisfaction in winning that way. Maybe they like hitting kids too.

This is getting silly. The Devs are stumbling from one 'balls up' to another overcompensating like a clueless driver in a skid. Eventually they will wreck the game permanently. The unfortunate thing is that these cretins will then move to another game and start to wreck that as well.

"You could just try to leave the battle and join another one," - is one of the most stupid statements I have heard on here in a long time. How can one join another one when there are only ever a handful of non pro (system generated) battles available at any time? Bearing in mind that there may be a mission constraint on the type that must be played e.g gain 500 exp in a CTF battle which limits the number along with unsuitable rank ranges. We are not playing on here just to be buyer or drugger cannon fodder. Make it possible to generate customisable non pro battles but take out the easy cheat daily missions. Take off those rose tinted specs Flexoo, lay off the wacky baccy for a while and see whats really happening to this game.

Hmmm only 11221 players tonight - yes I can see how the recent updates have boosted participation. This game is dying on its feet and the Devs are determined to deliver the coup de grace.

Come on Cedric - own up and answer everyone's concerns on here. We are all big boys (and girls) so tell us straight, has Tanki finally adopted the pay to win strategy that we all suspect?

not enough non pro games of various rank levels out there . I do not intend joining a game 7 ranks lower than the top level just to be easy target practice for high rank druggers. Tanki get your fingers out,. you changed the rule to non pro battles only for daily missions now you have to provide enough for all players to compete in.

You need to collect evidence. The best proof is a video which clearly shows the violation. Quality of the video must allow moderators to easily understand nicknames and ranks of all the players. Before the creation of the post read *** GAME VIOLATORS SECTION RULES ***

Question - when will this useless crew of devs finally get the sack?

SG97 don't feed the Troll (Shafter). no one could really be as stupid or as naïve as shafter pretends to be. He/She is just an attention whore seeking a fleeting moment of glory.

Its simple you people - STOP PAYING MONEY TO THEM.

Shafter9 - nice trolling attempt - not falling for it though. Shame on you. <_<

So at last the Devs have proved that one can in fact polish a turd ! :angry: They take away another chunk of my earning stream by reducing the probability of getting a crystal mission and also put up the price of changes. I fear that I am repeating myself but - DEVS YOU ARE BAD - REMOVE YOUR HEADS FROM YOUR REARS AND COME INTO THE REAL WORLD.

no name - don't see that happening soon as the Devs are too busy forming circles to pat each others backs for what they see as a job well done! <_< I think that they should rename Tanki Online to the Chuckle Brothers School for Clowns and Gaming Company.

Simple Redlinezak - to tanki good idea = money maker.

If you seriously want to control druggers and encourage skilful play then limit the number of supplies that can be brought into a battle e.g 10x each DD, DA etc. Set the daily missions to include scores from pro battles but exclude 1v1 & short battles / add minimum targets e.g. kills or exp to stop abuse. How about adding a queueing system to get into battles.

You've all seen the vlog by now. They don't give a crap about us. they will not change until they see a revenue drop. PLEASE DONT PAY REAL MONEY FOR ANYTHING UNTIL THEY SORT THIS BALLS-UP OUT. Hit them in the pocket, it's the only language that they will listen to.

So these "improvements"? 13755 crystals (with discount) for shaft MU then 3 days 19 hours waiting time or 27.5k crystals to speed up..... Yes I can see how this is a great improvement..... BTW you thick Ruskies that's pure English sarcasm with just a hint of bile. You utter Bellends !!!! Re - posted as the original mysteriously seems to have got lost somewhere in Tankiland

so these "improvements" 13755 crystals (with discount) for shaft MU then 3days 19 hours waiting time or 27.5k crystals to speed up..... Yes I can see how this is a great improvement..... BTW you thick Ruskies that's pure English sarcasm with just a hint of bile. bellends !!!

just did the same myself Aster. BTW how the hell are we supposed to compete 1st & 2nd lieut vs major generals? The rank bracket is too large especially with no choice of battles to join. I often try to join 1 or 2 ranks below the upper level as a challenge but being 5 or 6 ranks down is too much for battles that are now almost compulsory if you want to complete a daily mission. Either give us the ability to create non pro battles ( with restrictions to stop the 1 flag loopholes etc) or provide a decent spread of battles suitable for all ranks and tank combos.

the evidence is overwhelming..... NOT GOOD

next they will say it was all just an April fool prank or "it was all just a dream" etc then reset the clock up and claim it as a vast improvement. No one there will have the balls to stand up and say " sorry players, we got it wrong". I just hope it costs them a shed load of cash in lost revenue when people stop playing.