:o So it's true, teachers DO play video games. :P

All the hackers I've seen have been such noobs that they fail and are so easy to kill even when they hack. Also they can just be reported and blocked, after the battle of course. Druggers tend to be the most annoying for me, considering I really hate wasting crystals to drug back. But a drugging hacker...... :wacko:

I would make an option to filter battles by rank.

I had Hornet m3 before rb, back in the days where many times rank didn't matter equipment-wise.

I'm glad we could finally come to agree over something, however, the developers will have to add this if they wanted, and for all we know, they might not want to potentially waste their time.

No, I didn't mean that, I personally agree that topics made every time someone is unhappy with his/her ban are wrong, however, I still think that players should be able to at least show what they think of mods without needing to discuss their actions. If mods weren't shown by the community if they made a controversial decision, wouldn't they eventually be able to become corrupt? I know that other mods and people higher than them are able to tell them, but they would most likely become friends after some time, becoming biased and making the reprimand/notification less strict or nonexistent. Semyon said that the voting system was created to show players' opinions about different things, so why not allow players, many of which would be able to give honest, helpful opinions, to show their opinions on the administration's choice over mods?

By "answered" do you mean using this? Because if mods don't care about being thumbed-down over people unhappy with their bans, which you stated with this, Then why is the rule there if the people the rule is protecting don't care if what the rule protects them against happens to them?

Yeah, those introduction battles were fun :).

If mods don't care about trolling or angry people voting down their posts, then that reason against allowing players to vote posts of mods become invalid, unless for some reason aren't often making the correct decisions, or if the tanki developers care so much about the reputation of their mods' posts (which I find rather improbable), so I ask again, what's the point of not allowing players to vote the posts of a mod up or down?

So because of the actions some people who decide to troll on the voting system and some others who think that they shouldn't have been banned, the entire rest of the community, which could very well be people completely capable of giving good ideas and helpful insights, is unable to share their opinions on mods in the simple way of voting up or down a post? Also, you still didn't answer why a mod would care whether they are voted up or down if they made the correct decision according to the rules.

You did not answer my question. Yes I know this is true, but as kool said, if a mod has made the completely correct decision according to the rules, why on Earth should they care?

If that's the case, then what about people who just do that to other players? If it truly is stupid, then why was the votes system introduced in the first place?

Well done, its a sad fact though, that the community won't be able to read the sequel due to you speaking up about your opinion. :(

Hilarious as always, it will be sad that we will no longer be seeing official articles from you anymore Goldrock :(

What actually is the point of the community not being able to vote up or down the posts of mods? Does it actually do anything to help? Or is it just to protect the pride that mods might have seeing the community unable to express their opinion on a potentially controversial topic? When tanki extended their game to english-speaking people, they should've realized that they would be receiving many players from the US and other countries where free speech is allowed and encouraged, and should've realized that there would be many people from such countries that would feel compelled to express their opinions over controversial topics, even if they break controversial rules. It's obvious though that the tanki administration is stubbornly against abolishing rule 2.18, contrary to many players' opinions and ideas. So at least let the community vote up or down a mod's posts, how much harm would it do? In fact, I saw many mods post that they "did not care about it" for it was "just a number" or that "they didn't care at all" if people angry at them would vote their post down. So why not? What harm could it do to the incredibly undemocratic society known as the tanki english moderators?

Thunder, then wasp, smoky, or firebird

Or I haven't seen anything bad, yet.

Ur a great addition to the community, helpful, polite, and your blog site is both useful and hilarious.

Being in the group titled "Ban" means that he violated a rule in the forum and has been disconnected from talking in the game chat and posting on the forum for however long the period of the ban is, which is specified in the edited post of his ban. To find it you can try clicking the "find content" button on his profile, or you can PM a moderator, but try not to make public topics about it.

Don't listen to a single thing this guy just said, they'll get you banned many times. My tips are to never post in the violators section unless you found a hacker and have proof of it, then make a new topic with the evidence. Don't create topics asking for advice on what weapons/hulls/paints you should get, post those questions in the What to Buy, What to Use topic at the top of the Gameplay section of the forum. If you get banned and don't know why, PM a moderator, don't post a new topic asking it, it'll get you or your alternate account banned again. Be polite and helpful when possible. Make friends and have fun! :)

No, I actually did my own test, unless you also decided to set the border's of your command prompt and other windows as neon green. Also, notice the small differences in the size of the pictures and position of the text in both pictures.

It's okay, not bad, but not necessarily good, at major, although you'll obviously be outgunned by the numerous thunder m2's.

I'm just starting high school, secondary school I think in European countries, currently my best subject is math, or maths in other countries (#USAIsSoDifferentSometimes), I'm not sure what I'll study in the future, but as of right now, I'm able to make some money teaching chess to inexperienced to intermediate players :D.

You can log out and then log back in on a different account, if that's your question.

Personally, I haven't had any trouble with PMs with mods, the one time in now not so recent history when I was banned for a week I PMed FBI and I received an answer showing why I was banned in a matter of hours, although he was quite blunt over it :D. However, I agree, the main difference I see in the forum between a year ago and now is that there are many more closed topics, and there aren't nearly as many good discussions.