Railgun Vs Thunder

[DJHerobrine1 12]

just read the first page, truthteller is right.

Why must you criticize ? This is one of my first topics. You are just complaining please stop.

[thunderousrailgunner 1,934]

I Think Are Both Are Equal.
They Both Are Great In Their Own Scenarios .

[RicoGod 1,832]

Rico beats all :P

[LiquidGold 1,370]

railgun is played by people with something to prove ... that's why I don't have it 

[Promissory 569]

I love both, I have M3 thunder and m2 railgun, that'll become M3 asap :ph34r:

[Lord-of-the-Snipers 1,620]

Love both too.

 

In DM and CP however I almost always choose the Thunder.

It 's better in self-defense because of the faster reload and IMO nothing

beats the versatility of the Splash damage.

 

Probably around 2/3 or 3/4 of my shots fired with Thunder are aimed at the opponent(s) hull(s) itself.

The other 1/3 or 1/4 of the shots are Splash-damaging on obstacles, walls,

the ground, just dead tanks etc.

(Ofcourse, I didn 't count the missed ones ;) )

 

Rail is great, but does IMO a better job with the "security" of a supporting team around you.

So In TDM and DM 's CTF 's I pick both Rail or Thunder, not a real preference here.

 

edit: mistakingly wrote DM instead of CTF

Edited January 31, 2015 by Lord-of-the-Snipers

[Langlas 11]

Depends, I prefer rail in Mid-Large maps that have good cover. If you pick the right position you can dominate with rail. Thunder has splash damage and lacks a tracer, but it also has to expose itself more often. It is also important to consider your aiming skills and frequency of use. Thunder has a much faster reload so missing a shot doesn't usually have the same effect as missing with rail, where every hit counts.

[Loackie 269]

Why must you criticize ? This is one of my first topics. You are just complaining please stop.

so i'm not allowed to have my own opinion? that's a bit shrewd.

[DJHerobrine1 12]

Did I say that? I never said that you could not have a opinion. I just don't like being criticized when i am trying

[DJHerobrine1 12]

If it's mean please don't share it that's all.

[pizzaslad 471]

Let's go to a Polygon CP and compare :)

[Loackie 269]

Did I say that? I never said that you could not have a opinion. I just don't like being criticized when i am trying

Truthteller's comment may have been cruel, but i do agree with the fact both weapons have very different uses and are hard to compare, which is what i wanted to put. It would be redundant to rewrite Truthteller's comment. Also, GL if you don't like criticism

Edited January 25, 2015 by Loackie

[DJHerobrine1 12]

Truthteller's comment may have been cruel, but i do agree with the fact both weapons have very different uses and are hard to compare, which is what i wanted to put. It would be redundant to rewrite Truthteller's comment. Also, GL if you don't like criticism

 

I know how to live with criticism. I think your just over reacting that's all.

[Loackie 269]

 I think your just over reacting that's all.

How, may i ask? Also, do you really have to dislike ALL my posts?

Edited January 27, 2015 by Loackie

[thehunter_Russia 5]

i agree with you buddy

[thehunter_Russia 5]

i really like the railgun in battles becuase it is a strong, powerful weapon

[Thekillerpenguin 1,731]

Did I say that? I never said that you could not have a opinion. I just don't like being criticized when i am trying

"Useless topic" might have been a bit too blunt, but remember that it's a comment on what Loackie and Truthteller believe the quality of the topic is and not you. Don't take it as a personal insult; if you think they have a somewhat valid point, take it into account when you make your next topic. Remember, everybody gets criticism once in a while; the key is to use it to make your topics better if you think it's constructive. :)

 

---

I personally think that Railgun and Thunder are very different, so it's hard to compare one to another. Railgun's great for fighting against lone enemies at long range, while Thunder is more for fighting multiple enemies at medium range.

[roadkill78 39]

if i had to pick one i would have to pick thunder because it matches my style a little more but there both unpleasant to use

it is kinda hard to compare them because ones mid range and the others long range

[Superlative 500]

if i had to pick one i would have to pick thunder because it matches my style a little more but there both unpleasant to use

it is kinda hard to compare them because ones mid range and the others long range

Actually both are mid and long-ranged equipment. They both do well in SandBox (Medium) and Seruphov (Long) maps. So, it proves they are quite well in these maps, only the player's style affects the score.

[DJHerobrine1 12]

How, may i ask? Also, do you really have to dislike ALL my posts?

Fine I don't care any more but I did not down vote all your comments -_-

[DJHerobrine1 12]

"Useless topic" might have been a bit too blunt, but remember that it's a comment on what Loackie and Truthteller believe the quality of the topic is and not you. Don't take it as a personal insult; if you think they have a somewhat valid point, take it into account when you make your next topic. Remember, everybody gets criticism once in a while; the key is to use it to make your topics better if you think it's constructive. :)

 

---

I personally think that Railgun and Thunder are very different, so it's hard to compare one to another. Railgun's great for fighting against lone enemies at long range, while Thunder is more for fighting multiple enemies at medium range.

 

 

 

Ok thanks for the advice.

[r_SUHS1200 6]

Actually that was me

[r_SUHS1200 6]

How, may i ask? Also, do you really have to dislike ALL my posts?

Actually that was me

[roadkill78 39]

Actually both are mid and long-ranged equipment. They both do well in SandBox (Medium) and Seruphov (Long) maps. So, it proves they are quite well in these maps, only the player's style affects the score.

the more range with thunder the less damage

 

it doesn't matter there both terrible to use

 

one is just way too hard to use and the other kills you if you get too close which is hard to deal with

 

and they both have no aim whatsoever

Edited January 28, 2015 by roadkill78

[Loackie 269]

the more range with thunder the less damage 3rd longest effective range ingame

 

it doesn't matter there both terrible to use

 

one is just way too hard to use and the other kills you if you get too close which is hard to deal with "hard to use" how? I'd like some insight tbh

 

and they both have no aim whatsoever ...isn't that a GOOD thing? this is a shooter game, after all.