What is up with the chat violators section?

[snipe3000 678]

I posted a picture with someone saying in two posts "Whoever give me account"   "Random post from some other guy" "I will give my account"

 

 

So 

 Chat Violator: "Whoever give me account"  

 

Random Dude: "Meow I am a cat"

 

Chat Violator: "I will give my account"

 

And a few other guys got into it but only the guys who got into got banned while the Chat Violator only got a

Sorry, not enough reason for ban.

That is unfair to ban the people who get involved but not the starter.

 

Here is link to the post. 

Everyone who was involved got banned but not the starter.

[jazz20 1,181]

I see this around all the time and it is rather upsetting and unjustified in the moderator's part. You need more proof in the starter's part and put them under "provocation." But you do have to remember that getting involved is just as bad in that you're fueling the fire. 

[snipe3000 678]

." But you do have to remember that getting involved is just as bad in that you're fueling the fire. 

I know but if you start it you are the fire.

[dilsharox 2,395]

lol they must be blind

[Maf 32,312]

If you are not satisfied with the moderator's decision, you can contact chat administrators Ostrica or Shar0n to ook into the issue. Public discussions and criticism of moderators' actions are not allowed.

 

Closed.