Is there a way to prevent raising in rank?

[Tiplice 0]

Is there any way to either prevent gaining higher ranks (other than not playing) or somehow degrade yourself rank down after you gained a rank? Or perhaps somehow spend the points used to determine the rank on anything?

 

I'd like to stay Sergeant for some time, so I'll be still allowed in all those low-tech only battles (i.e. those without railguns or other advanced weaponry).

[faisal70 7]

there was write /addscore 10000 but now gone

[Tiplice 0]

That command would add score? But I want the opposite - to decrease my score, so I'll stay within my current rank ....

[r_Pin4er1630 25]

Is there any way to either prevent gaining higher ranks (other than not playing) or somehow degrade yourself rank down after you gained a rank? Or perhaps somehow spend the points used to determine the rank on anything?

 

I'd like to stay Sergeant for some time, so I'll be still allowed in all those low-tech only battles (i.e. those without railguns or other advanced weaponry).

No. There is no way. It will bring disbalance to the game.

[r_Jamshud0 3]

there was write /addscore 10000 but now gone

Forget this completely!

 

This command is available on test server only. If I get you posting this on main servers' chat - you'll get banned for flood.

 

Regarding your question, there is no official way to degrade your rank or keep it on some level - the more you play (fnd the more efficient) - the more rank points you get.

 

Actually, low ranks are passed within a month or two - then you have to spend much more time to get a new rank. For example: after a year of non-fanatic playing (1-2 hrs per day) I'm still colonel :)

[Tiplice 0]

Well, degrading (if you would be allowed to keep your upgraded weapons) could bring some disbalance, but merely staying on one rank?

 

There could be slight disbalance from novices playing with veterans, but if veteran would create another account and start playing from zero points, he'll still have novice tank, but veteran skills.... disbalance anyways.

 

Currently, gaining in rank does not bring only advantages (ability to buy better weapons and participate in more advanced battles in more advanced maps) but also disadvantages (inability to participate in good old low-tech battles), so that is why I want this ....

 

 

Another solution could be to add limit on weapons (and also paint/chassis) level when creating battles - you will create battles accesible to all ranks, but limit weapons to say, Sergeant level.

Anybody wishing to participate in the battle must use weapon, with first level available at the weapon limit of the rank and if they have weapon upgaded more than the rank allows, the weapon will be temporarily downgraded to permitted level during battle.

 

This way veterans can fight with relative newbies (which already happens now, as many battles allow wide range of ranks), but the battles will be more fair (skilled veterans would have to win through they skill, not because they have weapons that are magnitude better than what others have) and thus more balanced.

 

Then there would be no incentive for people to stop progressing with ranks, as you could then technically temporarily downgrade the rank with all the effects (available weapons, etc ...) for one battle you wish to join.

[JunkBeast 0]

Haha, more like a skill test... Not payers :P

I like that :D

And you can always make more accounts :D :P

[Tiplice 0]

Hmm ... I looked through the Terms and conditions and there is nothing forbidding having multiple accounts ... so I think I'll create just a new account once I grow too high in rank to participate in low-tech battles :)

[cablaz 32]

theres no rules against that but why?when u get better weapons you have more kills and kill higher ranks easier and get more score if you keep on staying at a low rank its boring

[r_tanky10 0]

there was write /addscore 10000 but now gone[/quote

 

 

 

 

 

actually i know a way that u can prevent to rank up... comment for more details

[skitee 555]

no, look, this will bring huge disbalance to the game, (eg m3 railguns at sergeantmajor will be the norm). So no.

[tripinot 8]

there was write /addscore 10000 but now gone

Forget this completely!

 

This command is available on test server only. If I get you posting this on main servers' chat - you'll get banned for flood.

 

Regarding your question, there is no official way to degrade your rank or keep it on some level - the more you play (fnd the more efficient) - the more rank points you get.

 

Actually, low ranks are passed within a month or two - then you have to spend much more time to get a new rank. For example: after a year of non-fanatic playing (1-2 hrs per day) I'm still colonel :)

 

lol one year ? colonel= 65.000 points i think. wo5-third lieutenant is 35.000 got it in one month. playing half - 1 hour a day weekend like 3-4 hours so u should need 3 mont not 1 year :shock: :roll: :!:

[r_AdvocatusDiaboli0 861]

 

lol one year ? colonel= 65.000 points i think. wo5-third lieutenant is 35.000 got it in one month. playing half - 1 hour a day weekend like 3-4 hours so u should need 3 mont not 1 year :shock: :roll: :!:

 

Tripinot, Moderators and Admins don't play as much as you think they would.

[tripinot 8]

 

lol one year ? colonel= 65.000 points i think. wo5-third lieutenant is 35.000 got it in one month. playing half - 1 hour a day weekend like 3-4 hours so u should need 3 mont not 1 year :shock: :roll: :!:

 

Tripinot, Moderators and Admins don't play as much as you think they would.

 

oh yes thats true

[eessydo 17]

SURE there is a way to not step up in rank.

 

Follow these simple steps:

 

1. Join a game

2. Drive around aimlessly

3. Make every effort to not pick up any power ups

4. NEVER hit your space bar

5. Get killed as much as possible

 

 

Works like a charm!!

[eessydo 17]

SURE there is a way to not step up in rank.

 

Follow these simple steps:

 

1. Join a game

2. Drive around aimlessly

3. Make every effort to not pick up any power ups

4. NEVER hit your space bar

5. Get killed as much as possible

 

Ideally you will have a negative K/D ratio.

 

Works like a charm!!

[r_R3APER0 16]

you CAN"T have a negative ratio....lol. its your Kills/ Death....even 0/1000000000000 is still 0....where did you learn your math???

[r_St.Evergreen0 3]

you CAN"T have a negative ratio....lol. its your Kills/ Death....even 0/1000000000000 is still 0....where did you learn your math???

 

Dude, if that happens, like you get all losses and no destroys then your D/L ratio would be remain as the dash thingy -----

[Contaminated 129]

you CAN"T have a negative ratio....lol. its your Kills/ Death....even 0/1000000000000 is still 0....where did you learn your math???

 

Dude, if that happens, like you get all losses and no destroys then your D/L ratio would be remain as the dash thingy -----

 

R3APER got pwned XD

[r_R3APER0 16]

you CAN"T have a negative ratio....lol. its your Kills/ Death....even 0/1000000000000 is still 0....where did you learn your math???

 

Dude, if that happens, like you get all losses and no destroys then your D/L ratio would be remain as the dash thingy -----

 

R3APER got pwned XD

 

still not negative. ahaha YOU got pwned :D

[eessydo 17]

you CAN"T have a negative ratio....lol. its your Kills/ Death....even 0/1000000000000 is still 0....where did you learn your math???

 

1. It is a joke, relax.

2. Ratios CAN be NEGATIVE, not sure where you learned your math???? A debt to earnings ratio is a negative number (unless of course you earn more than you owe), it is just show more often than not as an absolute value. Price to earnings ratios can in some instances also be displayed as negative numbers, but again, usually are not.

 

 

OWNED

[r_R3APER0 16]

you CAN"T have a negative ratio....lol. its your Kills/ Death....even 0/1000000000000 is still 0....where did you learn your math???

 

1. It is a joke, relax.

2. Ratios CAN be NEGATIVE, not sure where you learned your math???? A debt to earnings ratio is a negative number (unless of course you earn more than you owe), it is just show more often than not as an absolute value. Price to earnings ratios can in some instances also be displayed as negative numbers, but again, usually are not.

 

 

OWNED

hahaha i realize that this is a joke :D

O RLY? you were talking about the ratio HERE ON TANKI, not about some guys debt. And in this case, K/D means that 0/# of deaths is STILL 0...hence not negative, since zero is neither positive or negative. Owned? I think yes.