[Issue 44] The Dumbest Anti-supply Arguments of All-Time!

[Brubook 1,161]

Lel, and like I mentioned before, "argument" was concluded. Move on.

For the first time  I agree with you ... LOL

[The-Operator219 1,929]

"Knowing your enemy is the fastest way to victory." ~NOT Sun Tzu, but I forget who

Edited December 17, 2015 by The-Operator219

[canadarules 1,938]

"Knowing your enemy is the fastest way to victory." ~NOT Sun Tzu, but I forget who

 

knowing how to post a non midget picture is the fastest way to win~ canadarules

[sonofchrysalis3 3,719]

OMIGOSH I'm not the only one who read The Art of War! Awesome!

[The-Operator219 1,929]

If it is from that, I couldn't cite it online.

Anyways, yeah, I've become the majority.

I try not to be a jerk about, and end battles with the same message: "I apologize for being a pain, thank you for putting up with it.".

I'm not really sure if I'll continue using supplies, since I just need to get to the higher ranks.

[RustyNail 1,538]

If it is from that, I couldn't cite it online.

Anyways, yeah, I've become the majority.

I try not to be a jerk about, and end battles with the same message: "I apologize for being a pain, thank you for putting up with it.".

I'm not really sure if I'll continue using supplies, since I just need to get to the higher ranks.

Higher ranks require more supplies. As you go up, the need increases.

[The-Operator219 1,929]

Well hopefully I'll get some cash on the way up.

It's not an ideal solution, but it's a solution.

[canadarules 1,938]

OMIGOSH I'm not the only one who read The Art of War! Awesome!

omg move into the new century please

no one reads anymore

[RustyNail 1,538]

omg move into the new century please

no one reads anymore

Probably, that's why the world is going to hell... People grow up without acquiring knowledge from previous generations. Dumpest generation ever. What a pity...

[The-Operator219 1,929]

omg move into the new century please

no one reads anymore

...How do you use the forum then?

I still read, and I'm from the current generation.

[personia 4,036]

omg move into the new century please

no one reads anymore

Huh. Could've fooled me... Most people I know can read. And many of them do for enjoyment. Maybe you should move into the real world?

 

Probably, that's why the world is going to hell... People grow up without acquiring knowledge from previous generations. Dumpest generation ever. What a pity...

That... That is so absolutely true.

 

...How do you use the forum then?

I still read, and I'm from the current generation.

And let me be the first to inform you that you're not alone. :P

[P_U_N_I_S_H_E_R 732]

Ok then just someone else's opinion on a topic that we have all heard several times.

Edited December 18, 2015 by P_U_N_I_S_H_E_R

[MacNaughton 4]

For the most part I read just main ideas and get the jist of the argument. It's a controversial topic. There really isn't much of a story here if you ask me. The bare bones is Supplies are staying. Choose for yourself whether you supply or not and try not to get too religious about other people supplying or not. Play your game and deal with the reality. In my opinion, just too many words in the article to waste too much time reading through (irregardless of whether I agree with the article or not).

 

Play on! ^_^

[comandobob 15]

 

Dear Bob

 

Your level of "drugging" is not to be even called drugging!

The point that some of the players here don't get is that noone wants drugs to be removed and levels of drugging like yours is fully accepted. That is a more than moderate drugging.

 

When you see someone using 50-100 drugs per hour it create a problem, that is the "mass drugs use" you talk about, that is the drugs usage that change a 10-2 battle to a 10-20 in minutes. That is not "variety" of game but rage ... that is unfair!

A 50-100 drugs per hour usage does not create any "variety" ... it is a constant exaggeration!

 

So everything come to the point of "where is every person's limit between moderate drugging and excessive drugging"?

 

Unfortunately that is now up to every single player and what you define "mass supply use that decide the outcome of a battle" some other players here define it "normal playing". This is wrong and that is why this has to be ruled and limited. Especially younger minds have no limits!

 

i agree that there is a very broad line between everyones definition of excessive drugging and well..... for lack of better words non excessive drugging but my point is i don't care if every single person on the opposite team is doing their utmost best to use as many supplies as possible as long as my team and I are able to handle their strategies. I've been in those situations and personally i find it can be more fun to be playing a faster paced game and it is all the more mentally rewarding when you crush your opponents even if they have the advantage. and while i say i rarely use supplies that doesn't mean I'm saying the same for the other 9 people on my team. not all mass supply battles are really that unbalanced. and then there are those that are unbalanced and thats where i do agree with you and my only solution is if the battle really is that off  kilter chances are people are just going to leave so at that point just join them in a more balanced battle. (just for the rec i never suggested supplies be removed... that would kind of defeat the point of my argument)

Edited December 22, 2015 by comandobob

[rocketstar31 3]

Nice article, and thanks to Lhamster for monitering. 

 

 

 

Remember the sale topic...Remember...

[DonuldTwump 0]

 

The problem is not that your opponents lack skills; it’s that YOU, militant supply-less tanker, lack skills.

Really? Did you just call people who don't use supplies lacking skills? Please do not make the same generalization that people are making about so-called n00b supply abusers that you happen to be defending.

[BSG-62 512]

*hardly ever uses drugs* *apparently lacks skills because of that* *comes first in a bunch of battles* *still lacks skills?*

[Helindu_2014 830]

Your articles need to be more well formatted. This is an eye-sore to read. 

So is the content.