Jump to content
EN
Play

Forum

[Issue 46] The Ultimate Reporter Showdown: Why BP is Better than XP


 Share

The Ultimate Reporter Showdown Poll  

235 members have voted

  1. 1. Which combination is better?

    • XP
      114
    • BP
      120
  2. 2. Who won the debate?

    • Gold
      116
    • Pho
      118


Recommended Posts

GoldRock: Uhm, no. XP is like, way funner

The grammar police have arrived. Before anything nice can be said about the article, we must come and bash all the little mistakes, namely this. According to the dictionary I have (an old Oxford from 1990), funner isn't a word. Correction over, you may go back to enjoying the article. 

XP is better.

 

  • Like 9

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The grammar police have arrived. Before anything nice can be said about the article, we must come and bash all the little mistakes, namely this. According to the dictionary I have (an old Oxford from 1990), funner isn't a word. Correction over, you may go back to enjoying the article. 

XP is better.

 

Have you considered it was deliberate?

 

Shut up I guys I am fed up of this agurment.Just think that both combos are better.

I think you missed the humour...

  • Like 14

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you considered it was deliberate?

Yes, I considered that, and threw it into the dust like any other good grammar nazi would do. Away with you and your petty excuses.

No :ph34r:.

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The grammar police have arrived. Before anything nice can be said about the article, we must come and bash all the little mistakes, namely this. According to the dictionary I have (an old Oxford from 1990), funner isn't a word. Correction over, you may go back to enjoying the article. 

XP is better.

 

#annoyinggramernazi

 

 

BP ftw

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am a noob. XP is better. GoldRock is soooo awesome!

XP RULES :)

Edited by GoldRock
Please don't quote the entire article when posting, thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 
 

Well I just can't seem to see your post here anymore. Sorry.

 

To everyone else, I appreciate your constructive comments and opinions, hope you guys liked the article ^_^

 

I guess the marriage discussed in the dictator just crashed and burned, and it is great to see you back gold.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why is there an attempt at humor in nearly every single line? If I want to laugh at some easy humor I can go watch a sitcom or something. I came here expecting an in-depth and considerate analysis of two combinations. I more or less got what I was looking for, but it was difficult to extract from this article due to the wacky format and constant humor.

 

This is an unpopular opinion, but I feel that humor is becoming overvalued. Humor is a really powerful tool that can help man find joy in the darkest, wierdest aspects of life, and thus can make them more approachable. But it can also overshadow more complex thoughts and emotions, which blocks people from deep contemplation or inspiration.

 

I'm not saying that the TO Newspaper should get rid of humor; some parts of this article gave me a good laugh. I'm saying it should be used with a lot more sparsity and care, because it's limiting the potential of the TO Newspaper to unite the community and help tankers find joy in the game.

 

Don't be afraid to be serious.

Edited by MandolinMarc
  • Like 13

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I considered that, and threw it into the dust like any other good grammar nazi would do. Away with you and your petty excuses.

No :ph34r:.

 

*Grammar Nazi. There Proper Nouns! :P

Great Article. BP is probably better in XP/BP battles to to its light weight but in everything else, XP is better.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was going say a similar thing to MandolinMarc, but he has clearly expressed himself far better and more eloquently. I would have enjoyed the article very much more if not for the long-winded introduction (could have been cut down to two lines). Humour is being used far more now in articles, especially those with two authors. It is getting rather repetitive and takes the value away. It would have made for a very intriguing and heated debate otherwise, actually.

  • Like 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Really appreciated the feedback ^_^

Please keep in mind that this is a light debate between two wackos, and we wrote everything up quite naturally. It's our actual way of conversing, with the nug humour and all XD

Sorry if you didn't enjoy it. For the same subject with a serious approach, you can see Fen's article, XP vs BP

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In writing the article, we weren't looking to be super technical or serious or deep about the matter, we just wanted to converse as we would naturally about the issue (sorry if that's a bit too wacky, hh, we're kinda like that). 

I understand completely where you're coming from and I personally love a deeply critical, contemplating and powerful debate, but to be honest, I'm sure I would have bored Pho out of her mind eventually if I launched into it with that approach. I agree with you two exactly, I would even personally prefer to read a more intellectual debate myself; however, we're writing for the majority of readers here who Pho would represent in her more light-hearted viewpoint, to make the debate both substantial and easy to read, and I think we managed to achieve that. As far as I'm concerned, I appreciate your feedback but we were able to satisfy the majority of readers and provide them with an enjoyable read. 

If we were to have taken your approach, most readers would not have enjoyed this article as much, even if myself and yourselves may have found it much more rewarding. Sorry for being populist, but the duty of the newspaper is to write articles suited to our playerbase, and I hope you understand that. Thus, we tried to achieve a 'middle ground', where we did make some thoughtful points for the more critical reader to consider, but also didn't get overly involved in the intellectual side of things and kept it fun.

 

So yeah, in short - don't be afraid to be light-hearted. The reason the newspaper uses humour is because our readers enjoy it. In fact, I keep on getting asked to put out more humour, not less. If you'd like an intellectual article, there are always detailed guides and the like targetted at that, but they inevitably are quite 'niche' articles. I would write intellectual for an intellectual newspaper - this is a gaming newspaper, so I write for the gaming playerbase. I take most joy and pride in being able to write for my audiences, something I personally find a valuable quality for any writer.

 

Hope I've made at least some sense, and thanks for the feedback!

(Just thought I'd edit and add this bit for clarity. In short, I'd personally very much enjoy an intellectual debate as you would, but I'm not writing for myself or the intellectual minority here, but for the majority of more light-hearted readers, if that makes sense. Oh, and I do also enjoy being light-hearted too :P)

Edited by GoldRock
  • Like 13

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...