Declined protection module idea

[wolverine848 13,097]

Then 40-40-40-30?

Much better

[GorgoBlesk 831]

Then 40-40-40-30?

Too OP. It is 150% in total. 30-30-30-30 or 25-25-25-25 would be good.

[FrozenRailgun 1,771]

Much better

 

Too OP. It is 150% in total. 30-30-30-30 or 25-25-25-25 would be good.

Ok everyone. I know both of you want to solve the module problem but we need to discuss more ideas and then which idea will get the most vote.

 

Whoever get the most vote, that idea will send to Alternativa. Period.

I dislike the idea, the reason I never play MM on this acc is protection modules, everyone has 50% protection against my turret, imagine 75  -_-

Hornet's OD is here now. Have fun counter-punishing anyone who uses M4 Falcon.

[wolverine848 13,097]

Too OP. It is 150% in total. 30-30-30-30 or 25-25-25-25 would be good.

LOL.   Why would anyone give up 50/50/50 for 25/25/25/25?   That's just brutal.

[Kill_the_Propaganda2 684]

LOL.   Why would anyone give up 50/50/50 for 25/25/25/25?   That's just brutal.

Players with the Spectrum-B Module already have that and then some. 

[wolverine848 13,097]

Players with the Spectrum-B Module already have that and then some. 

And... do they wear it now that flex 50/50/50 are available?  I wouldn't...

[Kill_the_Propaganda2 684]

And... do they wear it now that flex 50/50/50 are available?  I wouldn't...

I see some of them wearing it still. I find that it's more worth it to do 50-50-50 since it's only 8 players in MM and there is a chance there is a duplicate of 2 turrets. 

[FrozenRailgun 1,771]

Much better

Then should we reduce the module price if Alternativa implemented this?

 

 

Too OP. It is 150% in total. 30-30-30-30 or 25-25-25-25 would be good.

More like 30-30-30-30-30 or 25-25-25-25-25-25.

[wolverine848 13,097]

Then should we reduce the module price if Alternativa implemented this?

.

Why would price go down?  Still have same overall protection. 

 

I envision the 50/50/50 co-exists with the alternative. The alternative just provides some flex as we have more turrets - some that do 2 types of damage...

 

Your choice to MU beyond the 30% or 40%.  Costs remain the same.

[ILiveOnTheChatBox123 936]

You CANT have too much protection from any turret! :excl:

Yes, that isida may be annoying, but it has to be able to deal a damage of 50 health / 2 seconds-otherwise it will just do the same thing to your firebird-and all your M3 turrets will feel like M0s.

This is NOT an upgrade or improvement to tanki! :angry:

[FrozenRailgun 1,771]

Why would price go down?  Still have same overall protection. 

 

I envision the 50/50/50 co-exists with the alternative. The alternative just provides some flex as we have more turrets - some that do 2 types of damage...

 

Your choice to MU beyond the 30% or 40%.  Costs remain the same.

Oh ok.... But this should be an alternation. After all, not everyone will glue in to 40-40-40-30.

 

You CANT have too much protection from any turret! :excl:

Yes, that isida may be annoying, but it has to be able to deal a damage of 50 health / 2 seconds-otherwise it will just do the same thing to your firebird-and all your M3 turrets will feel like M0s.

This is NOT an upgrade or improvement to tanki! :angry:

Instead of 50-50-50 if you are equipping 3 M4 modules.

 

If idea get implemented, 4 M4 modules are allowed but percentage of protection reduced to 40-40-40-30, not 50-50-50-50.

[Maf 32,338]

Status changed to Declined

[FrozenRailgun 1,771]

Status changed to Declined

RIP.... Oh well, at least some dudes are happy that this idea got declined.

[ILiveOnTheChatBox123 936]

This deserves to be declined-this is not an improvement to Tanki.