Excellent idea! If the devs feel they've lost some support from the players due to the recent updates, this would be an excellent time to make amends! *nudge nudge*

I don't know what you're trying to show in the video. Is the rebalance somehow forcing you to all be smoky + wasps? NO! Understand the definition of the word "rebalance" before you get all butthurt about it. Before, you had 3 viable hulls and 4 (really 3) viable guns. Now, there's 7 hulls and 8 guns. How does that not make the game more varied, balanced, and interesting?! You guys need to grow up and realize that change isn't always bad. You can enjoy tanki before the rebalance and after the rebalance.

It would be like Mann vs. Machine from TF2. Nice idea.

NS battles are a joke, especially if you are at low ranks (and by low I mean under 3rd luitenant). Before I was a WO1, I saw a grand total of one NS battle, and it only had one player in it. The only other viable solution I've heard is to drug back. Well, I get at most 30 supplies a day. That's enough for maybe 15 mins of drugging a day. And that's if I don't get the stupid DCC again. It's buy or be out-bought. My argument stands. Oh, and by the way, I don't want drugs to be removed. I just want them nerfed a bit.

Nope, still as broken as the North Korean economy. When will the devs learn that a balanced game -> more players (and happier players) -> more revenue!? And a broken, unfair game -> less players -> less revenue (even if revenue-per-player is greater). This isn't rocket science...

Eh, I don't know. I find it too easy to judge people based on their rank now (ie. not looking at threads started by super low ranking players). It's especially silly because the only real difference between the WO ranks and marshall is the amount of xp grinding. You can have an equally good understanding of the game at both levels.

So my computer has some ghosting issues with the Tanki controls (I can't turn my turret while moving forward and firing). On the Tanki website it says: Does anyone know when this will happen? I know there are alternative controls, but that's not the same thing.

What actually is the argument against weapon/hull restrictions?

While I understand your annoyance with druggers, I don't think your proposed solution would work. Suppose the battle creator is in second place and a skilled player (drugging or non-drugging) is in first. What's to stop the host to kick that person just to get more crystals? I would suggest a few things for you: 1. Don't be afraid to use drugs yourself. 2. There are more no supply battles at higher ranks. 3. They can't really make no supply battles free, because there would be little opportunity for income from non-druggers then. It's not ideal, but I think the current system is a pretty good one considering it allows most of us to play for free. And I'm not really sure what you're trying to do kilaz, but I do know you're acting like an asshole.

Pretty easy to understand dude. Just because plastic flower is normally all weird and confusing doesn't mean he always is.

This was on my second account. Quite good for a first seargent if I do say so myself. :) I got lucky with the battle, only 2 other players stayed for the entire thing, and there weren't any druggers or hackers.

Except I almost never see no supply battles, and when I do they only have one or two players in them. At lower ranks this is not a viable solution at all.

Kill youself. NOW. Broken record? This seems to be the only thing you're capable of saying....

Sorry to bring this up again, but I just had to share this example from a battle I was just in. As you might have guessed, the top players on both teams were full out druggers. Everyone else used drugs more sparingly. Say what you will about ways to combat druggers, but it's just doesn't seem right to me that 82% of the crystals went to two single druggers. That's a lot of frustrated players with very few crystals, for both teams. Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to continue my opinion that things should change, I'm just putting a piece of evidence out there into the thread.