Yes that's my point. That's what I'm talking about all the time. But if I do not like something, I'll say. As I did. These things are separated. It also said the second man in the conversation. DarkLord criticized my picture and I wanted to hear. I followed his discussion with another man and I saw the latent need for advertising in DarkLord words. Wise thoughts - that's an excuse, o man... The other one (MilvjoeFox) criticized the image, and he gave his opinion. It also annoys me that MilvojeFox took my picture for example. He was supposed to draw a picture of him, so that we're talking about his. I wanted to give him a "minus" but he expleined very well how DarkLord blended thesis. So I gave him the "plus", although it deserves "minus". Deserves a "minus" because it criticizes only the entries that are displayed, and forget the fact that other 1000 drawings can all be very bad. My work I have the right to compare. And I'm really glad you tell me what's wrong with the picture. Because that's the only way to learn to do better (like every seminar at the university which is made by several times, while a professor does not say that it was good). It is not my business to judge, but I have to alert to some things that can to awake memories in some people. This is dangerous, and may be painful. You might have to censor the image, as well as any other (and my picture). We are all witnesses of recent developments on the east (I do not want to talk about it). Thank you, Regards. Wish u gg.

Wrong man! There is point ! Everything can be discussed, it is the basis of everything. Then let's close our forum. "Third - Yes, there is no point in judging them now. Judging and discussing are two different things." That's what I say. Nobody expects you to change the decision . But should talk about the decision and I compared the two images: Cutting head and farting. Thanks for the comment my picture, it's ok and I respect that, that is in place. I'll fix it next time. I just do not agree to "Stikers" because I drew everything all in the picture, due to copyright subsisting on the Internet. I have some biology books (I am a biology student. I draw preparations of algae and insects. so to me it was not a problem . Also we have a basis of hand-drown pictures and phorographs. Then I scan and process it in some of the plugins). So this stickers is my work. Together, you and MilivojeFox talked about it and you clearly remarked. I do not offend anyone. He explained, but u did not until now. If it is not what is in your mind, then my deepest apologies. But certainly, I do not like that you say that there is no point in discussion. You see that there is, at least as far as I'm concerned, you told me what was wrong with the picture. This is a comment on the decision of the jury and I am grateful so Thx for that.

OK. this is going too far. I thought this was over. Following discussion of these two and generally agree with both of them. BUT: NOT OK: @MilivojeFOX thank you for taking my picture for example, but I did not ask. Maybe I know what you're talking about the jury, but I did not want to write about it !!! Nice explained image. BUT NOT like what you take for example my picture !!!!! Ask me next time !!!!!!! You talk about it as if it was something more serious, and that's why you're wrong place !!! @DarkLord991 Do you think if I was going to insult and belittle Semjon? It's a picture and it is for me one joke and nothing more! I drew him as he farted !!! Another competitor cut off his head , and that's OK , it 's not an insult !? It's my starting point !!! I agree with you that this should be stopped !! But DarkLord991, Your words: "It's just pointless to show your judging opinion since it not gonna change anything." No point ??? The point of the word "discussion" is to be commented on, although no one here thinks of changing the decision of the jury! Or at least no one told. You have to watch your thoughts, because you turned out very funny! Is bigger joke when someone draw with the head cut off, and with a bloody neck, or draw when you fart ?? Are you aware of that!? A competitor who drew a "cut off Semyon's head wins !!? A second competing is one that offends??? This is not a question for any of you two, this is my statement that questions the jury's decision. I love fun and always I will compete in every such event! "Wise thoughts" ... oh man, I wish you to start a war with them, that would be great !!! And Both of you are so funny !!!! Thanx for that !

OK. this is going too far. I thought this was over. Following discussion of these two and generally agree with both of them. BUT: NOT OK: @MilivojeFOX thank you for taking my picture for example, but I did not ask. Maybe I know what you're talking about the jury, but I did not want to write about it !!! Nice explained image. BUT NOT like what you take for example my picture !!!!! Ask me next time !!!!!!! You talk about it as if it was something more serious, and that's why you're wrong place !!! @DarkLord991 Do you think if I was going to insult and belittle Semjon? It's a picture and it is for me one joke and nothing more! I drew him as he farted !!! Another competitor cut off his head , and that's OK , it 's not an insult !? It's my starting point !!! I agree with you that this should be stopped !! But DarkLord991, Your words: "It's just pointless to show your judging opinion since it not gonna change anything." No point ??? The point of the word "discussion" is to be commented on, although no one here thinks of changing the decision of the jury! Or at least no one told. You have to watch your thoughts, because you turned out very funny! Is bigger joke when someone draw with the head cut off, and with a bloody neck, or draw when you fart ?? Are you aware of that!? A competitor who drew a "cut off Semyon's head wins !!? A second competing is one that offends??? This is not a question for any of you two, this is my statement that questions the jury's decision. I love fun and always I will compete in every such event! "Wise thoughts" ... oh man, I wish you to start a war with them, that would be great !!! And Both of you are so funny !!!! Thanx for that !

This is the point...PROBLEMATIC JURY... IT IS NOT THE WAY OF MAKIN' POSTS, but this. No Art, No Fun, Copy of Original ideas..- this is your decision.

http://postimg.org/image/q2zy6yp1d/ Mine is better ! hehehe I did it all by my self, no copy paste from internet like our WINNERS..and idea is better hehe, and smell is great !!! smells like s**t spirit --

http://postimg.org/image/q2zy6yp1d/ Me - AtonDog ....aka real life nick Ika It is ok ???

Hi... i took a still image (press P on webteh player) and edit edit edit edit an now i have just his face with unnatural smile, and all other is edited. Hope u will like it...

Хammer is not well balanced weapon . You say that for close combat . No, not so. Simply is too strong . Can threw almost from the corner to corner on sandboks and pushing opponents moves . Тhe strike force must decline more with distance . Simply not good .

please! Do something about XP battles. We have a problem with people who enter into battle with inadequate equipment. Many times we ask them nicely to change or leave, they refuse or ignore. The result is that other players leave the game and look for another game with the responsible people. I know there was a topic about this, but please, If possible, do a new setting (new option to check) in the PRO-battles, which is clearly marked with what equipment it is possible to get into the XP / VP game: -simple no protection colors (or make new color for XP, we will buy it for 100 or 1000 crys), -hornet, -VASP and -railgan. This is not just my opinion, I talked to several people and all think the same. Please if u can! Help us! Thank you!

yes man...i agree with you... I agree with you that the selfdestruct may be unintentional, it's a good observation. Also every weapon has its advantages .... But... As there is an option (box for a check) for the friendlyfire, nosuply ... so it should be added one more box to check...BOX for SelfDestruct thanx ZJ

First, read my proposal, then bring your vulgar conclusions. If you want to know what it is, you have to read it. Simple rule - applied in schools. So, I wonna new option in create battle, I want a new feature that provides the ability to choose how to count selfdestruct in Team Death Match (aka TDM), as a point for opposite team or not. SImple choice. You dont need to enter in that battle !!!!!! Please mind your words, I do not offend anyone here. Your word talks about you... (((

You see, it is a problem of any discussion, I made a mistake in writing and you are talkin about that instead of the story of selfdestruct. The essence is that you should change the option in *create battle* and add the ability to count selfdestrukt as a points for opposite team. Please do not pay attention to the error in the title ... because it is not relevant to the proposal ...

I can do selfdestruct too---but i think that in TDM should be reconsider that rule... i think that this should be added as a option in "create game"... I like this game a lot... and it relax me every evening thanks

yes...but i'm just sayin' to consider this thank you for your reply ZJ