IKR :lol:

Dear yele, if I understand your post correctly, I already have.

You're most welcome! Glad to see my comment was appreciated!

I don't really get what's so special about it as a genre, but yeah, seems it must be good.

My condolences go to the victims and their community.

Saying who your least favourite staff members are in your opinion, and what they could do to improve (politely), won't harm anyone either... I'm struggling to understand why we're allowed to refer to staff when we want to compliment them, but not when we want to offer areas where they could improve. Anyway, we can discuss it in private, so this topic can get back on track. Thanks for your explanation ^_^

The above posts should be hidden. They break the rules in that they refer to specific staff members. Funnily enough, this rule has been applied to critical posts over complimemtary ones, as shown above... It would be great if I could receive a response to the point made here. For example, if I posted "mod xyz is amazing" and "mod xyz is terrible", shouldn't both be hidden? It seems only the critical ones are being hidden here and elsewhere, though...

PC gaming FTW.

Already said :P

Thanks! :D

:lol: Thanks for the feedback guys, I'll redo it completely.

Good topic ^_^ How're you going to know what you're good at if you only fully learn one subject? You might be great at the advanced level of Physics, for example, even though you could have been mediocre at it in secondary school. In any case, you're not going to be good at everything you learn, but employers want to see that you've had a varied education anyway. It's good to have a rounded knowledge; knowing a basic level of arithmetic but not being very good at further Maths topics is better than not knowing any Maths at all, for example.

The above posts should be hidden. They break the rules in that they refer to specific staff members. Funnily enough, this rule has been applied to critical posts over complimemtary ones, as shown above... And that's because it seems even the mods themselves haven't collectively drawn a line for when something breaks the rule on discussion of the moderation system - a post which one mod might see as acceptable could be hidden by another. Then, the post would be unhidden and rehidden as the mods try to decide whether it breaks the rules or not. As has happened here and elsewhere. Numerous times. No wonder players are scared... Note: This post doesn't break the rules, I believe, so please don't hide it.

Still a few hours to go :P Congrats, and great poetry ^_^

Nah, but it's so easy to tell when it's one of your alts, mainly because of the ":3" smiley you use, and the "im" which never seems to have an apostrophe, though it should do xD Anyway, back on-topic.

Wow, you have so many accounts flea :P

You've missed a lot. Would you like me to PM you to tell you eveything that's gone on, and why this topic exists?

Awesome work, great idea ^_^

I see what you did there.

Thanks for your responses, Nick and FBI. It's strange how you were forbidden to post here, but anyway... To FBI: All I can say is don't mess with the skittle :lol: Just joking; I'll leave it to him to respond to your points, and I'm sure he will be able to do so more than adequately. To Nick: Thank you! You have been the first person to confirm this! Not that I haven't tried to ask; my question has been avoided numerous times... And I do hope you're telling the truth, and that if you checked the IPs, none of the accounts used to upvote/downvote would match that of a staff member. Anyway, thanks for answering :) As for the fact that staff are paid, am I not allowed to mention this now? I was simply using it to make the point that you should have been responding to this topic. But now I understand why you weren't, and now that you are responding, I'll drop that argument out of respect for your well-written response ^_^ Still, I'm disappointed (if not appalled) with what's been going on behind the scenes with the staff today. But of course, that should and will remain behind the scenes, for the time being. Clearly, there are problems with the system; I hope you continue to respond to our suggestions, and thanks once again. Thanks for unhiding this post, though it shouldn't have been hidden in the first place.

I think he thought he was complimenting you :lol: Anyway, for the sake of not having any more posts hidden, please stay on topic... Just ignore his comment.

Guess who it was who was arguing with us? It takes two sides to have an argument, you know... _______ Back on topic.

Amazingly slow.

I voted yes, actually. The ability to create battles for a wide range of ranks means that I can join clan trainings, and play with my higher-ranked friends. In terms of ordinary battles, simply don't join those which are open to ranks much higher than yours.

But that is exactly what you, the staff, have already done... :mellow: Look at posts 34 and 36 on this topic...