That is the exact same image, don't talk stupid things.

Your picture is made following a very popular tutorial and with tons of weird mistakes in the process of that.

http://prntscr.com/5dtyd3 I don't know where you found that second point.

Because there is none. You stole the picture and removed the watermark of the author, thus stealing his work. And yes, you are a plagiarist if you do such things.

You really have the nerve to talk such stupid things when he gave actual proof you claimed the picture as your for no reason?

It's as early as early can be.

Some are good, some aren't.

Logos are supposed to be flat, with only a couple of base colors, not with bevels, embossing and smoke. Look at the logos of American sports teams for ideal examples.

There's a lot to explain and I really don't have the time to do that, sorry.

They should have posted a guide on how a logo should look like, like in the Russian logo contests. Most of the participants have no idea about any basic things.

The professional art critic. That's not 5 minutes of work but I doubt that it's 2 hours as well.

Skulls, blood are beyond compare to animals. Skulls and blood are a very cheap way of making something look vicious. And I like to make logos so they would be usable both in 3 different ways: full logo, just the mascot, just the letters. This is how most sports team logos are made.

I'd say some sample images would be good for starters.

How is a bear connected to the name "Virtus.pro"? It is a very popular professional gaming team whose logo is professionally made and it has a whole marketing line with it. If every logo would be directly related to the meaning of the team's name the predictability of the logo would ruin the whole idea, thus most often a unique mascot is made.

Raw logo: