I like the concept of the experiment, but I think it brings to the forefront some issues with the scoring structure. Most critically in the team environment. In the single player environment, it seems ok that the crystal drops are divided based on your score. You are in control of your own game and no whether you suck or not and what you should expect to see as a result. I think in a team game this falls flat, as in much of the other team scoring. If I play well on a team with zero score, I see no benefit whatsoever and only the dominant team sees a gain. I cannot control the performance of my team, therefore I should not be bogged down because of that fact. Perhaps you can rank ALL players and reward the dropped crystal portion based on overall score, or even by some other way. Some way which benefits players who are on a losing team and still have played well....especially in cases when a team gets zero. Generally speaking the scoring structure should be re-reviewed. I think most players would be open to more experiments such as this, we can at least see there is a development attempt at dealing with issues we see day to day. It may not solve the problem, but helps us see that you are working toward something greater. thanks