First, I do not offend anyone, I love this game and a lot of people here. But love and discussion. Great to have you closing this story. Unfortunately, the full replacement of the thesis. ------------------- First you personalize the jury. So you then switched to cheap collecting points and scoring. The metaphor of 10-15 years is the first denial of interviewees (immature as you say). (You will say it is not, but that sentence opens a clear path to this conclusion) Well, you're then told that the jury is serious and that varies according to age. (I do not watch meaning what is clear, but the function remarks) Well, you said you noticed other works and you do not think they are better than others (the question is: which other works are you watching?) So there you have then found one LOL. It was the first metaphor... There you are somewhere for the first time closed topic. And then I nicely explained, what is the role of the jury. I explained that the value of painting. (There is a link for proverb) You did not have a word of explanation, but attitude. The position involves explanation. If you want to argue take examples and explanations. If you will not explain, then you have no need to interfere with the conversation. A simple thing. And do not talk to others to hear your words, it is a cheap pathos seeking a majority in public opinion. If you already talk to specific one. And then you moved on quotes (Charles Spurgeon). Roughly, you found one adequate. (But find your own words. Believe me, if something like that you think up, being my greatest honor for me to talk to you) There you are trying to be confident, but not too successful and not very funny. Reason: But you have to know the difference between "high regard" and "competence" (competence is acquired by experience, over time, I work nicely described, expressed my opinion.) No one attacks you, I am attacking option. On the contrary , if there are rules for which you refuse some pictures , there must be the rule in the judgment . it is possible to find a hole in your interpretation of the rules. Then you started to make the jury relative, this competition you started you call a fun. (It should be a "fun", but not a joke) Who offends? I told you that the image hornet and beans is vulgar, but that is not sick as other one, which is cut off heads, read! What's next? Japanese proverbs or recipes for cakes. (This is immature). It's nice that defend the jury, maybe one of them is your friend. But you have to differentiate the actor from the role, the actor can be a friend, a role is what he produces. I criticize the product. To which I said it was not genuine. What we concluded. Come on, close your topic, I hate to closing. And you do it very well. (Well, this is an example of gaining experience). PS. We'll talk more the next time you close your topic . ( I hope that this last is counterproductive ...)

ok..

Picture number 5. Picture by Laky_1998 :( Taking heads of !!!! Man this is not good.

I agree with u. Thx man...., but I had to answer the man who thinks that knows something ... aka DarkLord991 He does not know the basic rules: everyone has the right to criticize if he can explain. DarkLord991 has to explain his assertion and opinion, and not to attack those who attack opinion. It is a basic rule of the jury. He must not even think he has in front of him interviewees 10-15 years old, it is ignorance and inability to defend its position . when the competition is over, attack the decision of the jury - During the contest, criticizing the works (pictures, poems). The jury is criticized by criticizing the image that the jury chose . This is free lesson - Learn this u will need it. Of course I agree , this is fun and should remain fun. And it is still fun.

@DarkLord991.. .. Ah how funny u r... R u listening to your self man??? "It might not be an original idea" Enough for me..This is all I am talking about, and it is not an original idea! No one is hating here, reality man... ------------------------------------------------------------------ I do graphic design . Preparation of art books , anecdotes and novels for printing . And believe me I've seen thousands of images and vignettes works . Indeed partly agree with one competitor here ... who said that three images can pass , I say more. He said that three pictures satisfy the criteria to win , and reasons ( but incomplete ) . You probably never in your life have not participated in any serious jury, you see I am, and I know the rules of judging. Also, I hang out with artists, painters, designers, writers, poets (pictorial and artistic designs are accepted by many authors, and i ll do next time, i ll be so glad to do it, to be a part of this contest, cause i think it is a great idea !!!) . I worked graphics solutions for historical books of my city ( it is a serious matter ), and poetry books, and novels...graphic and txt, and also the biggest nonsense such as CD covers for punk bands. And trust me, you're wrong . Also, tastes are different (agree), but the taste requires experience and hearing. It should not hear the noise, and hear in silence. ------ 1. The first operation is simply not good enough, no message, picture says nothing, closed one-dimensional story. As labels for jars of fresh apples. see smiley here ???? so this is reality. 2. drinkndrive. work that has a story, witty. The work, which marks a funny event. This image is sure Excellent. The image quality is much better. 3. not bad, but not good enough, but a little better then movie flayer. 4. cool, so cool 5. sick. unimaginative. reminiscent of the failed stupid cartoons. Author is 5 y old??? 6. miniature (like the Japanese haiku poetry) includes several elements: the man, fear, ridiculous fear, not many views, but art is thin and it disqualifies that picture. But idea is not fully original, 7. transformers. Cool idea. art is excellent. (If this is independent work that is not copy and paste, then it is GREAT). It has caught the moment, modeling and posing. and battle. Maybe he could slip and a few words. 8. are you serious???? 9. junkimaster. This is an example of how to connect things, great. GREAT !!!! GAME and GAME. 10. This is something you should think of. This picture is 10000 times better than your first pick. THIS IS THE ORIGINAL IDEA. O R I G I N A L !!! ------------------- I also saw on the forum, one competitor who mentioned rules, was not entirely right. ------------------------------------ Picture: Hornet and Farting man is vulgar, but the details of the story is better then your 1st. Funnier, more interesting, and much more related and essential details but the poster for the movie (fart-beans, small pictures of those killed tanks, chat). But this is not SICK like railgun decapitation. And that is why I would like you to put links of all the images that were in the competition. This is my opinion. so you finish your story as much as you want. U can to continue to collect easy points from kids here.

First "look" is joke u see smile!!! Second, it is so easy and just NOT original idea (some people think that too). Nothing special here, we saw 1000000 time that someone change a movie flayer - picture for background (photo, or so), he cuts some tank and pasted it, use a PHOTOGRAPHY again to change a head and paste it all, use Sketch - Graphic Pen for gradient and CHANGE THE TEXT (director..costumes..) NOTHING SPECIAL here. And some kind of rough paper (u can do it with light effects). HE did nothing original. MAN Do something by your self (ART=0) Idea cool but we know it. that is all... Example of art is PanzerDiv_SS, Example of good fun and joke is drinkndrive (someone told us that here and i agree) And here on the forum one was way better... And I think there were a lot of good works (and way better), but you did not know to notice it.