Personally i do consider Viking very dangerous in experienced hands, but prefer Hunter anytime. If your playing style is agressive and you are able to make use of extra speed and turning speed, Viking simply cannot match Hunters versaitility at roughly the same armour.

VIKING vs HUNTER Hello all. I am thinking about buying one of these M1. Many people praise Viking, for it's versatility, but i cannot see any advantages over Hunter. In fact, Hunter is a faster M1 at the same health. Also better looking.. M2 yes Viking has 30 more health points, but it is also slower. Hunter may be slightly more expensive, but better value imo. What you guys think?