All bugs have been reported, thank you!

All bugs have been reported, thank you!

Topic merged.

Topic ownership transferred from @Arcade to @Lightshot upon request.

All bugs have been reported, thank you!

Thread approved

Sadly only the Technical Support team is capable of solving this issue. Since we cannot assist you, we'll close this topic. Thread closed.

Topic moved.

Topic moved.

All bugs have been reported, thank you!

Topic merged. Definitely worth it if you got the crystals.

Post moved.

Topic's ownership changed upon request.

Camping is fair, if you're a good player you can counter it, simple as that. Your point doesn't stand, that's all.

No, you didn't. Your explanation is that camping is considered cheating because you consider camping as an act of dishonestly, however you're the only one who actually considers it as such, all the experienced XP/BP players don't consider it as such.

Camping isn't cheating, it's just another play style. One can be aggressive and another player can be a camper. The reason why camping is seen as a negative act is because you take less risks when playing, some would say it's the best way to win your battles. Now, is it cheating? Nope, not even close. Is it fun? I'd say it's not as fun, but cheating? Nope.

It's more than possible, I'll attach a video in the upcoming days. Negative connotation ≠ cheating. Please, don't try to lecture me about XP/BP. It has never been considered as cheating, just a boring strategy. Hack/cheat would imply that one uses a third party software to make the hull act in a way it shouldn't, whereas its overdrive allows you to do something that wasn't possible before. If we use your logic, almost anything that's currently in the game is "legal hack", which, as you can see, is wrong.

Tracked hulls can do it too so this point is invalid. Since when is camping a form of cheating? Camping is fair it's just seen as a boring strategy by the community. Gotcha or not?

Is it considered to act dishonestly if a player decides to equip a hull that has a better overdrive? Is it unfair? Do all players have the play the game according to how TargetXAcquired wants them to play it? The answer is no, Tracked hulls ≠ Hovering hulls. You cannot expect them to behave the same way. Whether they fit into the game or not is a different matter.

Then I'm afraid the problem is on your side ? Not much of a point having a discussion if the other side can't read and then reply properly to the other party's messages. I would "back the players up" if I were to agree with what you said, in this case I don't. As I said earlier, yes Paladin (and the rest of the hovering hulls) have an advantage over regular hulls. No, it's not a hack or anything.

Easier does not meet guaranteed win, and if you were to read my full post you'd have seen that's exactly what I said. There's no such thing as 'legal cheat'. You can find the definition of the word cheat below; These things were not possible in the earlier days of tanki, true, however shooting rapidly with turrets such as Railgun and Thunder wasn't a thing earlier, but I don't see anyone complaining about 'cheater Vikings' or anything of this sort.

Nothing's stopping you from doing so ? Yes, hovering hulls do have a huge advantage over regular hulls, no it probably won't change. Although I don't use hovering hulls that much anymore, mainly Viking. Point is you don't really need them to win.

You'll also lose your account in the process, but that's just a minor detail.

Topic moved. This question cannot be answered at this point as the update wasn't released, you can either ask it here and hope this question will be selected for the next Q&A Blitz or wait for the update to be released. I'll move the topic to Game Discussion just for the sake of the discussion, theories about what might happen can be interesting for some of us.

If support did not reply up until now, please send me a Forum PM with the ticket number and I'll take a look. Thread closed & archived.