That might be an explanation. Vulcan has a tendency to overshadow everything else excepte Freeze, Firebird, and Isida. I really hadn't realized you got credit for a partial kill. I thought I read somewhere that the final shot got the credit for the kill, but based on this score/picture, partial credit ofr kills must exist. (If I did steal this guys kills, I didn't really mean too...heat of the battle and all). Can anyone confirm this? ...That you are awarded credit for contributing to an opponent's demise even though you didn't actually cause his final blow-up?

OK, then I'll change my question: Why is his score higher? We were in the game the same amount of time, I made more kills and died less, and we had somewhat comparable equipment. What could he possibly have done to generate a higher score than me when I killed more and died less? Why is he in first place...what could he have done to score/place higher than me?

Pavel020210 was a Rico/Hunter. Taco.Bell (me) was a Vulcan/Viking. We both started from the beginning of the game and neither of us changed equipment (no Isida). Taco.Bell is higher rank, made more kills, and died less. Why is my score/reward smaller than Pavel020210? I've seen this before and suspected it in much larger more lucrative games...I do better but don't get the credit (not always of course). Can anyone shed some light on the phenomenon?

I really don't believe Hazel-Rah cares what we think. This will be implemented no matter what. When Tanki is decimated, Hazel-Rah will blame it on Flash and take none of the blame. Tanki is in a bad downward spiral due to the persistent degrading of the game through foolish changes and negative updates. It is almost like they are trying to destroy the game. My guess is that Hazel-Rah has pitched the money people that Tanki needs to go mobile or it will die and in the process of converting, he will kill Tanki Online. Greed vs Quality.