I SAID NO!!!

what do you mean, you'd have to see it too? he did not say he'd have to see it.. he only asked for details and requested for me to show it to him. and i already said i can't show it so no point in asking again, either use your imagination or get out. basically this is what it'd look like, except you replace the liver with moving tesseract(s) like the one in that gif. everything around the tesseracts will seem as though it's just transparent empty space. this way, the fact that it looks like it is within something already perceived as 3 dimensional helps the brain to assume the 3rd dimension in on something 2 dimensional automatically.

i think it's very stupid that there's a countdown at all... i mean, if it's immune to it's own damage then what's the point of the countdown?? If they wanna make it immune to it's own bomb then they should just remove the countdown and let it explode instantly

no I'm sorry but I can't.. but I was thinking that instead of the paint covering the surface of the tank, they could make it look like it is within the tank like this : except that you replace it with a hypercube(s)

our brain already automatcally processes the world in 11 dimensions. our sense of reality is already based on 11 dimensions https://nypost.com/2017/06/13/the-human-brain-sees-the-world-as-an-11-dimensional-multiverse/ as such, we can create structures up to 11 dimensions https://www.sciencealert.com/science-discovers-human-brain-works-up-to-11-dimensions https://bigthink.com/paul-ratner/our-brains-think-in-11-dimensions-discover-scientists and because of this, we can also think in 4 or more dimensions https://www.forbes.com/sites/quora/2016/12/07/einstein-could-easily-think-in-four-dimensions-and-its-a-skill-most-people-can-train/#13b5024b34fd as for making a 4 space in a 2 space, I know that is impossible. but that wasn't what i was talking about. what I was talking about was to make something to trick/help the brain in seeing 4 dimensions. just like how we can already trick the brain into seeing 3 dimensions in 2 dimensions. that gif did it. and for the paint it'd be easier because it'd be in something already perceived as 3 space.

haven't I already uploaded that tesseract gif 4 times?

nooooob

our physical being is restricted to 3 space... but not our minds computers can process data in the form of a hypercube... and the brain is proven to be more powerful than any supercomputer

yeah really, why don't you explain it then :lol: btw I was talking in terms of geometry, and not computing or unified theory of everything I understand that the surface of the tank is still 2 dimensional, but because the tank itself is 3 dimensional, they won't have to draw as much to depict the depth dimension. because it is easier to picture a 4 dimensional object if it is within a 3 dimensional object rather than a 2 dimensional one. yes, i know that the tank is really 2 dimensional but it is already depicted as 3 dimensional. so it should be easier to depict something 4 dimensional in 2 dimensions if we depict it inside something that's depicted as 3 dimensional. because when they see that's it's inside something 3 dimensional they already assume the possibility of a 3rd dimension. and this means less lines and effects would be needed to help them see it. also, what exactly do you mean by "the fourth dimension"? which one? IN what? relative time? spacetime? there is no "4th dimension" in everything. whatever is your "4th dimension" depends on which other dimension you need to take into account. because there is an infinite number of dimensions so any one could be the 4th. In M theory they use 11 dimensions, in superstring they use 10, in bosonic string they use 26.

I don't think it'd take too much effort to make a paint like that gif. maybe it's gonna cost them some time and money but... wouldn't you agree that a real tesseract is so mind blowing that a lot of people would pay 100 euros for an animated paint wit real tesseracts? just look at how many people spent money for some stupid screaming faces or blinking eyes... imagina how much money they could make from a paint that depicts 4 dimensions

it is possible, as the tank is already 3 dimensional so all they have to do is add 1 more dimension if they can show 4 dimensions in that 2 dimensional gif i don't see how they can't show 4 dimensions on a 3 dimensional tank they could be more artistic and do a proper one. or at least not make something so clearly 3 dimensional and call it a tesseract. like really, squares are 2 dimensional so overlapping squares only makes it 3 dimensional.

should i save for dictator or godofwar? I am usually the arsehole in my team. if i see a teammate playing badly i push or flip him if i have the chance if my team is lousy then i just sabotage them because they deserve to lose

it's clear now. he's deliberately ignoring us. cause he could move this to archive but not reply. flexoo is a terrible person and organizer

show me a real hypercube (or at least a real tesseract) when the paint hypercube was released i didn't have much to complain about because it wasn't animated so it would be very hard to show any real hypercubes it. then they released the tesseract paint... it was animated yet they couldn't even show a proper tesseract. I don't understand what's so hard with that. my idea is to change the name of tesseract camo to something else and make a real tesseract animated paint. I know it probably doesn't matter for most because they don't even know what tesseract or hypercube is but i just want something called a tesseract to look like one. besides, a real tesseract looks alot better than whatever they are trying to pass off as one so i think my idea can help the game make money. just look at this beauty

actually, aftrer thinking about string theory for a while... I think maybe they're gonna discard it soon. because for now they just keep on adding dimensions for it to work... It's not like i think they will realise that string theory is wrong but rather i think that they will come up with another theory derived from what they have gotten from string theory. so i think that soon it will be whatever they call this string theory 2.0 vs loop quantum gravity...