All I'm doing is just asking for all maps to be considered, balance in games, and ability to choose the time a battle goes for, surely that's not too much to ask for...

@HateIt would be good if a mod could share their opinion on this. I believe many people not only are not fans of matchmaking but despise it. Firstly, if you look at just the number of people playing the game, there used to consistently be 100-120k+ playing at once and now there they are lucky to hit 20k at a peak hour in the day during a festival. The reason for the decrease in players may not entirely be matchmaking, but it sure as hell did not help the cause. Secondly, there are people that put hours into creating a map and if you are not gonna use certain maps like Siege, Lost Temple and some of the extremely popular older ones, what is the point of them? Thirdly, you guys always seem to argue, "No oNE WaNtS to WoRRy AbOuT WhiCH MaP To ChoOSE" but you guys could not be further off the truth, as I have spoken to many players on this matter, they want to have the luxury to choose a map that best suits their equipment and that does not have a battle that is already over or extremely unbalanced. I kindly want to propose a suggestion to the developers, they have chosen to separate the 2 types of battles into Pro and MM. However, it think it would be a better idea to actually bring a small aspect of pro battles in MM, time and map selection. This way, you include the people that "want to get into a battle as quick as possible for any mode" and the people that want to choose their battles while not letting certain maps die. The funds should be the way matchmaking already is. Now in terms of restrictions, you could still have pro battles for the really picky people that don't want drugs, etc.. As for the people that abuse this system, the answer is simple, just discipline them and these players only account for very small portion of the game.

I just have a complaint about the use of maps. Some of the best maps in the game that were very popular and took time to make are just being wasted.

It would be good if a mod could share their opinion on this. I believe many people not only are not fans of matchmaking but despise it. Firstly, if you look at just the number of people playing the game, there used to consistently be 100-120k+ playing at once and now there they are lucky to hit 20k at a peak hour in the day during a festival. The reason for the decrease in players may not entirely be matchmaking, but it sure as hell did not help the cause. Secondly, there are people that put hours into creating a map and if you are not gonna use certain maps like Siege, Lost Temple and some of the extremely popular older ones, what is the point of them? Thirdly, you guys always seem to argue, "No oNE WaNtS to WoRRy AbOuT WhiCH MaP To ChoOSE" but you guys could not be further off the truth, as I have spoken to many players on this matter, they want to have the luxury to choose a map that best suits their equipment and that does not have a battle that is already over or extremely unbalanced. I kindly want to propose a suggestion to the developers, they have chosen to separate the 2 types of battles into Pro and MM. However, it think it would be a better idea to actually bring a small aspect of pro battles in MM, time and map selection. This way, you include the people that "want to get into a battle as quick as possible for any mode" and the people that want to choose their battles while not letting certain maps die. The funds should be the way matchmaking already is. Now in terms of restrictions, you could still have pro battles for the really picky people that don't want drugs, etc.. As for the people that abuse this system, the answer is simple, just discipline them and these players only account for very small portion of the game.

It would be good if a mod could share their opinion on this. I believe many people not only hate matchmaking but despise it. Firstly, if you look at just the number of people playing the game, there used to consistently be 100-120k+ playing at once and now there they are lucky to hit 20k at a peak hour in the day during a festival. The reason for the decrease in players may not entirely be matchmaking, but it sure as hell did not help the cause. Secondly, there are people that put hours into creating a map and if you are not gonna use certain maps like Siege, Lost Temple and some of the extremely popular older ones, what is the point of them? Thirdly, you guys always seem to argue, "No oNE WaNtS to WoRRy AbOuT WhiCH MaP To ChoOSE" but you guys could not be further off the truth, as I have spoken to many players on this matter, they want to have the luxury to choose a map that best suits their equipment and that does not have a battle that is already over or extremely unbalanced. I kindly want to propose a suggestion to the developers, they have chosen to separate the 2 types of battles into Pro and MM. However, it think it would be a better idea to actually allow the choice for maps and possibly time of battle in MM. This way, you include the people that "want to get into a battle as quick as possible for any mode" and the people that want to choose their battles while not letting certain maps die. The funds should be the way matchmaking already is. Now in terms of restrictions, you could still have pro battles for the really picky people that don't want drugs, etc..

Thank you, I saw that on the Wiki but wasn't sure after I was told otherwise in battle chat.

At which rank are the mk7 product kits for crystals available? I am currently major general and I was wondering...