Jump to content
EN
Play

Forum

Needle vs Emerald


 Share

Recommended Posts

I want to confirm, since I don't have those paints, that Needle gives +2 (and +3 equip on Mamoth M3) against thunder M3. Same goes for Emerald. If Needle gives +2 against Thunder I wonder why it costs just 10k, against the 15k needed for Emerald, which has basically the same Thunder protection and worse second protections (who needs 30% smoky and twins).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think this example is the same of Clay (30% aganist rico) vs Zeus (40% aganist rico) ....

Zeus costs 5k crystals more and its protections (isida and firebird) aren't the best but you have to think that a Zeus will beat Clay aganist rico... every times :)

ciao

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know the reasons behind the pricing, I think Needle is way OP'd for it's price. Then again, I think the same of Rock and Prodigi, so maybe it's the 15k paints that are overpriced. I don't know the reasons behind the pricings, but I'd certainly buy Needle over Emerald even if they were the same price.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think this example is the same of Clay (30% aganist rico) vs Zeus (40% aganist rico) ....

Zeus costs 5k crystals more and its protections (isida and firebird) aren't the best but you have to think that a Zeus will beat Clay aganist rico... every times :)

ciao

 

Il problema qua è che mi sembra, visto che non ho ancora visto una risposta, che Needle faccia sopravvivere un Hornet/Viking/Mammoth lo stesso numero di colpi che garantisce l'Emerald. Solo che ci sono 5K differenza e la protezione secondaria dell'Emerald è praticamente inutile rispetto a quella del Needle.

 

---

 

So Needle makes you survive the same amount of Thunder shots as Emerald? I think Emerald needs at least some improvement on the second protection (like tier 1.5/2), as now it's totally not worth 15K.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I want to confirm' date=' since I don't have those paints, that Needle gives +2 (and +3 equip on Mamoth M3) against thunder M3. Same goes for Emerald. If Needle gives +2 against Thunder I wonder why it costs just 10k, against the 15k needed for Emerald, which has basically the same Thunder protection and worse second protections (who needs 30% smoky and twins). [/quote']

I agree with you on this one :D. I believe some of the expensive paints have become a complete and total rip-off since the update on the 12th of April, the day Tanki put a limit on the rank-creation of battles.

 

Emerald is a perfect example of such a paint. Most battles used to be filled with tier 1 guns as well, but since the update that's history. People bought their paints with certain expectations, but have been mislead. I'm lucky I'm not one of them, otherwise it would be crystals down the drain...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I want to confirm' date=' since I don't have those paints, that Needle gives +2 (and +3 equip on Mamoth M3) against thunder M3. Same goes for Emerald. If Needle gives +2 against Thunder I wonder why it costs just 10k, against the 15k needed for Emerald, which has basically the same Thunder protection and worse second protections (who needs 30% smoky and twins). [/quote']

I agree with you on this one :D. I believe some of the expensive paints have become a complete and total rip-off since the update on the 12th of April, the day Tanki put a limit on the rank-creation of battles.

 

Emerald is a perfect example of such a paint. Most battles used to be filled with tier 1 guns as well, but since the update that's history. People bought their paints with certain expectations, but have been mislead. I'm lucky I'm not one of them, otherwise it would be crystals down the drain...

 

I agree to me the 15000 paints are more like a choice of what weapon do you hate getting killed by and do you really want this their are paints that are near that protection and cheaper.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Needle, definitely. It has protection against three commonly used weapons-- Thunder (30%), Ricochet (15%), and Railgun (10%).

 

Emerald has protection against twins, smoky, and thunder. The only good thing about that paint is the 40% against Thunder.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Needle, definitely. It has protection against three commonly used weapons-- Thunder (30%), Ricochet (15%), and Railgun (10%).

 

Emerald has protection against twins, smoky, and thunder. The only good thing about that paint is the 40% against Thunder.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I want to confirm' date=' since I don't have those paints, that Needle gives +2 (and +3 equip on Mamoth M3) against thunder M3. Same goes for Emerald. If Needle gives +2 against Thunder I wonder why it costs just 10k, against the 15k needed for Emerald, which has basically the same Thunder protection and worse second protections (who needs 30% smoky and twins). [/quote']

 

Needle gives +1(except on mammy (+2)), Emerald +2. This is at max damage from a thunder, but max damage doesn't usually happen, so they could both increase by 1.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought Needle gave +2 against Thunder because I've seen Vikings survive 6 shots (kill in 7) and sometimes Hornets 4 shots (kill in 5).

 

Normally, my Needle and M3 Vik gives me +2. At maximum damage, however, it only gives +1.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Needle is possibly the best pro-paint (most common in TOF and other no supply games). From my personal experience, I have used needle a lot more than emerald. Moreover, the total protection it gives from tier 2 weapons is 45% (30+15) which is only 2nd best to Inferno and python (50% each). It could easily have been a 15k paint. :wink:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i disagree with mister Julius Cesar Needle is a good paint but protection is weak.

 

Protection is weak? Yet it's a good paint? What's good about it, the looks? Really? All Emerald has extra than Needle is survival from one more Thunder hit. That is all. Needle has Ricochet and Railgun protection on top of its thunder. Emerald has nothing, only thunder. And costs 5,000 crystals more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd say Needle, Prodigi, Rock, Clay, Storm, Python are pretty much all the paints one needs....

 

EDIT: Mary... I forgot Mary....

 

Lead is handy. And there is no point for Storm or Rock once you have python. You also forgot In Love. :roll:

 

needle = 15 protection rico

10 rail

is that much skitee? :roll:

 

No. But using your logic, neither is the 10% protection advance from Needle to Emerald. And if that isn't much, then why waste 5,000 crystals on something which is not much better?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Today i did a test. This test was made with a thunder M3 against a Mammoth M3 with different paints.

Shots to kill a Mammoth M3 with Corrosion: 7

Shots to kill a Mammoth M3 with Prodigi: 8

Shots to kill a Mammoth M3 with Needle: 8

Shots to kill a Mammoth M3 with Emerald: 9

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Today i did a test. This test was made with a thunder M3 against a Mammoth M3 with different paints.

Shots to kill a Mammoth M3 with Corrosion: 7

Shots to kill a Mammoth M3 with Prodigi: 8

Shots to kill a Mammoth M3 with Needle: 8

Shots to kill a Mammoth M3 with Emerald: 9

And what about Rustle?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...