New Scoring System???

[happy_creepers 9]

i can't help but notice the new scoring system. before, you earn more experience for destroying higher ranks. now, you always earn ten. i really wish they would change it back, because the new system makes going to challenging battles obsolete. :(

[feeshes 0]

teh new scoring system sucks! I really think the old one was a lot better. :( :( :(

[mchen 162]

Its not too bad, the main purpose of the new system was to make it fair for higher ranking players to get more points. A marshal killing a master corporal in the old system would have only got him 2 points but if a master corporal killed the marshal, I think it would have got about 15 points which is the reason why it is unfair.

However, you guys are saying that we should go back to the old system and there really isn't much reason to do that. Mainly lower ranked players miss the old system because they could kill warrant officers etc. and get tons of points but you've got to make the game fair for both sides so the newer system in my opinion is better.

I think another reason for it is probably because of the fact that lower ranked hackers couldn't get as much points as they use to for plaing in games with marshals or hackers that could use power hacks to make their turret one shot kill no matter what tank they are facing

[j0keer 3]

Its not too bad, the main purpose of the new system was to make it fair for higher ranking players to get more points. A marshal killing a master corporal in the old system would have only got him 2 points but if a master corporal killed the marshal, I think it would have got about 15 points which is the reason why it is unfair.

However, you guys are saying that we should go back to the old system and there really isn't much reason to do that. Mainly lower ranked players miss the old system because they could kill warrant officers etc. and get tons of points but you've got to make the game fair for both sides so the newer system in my opinion is better.

I think another reason for it is probably because of the fact that lower ranked hackers couldn't get as much points as they use to for plaing in games with marshals or hackers that could use power hacks to make their turret one shot kill no matter what tank they are facing

 

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

[r_KFUPM0 5]

Its not too bad, the main purpose of the new system was to make it fair for higher ranking players to get more points. A marshal killing a master corporal in the old system would have only got him 2 points but if a master corporal killed the marshal, I think it would have got about 15 points which is the reason why it is unfair.

However, you guys are saying that we should go back to the old system and there really isn't much reason to do that. Mainly lower ranked players miss the old system because they could kill warrant officers etc. and get tons of points but you've got to make the game fair for both sides so the newer system in my opinion is better.

I think another reason for it is probably because of the fact that lower ranked hackers couldn't get as much points as they use to for plaing in games with marshals or hackers that could use power hacks to make their turret one shot kill no matter what tank they are facing

 

yes but the marshal would have better hulls and guns so he will kill more and they will be equal.

[a7x_Pedro48 13,999]

The new system is correct.

[r_EddyBeGood0 45]

Moved to general for discussion

[Tommy60 406]

Eddy, you messed up the forums again! :P

[300noobs 0]

Its not too bad, the main purpose of the new system was to make it fair for higher ranking players to get more points. A marshal killing a master corporal in the old system would have only got him 2 points but if a master corporal killed the marshal, I think it would have got about 15 points which is the reason why it is unfair.

However, you guys are saying that we should go back to the old system and there really isn't much reason to do that. Mainly lower ranked players miss the old system because they could kill warrant officers etc. and get tons of points but you've got to make the game fair for both sides so the newer system in my opinion is better.

I think another reason for it is probably because of the fact that lower ranked hackers couldn't get as much points as they use to for plaing in games with marshals or hackers that could use power hacks to make their turret one shot kill no matter what tank they are facing

 

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

new system make high rankers target low rankers even more now. why would they kill a hard target when they could get the same reward for killing easy target.

i'm a low ranker in this account and get shot at a lot by guys that higher than me 5 ranks...i still managed to get to top place in the board but it really anoying when you become a meat...i mean...metal shield in team matches.

[splitterpoint 10,986]

Personally I would care less when the new system was implented.

Now I can gain more crystals in one single rank... thus a better tank at lower levels. 8)

[mchen 162]

Its not really too bad for me at the moment because all my accounts are warrant officers but however, I too was at first WHAT because my accounts would not fair well against lieutenants and above. I think that a lot of people's initial reaction is this because of the fact that most people are no where near that high of a rank and to prove this tanki even made it possible to make sure you could buy exp till a certain level.

But I think that if you look into the matter a bit deeper, it's just made the game a lot fairer in my opinion. First of all lower ranked tanks that drug a lot that are say ranked sergeant major( that have m3 railgun) in a game with warrant officers would have dominated in the old system extremely fell because they could get like 13 points for a kill however if a warrant officer 3 or 4 killed it , then they would only get about 6 or 7 points making life a lot harder.

Now after making the points above, you might say that experience and level is a factor because the higher ranked you are, the more easily you should be able to kill players so SHOULD be able to get back their points with ease. Now this is where it's unfair on marshals and high ranked players. Third lieutenants can get m3 rico and m3 viking so should be able to compete with marshals should they get the same guns as ricochet is quite a common gun and a good one so marshals would still be at another disadvantage.

[GENERATOR2142 17]

Its Good and its bad

Good becuase: allows "better" tankers to kill worse tankers and still get more points.

Bad: You wont get rewarded so much when you kill a better tank like on the old system you could get even 17 points from killing a better tanker but now its 10 from all tanks (unless you have xp multiplier)

 

So I would say that this should be updated the way that the minimum amount of points could be 10 and it would go up to 20 with the amount of differenve on the ratings.

[tankcalm 324]

i think the idea behind this it's play battles around your rank. More competitives and hard battles. Now is not profitable at lower ranks enter in battles available for ranks above them, except buyers, of course.

[mchen 162]

Yeah and I think the idea is helped since the game made some of the maps only for third lieutenants and above