If you are owner of match,you can kick/ban

[r_Marios0 4]

There should be that you made a match and you are a mod of it. You can kick people from it,and ban them (Banning them prepents them from getting in your match-A message will show them that they are banned if they had go in and had got banned) and, you have a list of banned people. To see it use shift.Only the owner of his match can view list of banned players and un-ban players from it by viewing it,and using the command that is needed to un-ban people.

Commands:

/kick player (Kicks that player out of the match)

/ban player (Bans the player making the player not having access to the match untill he is un-banned from it-A message shows on screen when he is un-banned)

/unban player (Un-bans the player that is banned, giving back to the player access to get in)

[r_mehdadoo0 0]

I think there is a feature like voting to kick or ban a tanker in tankionline version 2.0;

 

But you can submit your idea for a deeper discussion at Feedback Page

[cablaz 32]

but what if this M3 railer just keeps pissing people off by killing them to much but thats the point! killing and them everybody is gona vote to kick him out isn't that kinda cheap?

[MadDog21 230]

Nonsense! With the immaturity of far too many this'd simply be a clique with a big club. Getting popped too much by a good player? Kick 'em! Don't like someone's chat? Kick 'em! Get near the end and want the awards to be split less? Kick 'em. Might be a grand idea if one likes tyranny. If not, the notion stinks.

[Slickdc 1]

This would not work at all because once the game gets to the end, the leader can just kick and ban all of the players and then have all of the battle funds to themselves. Also, snipers on the enemy team would get kicked a lot and they would get no crystals for playing. This feature would just make a lot of people angry and cause them to quit.

[r_PhantomMeat0 20]

now that i think about it i like the idea but majority rules....but you cant kick the other team only your team

and more than 5 players in your team need to rule him to go out,and if its a unfair kick the person could report

it and get the person banned from playing tanki for 3days or something

[SalvadorSTM 20]

Nonsense! With the immaturity of far too many this'd simply be a clique with a big club. Getting popped too much by a good player? Kick 'em! Don't like someone's chat? Kick 'em! Get near the end and want the awards to be split less? Kick 'em. Might be a grand idea if one likes tyranny. If not' date=' the notion stinks.[/quote'] TOTALLY AGREE WITH YOU!!! :D :D :D :D its not fair to the people who are winning... maybe the winning people are going to get banned.... is they have worked very hard and are at the best then they get banned or kicked whats up with that .... :x :x :x :x

[r_therussian0 47]

Hey. We have plans to make this happen, but its kinda hard because there is a lot of space for abuse. We are planning on implementing an ability to kick players through a team vote in a next few months. Stay tuned.

[Ultradc 9]

please don't do anything. its fine how it is.

[r_pwn0 1]

i dont like this idea, the owner could kick everybody in last minute and get all crystals. besides, the people who are doing well and destroying lots of tanks could be banned just because the owner is a total n00b and is jealous/angry

[r_Justen0 9]

Hey. We have plans to make this happen' date=' but its kinda hard because there is a lot of space for abuse. We are planning on implementing an ability to kick players through a team vote in a next few months. Stay tuned.[/quote']

team vote sounds good... I mean, what happens if there is like... 5 seconds left in the game, and you kick everyone on your team, and you're winning? You get the pot, and everything.

Maybe, no kicking or joining in the last 5 minutes of the game? Whats the point of joining with 5 minutes left? you're not going to get anything anyways... maybe a handful of kills, but you won't get crystals

[r_Marios0 4]

Ok,ok. Then it will be vote kick/ban. Or it does not count if owner kicks/bans everyone. He must pay 500 clystals if the kicks/bans everyone all the time. As it goes again and again, he must pay more and more clystals then he trought!

[Antynik 0]

kickers should have a right not a owner, and the best 3 players.

and only the worst players on their team.

[r_Fiasco0 7]

Dumbest idea ever noobs. IF you have ever played stick arena, you know that when your crushing people thye quit. People would only abuse. And why do you need to kick already? you want to kick because that guy is owning you, which makes you an abuser.

[cablaz 32]

and the team vote what if ur whole team is losing and they all vote to kick everybody on enemy out?

[Bulava10 0]

I am not sure how it's gonna be implemented.

I assume the reason behind that there are, time to times, inadequate players who are making the team look bad (don't contribute to the battle, are rude and etc...)

But how precisely that will be measured to be enough to kick someone off the game - I have no idea....

 

I think there are few constraints to be put in place to avoid "unfair business" like you can't kick off anyone from the top 3-5 players of your team, you need to have a "good" profile to be able to vote (remember they will make profiles in v2), and there should be some penalties if the player has been kicked off with no valid reason (of course, there should be some techniques how to prove this though :) ).

 

I don't do anything yet with this, as it is better to see how it will look like and then make the suggestion to improve later if you know how to. I found that if there are legitimate complaints (justified and in common sense) the developers will response to it appropriatelly.

[Slickdc 1]

I know that if someone on the enemy team is spamming items and the entire opposing team isn't and getting destroyed that they will want to kick the player using items. That wouldn't be fair at all because items are limited and some people pay for them. I understand that there are some reasons for players to be kicked, but I'm not sure if it is possible to make a system that doesn't allow for any abuse. It's not like the game can tell if a player should be kicked or not and can tell when there are people abusing the system. You can't do a unanimous vote either because what if the trouble maker has a friend on the same team. That friend would always vote no.

 

All I know is, that when the battle funds are high, it would absolutely infuriate a skillful and fair player who is in first place if they were to get kicked from a game just for being in first place and just because they would get a majority of the battle funds. That just wouldn't be right.

[arun24680 0]

_thanks

[ronen93 46]

Congratulations for necro-posting, sir! So really, stop bumming old topic!

[JamesM10 14]

Outdated.

 

Thread closed.