complain about one of rules !

[r_Aminoooo0 2]

hi all administrators and moderators.I have a question about this :

as i saw Rules ( 2.3 ) if we put something more than 4-5 times we will ban because of flooding

but i want to know why some moderators ban you because of your 2-3 times repetitive writing ????????

it is strange and it is against the rule 2.3 !!!!!!

if i am right please notice your moderators that don't ban !!!!!

thanks u for your guiding.

[FederalBureauFBI 2,881]

as i saw Rules ( 2.3 ) if we put something more than 4-5 times we will ban because of flooding

but i want to know why some moderators ban you because of your 2-3 times repetitive writing ????????

You should have read the rule more carefully before creating this topic.

 

The '4-5' you're talking about is for punctuation:

 

using more than 5 identical punctuation marks, symbols or letters in a row

 

But if you post several similar posts in a row, like you say - 'repetitive', you will be banned.

Do you understand now?

 

but i want to know why some moderators ban you because of your 2-3 times repetitive writing ????????

it is strange and it is against the rule 2.3 !!!!!!

if i am right please notice your moderators that don't ban !!!!!

Remember that Moderators also have their own rules and they follow them. They don't ban because 'they want to', or 'for no reason'.

 

P.S. Why don't you read Rule 2.18? Public discussions about Moderators' work is forbidden and you did exactly that.

Edited February 22, 2013 by FederalBureauFBI

[SuperPenguin 6]

I vote 2.18 is a dumb rule because that makes y'all immune from criticism....

[SilentShadow 104]

I vote 2.18 is a dumb rule because that makes y'all immune from criticism....

 

The rule is to avoid controversy and many topics about it, and to keep any affairs private to the affected rather than bring the whole community in.

[GoldRock 6,165]

The rule is to avoid controversy and many topics about it, and to keep any affairs private to the affected rather than bring the whole community in.

But still... Maybe they shouldn't lock the discussion topics for updates (this would avoid the 'many topics' of controversy), for the affected in that case are all of the players of Tanki! Therefore, most affairs are a matter for the whole community, and so you don't exactly have me convinced here... Though I agree that people shouldn't make topics complaining about the moderation simply due to their own private experiences with them.

Edited February 22, 2013 by GoldRock

[SilentShadow 104]

I agree with your point, but I would like to point out:

 

Maybe they shouldn't lock the discussion topics for updates (this would avoid the 'many topics' of controversy), for the affected in that case are all of the players of Tanki!

 

That they did not close it because it was a discussion beyond any sort of what's allowed;

They closed it because it was under siege by those who flame and flood with the message "we don't want update 123" with multiple accounts.

Edited February 22, 2013 by SilentShadow

[GoldRock 6,165]

I agree with your point, but I would like to point out:

 

 

 

That they did not close it because it was a discussion beyond any sort of what's allowed;

They closed it because it was under siege by those who flame and flood with the message "we don't want update 123" with multiple accounts.

True, I completely agree, but if that happens, just delete the topic and make a new (official) one! Or simply delete any useless posts by multiple accounts in the topic, then ban the multiple accounts.

[r_Aminoooo0 2]

P.S. Why don't you read Rule 2.18? Public discussions about Moderators' work is forbidden and you did exactly that.

ok tnx a lot Federal i got it now ;) !!!!!

because i was banned 2-3 times because of repetitive links but it was 2 times and i was banned.