Railgun or Thunder?

[r_R3APER0 16]

which do you guys think is better, railgun or thunder? assume m3 for both, but you can base if off what you are using, be it m0, or any other levels

[faisal70 7]

thunder becose its storng and fast than rail gun

[r_pwn0 1]

if you dont like railguns reload, go with thunder. i like railgun, because its damage doesnt decrease over long distance, it doesnt kill you with splash damage. (splash damage sucks, it gets you more deaths than kills) and its easier to aim.

[Tommy60 406]

Though thunder is 5 times more expensive, it does more damage faster than railgun. Still, railgun is for snipers who want to kill the enemy with 1 powerful blow before they know the sniper is sniping them. =P

[r_wiki240 0]

if you dont like railguns reload' date=' go with thunder. i like railgun, because its damage doesnt decrease over long distance, it doesnt kill you with splash damage. (splash damage sucks, it gets you more deaths than kills) and its easier to aim.[/quote']

 

splash dmg rockz!!! try to kill 3 or 4 tanks in same hit with rail... its possible if they are in same line and if u shhoting with drug hit ;))

[cablaz 32]

rail gun owns wait... SHAFT IS GONA OWN THUNDERS ASS BAD!!!

[Tommy60 406]

I hope so. It will probably come out in 2.0's release. Just think, maps like combe and sandbox might as well be open battlefields with no obstacles!

[r_D.e.X0 0]

Grom of course :mrgreen:

Конечно Гром :wink: