Viking Plataform

[XT-Gamma 0]

Hi, I'm Spanish and I speak English very badly, so I preferred to write in the google translator and translation of the posting here. So forgive if misspelled.

 

I write as the title indicates the viking platform. I chose the railgun weapon, and I like the platforms balanced between defense and speed, such as Viking or Dictator.

 

Well, looking at his stats, I noticed that the viking m3 is absolutely an insult. You pay about 200,000 crystals to upload anything longer than 12 health points and 0.5 points for speed. The Dictator compared to the m3 is clearly superior in speed and defense. It is true that a higher rank improved and you pay more, but it does not seem logical not "discriminate", so to speak somehow, the Viking.

 

Then you will say: and after this, as it has argued that it is certainly better the Dictator, why not choose? I would answer that the base structure and dynamics I like more, is cheaper and more improvement in lower ranges. The Dictator has a hump, is very high and less stable than the Viking. Besides improvements in pairs (m0 and m2) is less health points, at least. And to say that to the technique of "back door" (when you're behind a wall and shoot salts) always have to go back, while the Viking practically no difference. However, I check behind the m3 for the viking is harmful and insufficient. Honestly I think it's not worth not improve until the m3 is better to use for other things remaining crystals.

 

With this I just want to disagree with this, know the reason and if some solution could be applied or not. I for one would propose, give 250-260 health points or 7.0 speed, if only to compensate, and even I would not mind paying more or longer causes improvement in a higher rank.

 

Sincerely, XT-Gamma

 

 

Por si acaso pongo el texto original: (original text)

 

Hola, soy español y hablo ingles muy mal, por lo que he preferido escribir en el traductor de google y la traduccion la posteo aqui. Asi que perdonad si esta mal escrito.

 

Escribo como indica el titulo por la plataforma viking. He elegido el arma railgun, y me gustan las plataformas equilibradas entre la defensa y la velocidad, tales como Viking o Dictator.

 

Pues bien, mirando sus stats, me di cuenta de que en la m3 de viking es absolutamente un insulto. Pagas aproximadamente 200.000 cristales para subir nada mas que 12 puntos de salud y 0.5 puntos de velocidad. La Dictator en comparacion en la m3 resulta claramente superior tanto en velocidad como defensa. Es cierto que se mejora en un rango superior y que pagas mas, pero no me parece logico tampoco "discriminar", por decirlo de alguna manera, la Viking.

 

Entonces direis: y despues de esto, ya que has argumentado que es ciertamente algo mejor la Dictator, ¿porque no la eliges? Les contestaria que la estructura baja y dinamica me gusta mas, es mas barata y se mejora en rangos mas inferiores. La Dictator tiene joroba, es muy elevada y menos estable que la Viking. Ademas de que en las mejoras pares (m0 y m2) es inferior en puntos de salud, por lo menos. Y que decir que para hacer la tecnica de la "puerta atras" (cuando estas detras de una pared, sales y disparas) tienes que salir siempre de espaldas, mientras que con la Viking no hay practicamente diferencia. Sin embargo, me echa para atras que la m3 de la viking sea nefasta e insuficiente. Sinceramente creo que no merece la pena ni mejorarla hasta la m3, es mejor aprovechar para otras cosas los cristales restantes.

 

Con esto simplemente quiero mostrar mi desacuerdo con esto, conocer el motivo y si se podria aplicar alguna solucion o no. Yo por lo menos propondria, darle 250-260 puntos de salud o 7.0 velocidad, aunque sea para compensar, e incluso no me importaria pagar mas o que la mejora se produciera en un rango superior.

 

Atentamente, XT-Gamma

[0555819821 24]

There are bad sides to dictator... Such as its height Spanish: Hay cosas malas a dictador ... Tal como su altura

[dennyboy1505 4]

Dictator is more stable as people think. It looks like its not stable, but it definitely is. The M3 protection is really great, min point is the rank. And speed is superiour!

[UNDESIRABLE 147]

M3 dictator is great.

The only cons of it is its high price, high rank to unlock it, and having a high platform.

Other than that, dictator may well be one of the best tanks in the game

[dennyboy1505 4]

Frank, I think exactly the same. Arg, I wish I could buy xp again!!!

[Mr.SV.ENS 738]

One thing:

 

Dictator has easier possibility of hiding behind walls and coming out without being harmed that much because the gun is placed on its back whilst Viking has it almost in the middle like Hunter. This means, that Viking needs a bit more hp than Dictator; I'd recon swap the hp around...

I think the swapping part is really good, anyway I don't care that much as long as they don't touch my wasp' speed :ph34r:

[r_Firingsniper0 1,215]

Vik is good in their M1 stages, but if you upgrade it it sucks,

[splitterpoint 10,986]

 

With this I just want to disagree with this, know the reason and if some solution could be applied or not. I for one would propose, give 250-260 health points or 7.0 speed, if only to compensate, and even I would not mind paying more or longer causes improvement in a higher rank.

 

 

Post your propose in Feedback.