What do you think of current descriptions of turrets and hulls?

[AbsoluteZero 3,729]

Number 2 but it was very difficult to read from an English prospective. How about,

 

2. The idea of this Freeze weapon system was borne in a desolate, Russian village where a local inventor made "Freeze Thrower" out of a broken, old, Sever refrigerator and a Buran vacuum cleaner.  A professional engineer, when out fishing near the village, noticed this invention and took it to the Zhukov Research Institute. There, the clumsy freeze thrower became a formidable freeze gun. It showers the enemy with a chemical composition based on freon. Victims take on damage and their movements and processes become slower although a flow of fire can unfreeze a target.

 

2. The idea of Freeze weapon system was born in the desolate Russian village. Using old broken refrigerator "Sever" and vacuum cleaner "Buran" local inventor made "freeze thrower". Professional engineer who had been fishing near the village noticed this invention and brought it to the Zhukov Research Institute. There clumsy freeze thrower became formidable Freeze gun. It showers enemy with the chemical composition based on freon. Victim takes damage and all its movements and processes become slower. Though a flow of fire can unfreeze a target.

Edited July 5, 2013 by AbsoluteZero

[Finesse 968]

Description 2

[Mr.SV.ENS 738]

1, that way people in my team will finally know that freeze is able to UNFIREBIRD me.

[marexMARKO 5]

2

[hutyhutya 1]

of course, nobody read this... i think its not neccesary

[LETCHIK_WOLK 370]

Isn't number 2 the modified version of the current one in the game?

Edited July 4, 2013 by LETCHIK_WOLK

[amins19 7]

I thought it was about changing the shapes of guns , not a description blah blah blah

 

[MONKBLOB 33]

2, although the description could use some grammar and punctuation editing.

[ExtremeKiller26 443]

NUMBER 2 ALL THE WAY!

[Aero.v2.0 1,456]

2

[ousama21 0]

#2

[r_Davyd5430 0]

2

[FaaiqBilal1 795]

I like 3 and 4

Edited July 4, 2013 by FaaiqBilal1

[I.D0M 601]

Definitely description 1. We do not need fairy tale like descriptions, we need new players to get more information on how to use guns and tanks properly.

[BERKAY44 2]

2

[semyonkirov 29,038]

Isn't number 2 the modified version of the current one in the game?

Exactly. The question is whether players like current descriptions or would like them to be more informative and brief.

[Raphael2 3,263]

I prefer funny description. Shorter and more informative description aren't useful for players playing for more than a week ;)

[hema_prince123 1]

:rolleyes: ده رائع وجميل 2 و1 انا اريد قازف الثلج

[FederalBureauFBI 2,881]

For the descriptions, it's good to be short and informative, but..you can simply check the gun/tank's specs and that way see if it's a long or close range weapon, when to use it, etc. So IMO the current 'funny' descriptions are better.

Edited July 4, 2013 by FederalBureauFBI

[Amagi 1,728]

No. 2 seems more legit.  :)

[freeawesomeness 0]

2

[r_HichigoShiro0 37]

I don't read the description, I only look at the stats 

[thelastremnant 120]

1 is concrete but 2 is descriptive

[r_tinted0 1]

i dont know that freeze can help the fire victims

[r_lukyza0 1]

2