Jump to content
EN
Play

Forum

Let's Discuss Firebird!


 Share

Which playing style do you prefer when playing with Firebird?  

8 members have voted

  1. 1. Which playing style do you prefer when playing with Firebird?

    • Attack
      8
    • Defence
      0
    • Support
      0
    • Parkour
      1
  2. 2. Which Firebird augments do you prefer?

    • Standard
      1
    • High-pressure pump
      1
    • Compact fuel tanks
      1
    • Incendiary mix
      4
    • Adrenaline
      1
    • Paralyzing mix
      1
    • Jamming mix
      3
  3. 3. Which skin for Firebird do you prefer?

    • Standard
      2
    • XT
      5
    • Old Demonic
      0
    • Demonic (HD)
      3


Recommended Posts

thats not right dictator is really good with firebird

Actually i think to buy it but i think catching light tankers can be hard. İt can be good but for crowded matches right?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i'll censor out all the insults I get. It's hard to act like a total noob. Clip size doesn't matter when you use all at once then die right after, like the majority of noob rico users. It's also absurd that I have to be a rico user to criticize ricochet. You don't have to be a master chef to say a meal is terrible.

Edited by Loackie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i'll censor out all the insults I get. It's hard to act like a total noob. Clip size doesn't matter when you use all at once then die right after, like the majority of noob rico users. It's also absurd that I have to be a rico user to criticize ricochet. You don't have to be a master chef to say a meal is terrible.

how do you know a meal is horrible without eating it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Chameleos: seeing other people eat it, smelling it, looking at it. (mainly the first one) If I see plenty of noobs using Ricochet improperly and getting D/Ls over 1, and near top score on their team, why shouldn't I say Ricochet is somewhat overpowered? Thunder got a damage nerf in update 207 b/c people said Thunder was too damaging. (This was WAY before I actually used Thunder) If I occasoinally get hit by a railgun autoaim at 90 degrees, wouldn't I say the autoaim is overpowering? And yes, I have tried using it in battle a few times to see what's so special about it: It's literally everything I expected, and I tried to act like a total noob whilst doing it.

 

- Damage is insane (I either crippled the enemy heavily or killed them easily simply by charging them and sitting on the spacebar)

- you die so often clip size rarely matters

- Ricochet feature is meant to be pratical, and imo it should be rewarded. (I saw some really lucky shots from normal rico noobs who missed me by a mile then it hit me in the back)

 

If you see a friend eat something then he gags it out a few seconds later, and goes to the bathroom, are you going to try to eat that meal for your own pleasure?

Edited by Loackie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

any long range gun i have (smoky,thunder) work better than rico you know why? no clip.

if you keep dying to refresh your clip i have nothing more to say.

by the way,at my ranks,people who are first place are either druggers,isidas,or skilled people. No rico noobs. (:

try using it that way with people one M above you since you say m0 rules m1

i never charge my foes,why lose life so easily with short range people? to reload your clip by dying?  :lol:  ridicolous

if it didnt have a clip damage would be lower anyways. you can't kill a mammoth with a full clip,short range can

okay,i'm done with you,don't expect another answer

Edited by Chameleos

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...