Firebird M2 or Railgun M2

[r_Firingsniper0 1,215]

Im thinking about buying Firebird or Railgun M2, which should I buy? (After buying mamm m2)

[JamesM10 14]

This is a good question, two of my favourite weapons that I can't really pick between...

 

What's your playing style? 

[ExtremeKiller26 443]

He said he is buying mammy M2. so...

[JamesM10 14]

I don't think he means to use with the Mammy, or do you? 

[HeroPlayer 797]

Mammoth + Fire = Like a burning hell for the enemy!

[r_Firingsniper0 1,215]

No I'm playing with Hornet which I will upgrade later.

 

Both Railgun and Firebird suits it.

Edited July 10, 2013 by r_Firingsniper0

[JamesM10 14]

Rail takes more practise to get used to.

 

Firebird is a bit easier to get a grasp on.

 

Personally, I would say railgun. 

[Raphael2 3,263]

This is a good question, two of my favourite weapons that I can't really pick between...

That goes for me too.

 

If you use a fast tank, I'd say get railgun and play large maps such as Kungur.

 

If you have mammy or titan, go play DMs with  Firebird, the M2 version still works with generalissimos.

 

If you have a medium tank, get the one you prefer.

[A_Jl_E_H_T.00 615]

Fire I dont what range weps do u like, as I saw u like mid range weps like Thunder. If u like to hide an shot from far, feel safe etc. bux Railgun but if u like to attack buy Firebird, I played with it on test server and all I can say its very very strong weapon.

[r_Firingsniper0 1,215]

Fire I dont what range weps do u like, as I saw u like mid range weps like Thunder. If u like to hide an shot from far, feel safe etc. bux Railgun but if u like to attack buy Firebird, I played with it on test server and all I can say its very very strong weapon.

I have experience with railgun, and had very good D/L's with it. Though I want to know what firebird is and what it does, and I can be strong in those wasp fire battles :P

[M3Panzer5 1]

Depends on your hull, mammoth is not good with rail but worse with firebird.

Edited July 10, 2013 by M3Panzer5

[yuvalking1223 61]

Get firebird dude !!!

U will beat them badly!!!!!

[KiwiZaphod 53]

I play both - I find Railgun is more fun, but that's me.

[icerugby 1,886]

Rail. Since u can use in large + medium + some small maps. Fire is good but only in medium/small maps

[husto 474]

I think the both weapons cannot be compared, one is used for short distance fight, with a tank that can moove fastly, the other can be used to camp and make a good d/l.

[hogree 4,179]

Firebird M2, by a looooong way.

[michalis2005 1]

think about it rail is a long range weapon and firebird is a short range weapon and you have got mammoth it has got many life ........ but it is slow you can play mammoth with freeze cuz it can slow down the other tanks firebird cannot do that so if the other tank has got dictator hunter hornet and wasp you will lose the kill so play it with hornet or a fast hull i think rail is the best cuz it cannot shoot very fast so with mammoth is good cuz it has got 300 life!!!

[r_Firingsniper0 1,215]

think about it rail is a long range weapon and firebird is a short range weapon and you have got mammoth it has got many life ........ but it is slow you can play mammoth with freeze cuz it can slow down the other tanks firebird cannot do that so if the other tank has got dictator hunter hornet and wasp you will lose the kill so play it with hornet or a fast hull i think rail is the best cuz it cannot shoot very fast so with mammoth is good cuz it has got 300 life!!!

i dont have freeze m1

[Remaine 4,687]

If you're a close-combat sort of person, Firebird is the way to go.

If you're a long-range person, Railgun is what you should be doing.

 

If you're a bit of both (like myself) pick the one you find yourself using more.

[mistriker 8]

I would say railgun because of the numerous amounts of rails at that rank. Firebird makes you an easy target and you probably wont be able to do much damage before you are killed.