Jump to content
EN
Play

Forum

Let's Discuss Viking!


 Share

LET'S DISCUSS VIKING  

12 members have voted

  1. 1. Which gaming style do you prefer when playing with Viking?

    • Attack
      12
    • Defence
      2
    • Support
      1
    • Parkour
      1
  2. 2. Which game modes do you prefer to play in when using Viking?

    • TDM (Team Death Match)
      7
    • CTF (Capture the Flag)
      5
    • CP (Control Points)
      4
    • ASL (Assault)
      2
    • RGB (Rugby)
      2
    • TJR (Team Juggernaut)
      7
    • SGE (Siege)
      3
    • DM (Death Match)
      2
    • SJR (Solo Juggernaut)
      2
  3. 3. Which skin for Viking do you prefer?

    • Standard (HD)
      3
    • XT
      4
    • Legacy
      5
    • Prime
      0
    • Ultra
      4


Recommended Posts

How do you figure that?

 

You see a lot of Vikings because many of us had already invested too much into Viking to make the switch.

 

The weakness becomes so apparent when you have a Ricco trying to fight a twins in Industrial zone.  Could barely get a shot on the twins as it's ridiculous impact kept turning my Viking.  Sad.

 

When I started an alt account, guess which medium hull I have invested in....

It is the most commonly used medium Hull on the M2 Levels 

Cause M1 Viking is way more cheaper than M1 Hunter and it unlocks earlier that is why it is more common and Most Start MU ing it right away

and end up with M2 Viking and start saving for a Hunter m3 Kit {  :rolleyes:  , Looks like my story xd}

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is the most commonly used medium Hull on the M2 Levels 

Cause M1 Viking is way more cheaper than M1 Hunter and it unlocks earlier that is why it is more common and Most Start MU ing it right away

and end up with M2 Viking and start saving for a Hunter m3 Kit {  :rolleyes:  , Looks like my story xd}

If they were smart - they would just MU Hunter m0.  Gives you Hunter m1 early and that is better than Viking m1.

 

And even though Viking m1 unlocks earlier, Hunter m0 10/10 competes well until Hunter m1 unlocks.

 

I'm not seeing the disparity of Viking over Hunter in mid-ranks like there was 2 yrs ago.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If they were smart - they would just MU Hunter m0.  Gives you Hunter m1 early and that is better than Viking m1.

 

And even though Viking m1 unlocks earlier, Hunter m0 10/10 competes well until Hunter m1 unlocks.

 

I'm not seeing the disparity of Viking over Hunter in mid-ranks like there was 2 yrs ago.

Hmm

Yes , and if they were Smart , which they aren't 

Also Viking looks better than Hunter 

 

That is true 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Really? I though hunter was too fast and unstable. I could be wrong

That was the old stats

After the re-balance. Hunter is faster and more stable than viking 

 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That was the old stats

After the re-balance. Hunter is faster and more stable than viking

 

Well it's not really faster than Viking. But you wouldn't be wrong if you said that hunter is better than viking nowadays.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Viking is one of those things that I equip almost all the time because I am used to it, same with railgun. I will get hunter on the next sale but it would have to be perfect to make me switch.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Viking is clearly outclassed by Hunter and Dictator, I used to think it's low weight and power didn't matter but now I realized they completely changed the gameplay experience with it.... easily drifts like Hornet, and has it's aim knocked off like Wasp. 

 

 

To call it medium is a crime, it should have it's HP reduced and join Hornet and Wasp as the 3rd light hull !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Viking is clearly outclassed by Hunter and Dictator, I used to think it's low weight and power didn't matter but now I realized they completely changed the gameplay experience with it.... easily drifts like Hornet, and has it's aim knocked off like Wasp. 

 

 

To call it medium is a crime, it should have it's HP reduced and join Hornet and Wasp as the 3rd light hull !

why bro

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To call it medium is a crime, it should have it's HP reduced and join Hornet and Wasp as the 3rd light hull !

It has more speed though, 0,5 m/s more than Hunter and 1,0 m/s more than Shoe.

The choice for short range weapons, the fact that we've 9,5 m/s on a medium hull is ridiculous.

 

On the other hand, it's low profile makes it unsuitable for long range weapons, and the stability is extremely bad.

I bought this thing because it once was the most stable hull and boom they switched the stats between Hunter and Viking.

 

I got Hunter now, it's mu'd 7/20, my preference of long range turrets forced me into buying this thing; I'll get it out on the field when it reaches M4.

Firebird on Viking is so overpowered lol.. you zoom around the map with 3000 freaking HP, touch 'm for a second and they're either dead or severely crippled.  

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

why bro

Cause of all the experiences I've had with this thing. At M3 it slides around so much that I wouldn't hesitate to call it Hornet 2.0 

 

It has more speed though, 0,5 m/s more than Hunter and 1,0 m/s more than Shoe.

The choice for short range weapons, the fact that we've 9,5 m/s on a medium hull is ridiculous.

 

On the other hand, it's low profile makes it unsuitable for long range weapons, and the stability is extremely bad.

I bought this thing because it once was the most stable hull and boom they switched the stats between Hunter and Viking.

 

I got Hunter now, it's mu'd 7/20, my preference of long range turrets forced me into buying this thing; I'll get it out on the field when it reaches M4.

Firebird on Viking is so overpowered lol.. you zoom around the map with 3000 freaking HP, touch 'm for a second and they're either dead or severely crippled.  

Exactly, this extra speed is completely unwanted unless you're using short range turrets, not any other weapon needs it. Might as well trade off that speed with some more weight, like what Viking used to be years ago, I loved that Viking.

Why do medium hulls need to be that different compared to each other anyways? I guess so each hull has a unique purpose and gameplay experience.. But still they should've made the difference small, and not as large as this!

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cause of all the experiences I've had with this thing. At M3 it slides around so much that I wouldn't hesitate to call it Hornet 2.0 

 

Exactly, this extra speed is completely unwanted unless you're using short range turrets, not any other weapon needs it. Might as well trade off that speed with some more weight, like what Viking used to be years ago, I loved that Viking.

Why do medium hulls need to be that different compared to each other anyways? I guess so each hull has a unique purpose and gameplay experience.. But still they should've made the difference small, and not as large as this!

Its the hunter not the viking. Hunter is too quick. I've played it with full micro upgrades and i literally fly around the map. :P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It has more speed though, 0,5 m/s more than Hunter and 1,0 m/s more than Shoe.

The choice for short range weapons, the fact that we've 9,5 m/s on a medium hull is ridiculous.

 

On the other hand, it's low profile makes it unsuitable for long range weapons, and the stability is extremely bad.

I bought this thing because it once was the most stable hull and boom they switched the stats between Hunter and Viking.

 

I got Hunter now, it's mu'd 7/20, my preference of long range turrets forced me into buying this thing; I'll get it out on the field when it reaches M4.

Firebird on Viking is so overpowered lol.. you zoom around the map with 3000 freaking HP, touch 'm for a second and they're either dead or severely crippled.

 

  

Firebird is overpowered on any hull, not just on Viking. Of course, it's probably the only turret that is even useful on Viking.

 

If you knock off a freeze, it'll take that much longer for it to refreeze you and kill you, also similar with isida and twins.

 

If you knock off a firebird, you better hope you did in time before they have the burn set on you, other wise you're practically done because the burn produces constant damage.

 

 

Its the hunter not the viking. Hunter is too quick. I've played it with full micro upgrades and i literally fly around the map. :P

When I was still using Viking on my main, I noticed that many hunters can catch up to me without much trouble.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  

Firebird is overpowered on any hull, not just on Viking. Of course, it's probably the only turret that is even useful on Viking.

 

If you knock off a freeze, it'll take that much longer for it to refreeze you and kill you, also similar with isida and twins.

 

If you knock off a firebird, you better hope you did in time before they have the burn set on you, other wise you're practically done because the burn produces constant damage.

 

 

 

When I was still using Viking on my main, I noticed that many hunters can catch up to me without much trouble.

Firebird should be rebalanced. It just does way too much damage at m4

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its the hunter not the viking. Hunter is too quick. I've played it with full micro upgrades and i literally fly around the map. :P

Hunter used to be the fastest medium hull, but now Viking is the fastest, and lightest, and has the least power of them.

 

The problem is that the speed advantage it has over Hunter and Dictator is not sufficient to justify it's horrible stability compared to them.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With all the Firebirds running around in battles now I am appreciating Viking's speed more than ever. I think it makes up for the instability.

Yes - for Isida, Firebird and Freeze, Viking is probably more effective than Hunter.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With all the Firebirds running around in battles now I am appreciating Viking's speed more than ever. I think it makes up for the instability.

Firebird is literally the only turret that's useful on Viking. Firebird is that much overpowered.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Firebird is literally the only turret that's useful on Viking. Firebird is that much overpowered.

This is 100% correct.  Except for the part about literally.  And the part about only.  Other than that...

 

Isida is fine with Viking - speed allows it to close distance with enemy or team-mates, and Freeze is similar to firebird.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...