Jump to content
EN
Play

Forum

Let's Discuss Hunter!


 Share

WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT HUNTER?   

15 members have voted

  1. 1. Which gaming style do you prefer when playing with Hunter?

    • Attack
      12
    • Defence
      4
    • Support
      6
    • Parkour
      2
  2. 2. Which game modes do you prefer to play in when using Hunter?

    • TDM (Team Death Match)
      7
    • CTF (Capture the Flag)
      11
    • CP (Control Points)
      5
    • ASL (Assault)
      6
    • RGB (Rugby)
      2
    • TJR (Team Juggernaut)
      5
    • SGE (Siege)
      3
    • DM (Death Match)
      3
    • SJR (Solo Juggernaut)
      1
  3. 3. Which skin for Hunter do you prefer?

    • Standard (HD)
      5
    • XT
      4
    • Prime
      4
    • Ultra
      5
    • Legacy
      2


Recommended Posts

Yes i just came from a battle in iran, i was watching all the hulls in action

Strangely Hunter wasn't that fast, barely could chase with viking ! despite its speed is supposed to be 9.5 Vs 7.8 Viking

something confusing is going on with this game

I started to wonder why should i waste crystals on hunter while i can MU either hornet, wasp, titan or viking :/

I hardly ever seen hunter around in maps like polygon, farm, desert, silence  etc I mean I do see them but it`s very rare to mostly I see Viking.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I hardly ever seen hunter around in maps like polygon, farm, desert, silence  etc I mean I do see them but it`s very rare to mostly I see Viking.

the m3 version is cool,i am going to get hunter m3 at my high account :wub:

will be my first m3 hull :D

and i dont know why hunter barely can be seen in battlefield :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the m3 version is cool,i am going to get hunter m3 at my high account :wub:

will be my first m3 hull :D

and i dont know why hunter barely can be seen in battlefield :(

I am going to a lot to battles these days hunting for hunters m3, trying to see their game plays, they are best played with freeze or rail, previously some players were using shaft and thunder with it, these days most players are going with viking or hornet, half generalissimos are still stuck with the turtle mammoth.

It never happened to see hunter in sandbox, just in battles like iran, polygon.  

But again, why the different stat doesn't show much difference in speed in real play when compared to viking!

For god's sake it was moving too slow, as if at speed of 7 ! and am trying to upgrade my test server account and still the codes are not working

If anybody will find a video of hunter m3 after the new physics "In action" then please post it in here. Thanks

Edited by dardayy
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the m3 version is cool,i am going to get hunter m3 at my high account :wub:

will be my first m3 hull :D

and i dont know why hunter barely can be seen in battlefield :(

it seems good to me when I see it in battle but Viking seems to be more popular & I`m still trying to decide on which to  get ? :wacko:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

it seems good to me when I see it in battle but Viking seems to be more popular & I`m still trying to decide on which to  get ? :wacko:

of course,you should get viking m3 :D (is unlocked at the next rank)

my high account is marshall and soon will be field marshall(when hunter m3 unlocks)

and would be a shame if i dont take hunter m3 :wub:

so,is quite logic that i must take hunter m3 :D  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Better the Hunter than the Dictator in my humble opinion. Certainly the Hunter M3.

 

My highest rank ( so it is not so high) is WO5 and till now I never met a Dictator-tankist who impressed me. It might be that it is a great tank in the right

skillfull hands and presumably at higher Ranks, but untill now I consider it a rather Big, moving, clumsy and unstable Target.

I am a lot more afraid of a skillfull Wasp-tankist!

 

But untill M3 I strongly believe in the more common Hornets and Vikings. Personally I prefer the Viking (especially at DM 's), because you can play in a more "agressive" style. Hiding and taking cover is still very important, but you can stand your ground in the "open" too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know: you really like it? The Stats are incredible, but the tank is big and very unstable. You might "fix" that unstability with your skills, but still....

I've been good at balancing my wasp so dictator hopefully won't feel like nothing at all. It will be cool that I'm able to join battles and get isida on my dictator or freeze and I'll be unstoppable

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you already try the Dictator at a lower rank or are you going to take a Huge ( like the Tank itself :P ) gamble?

 

There is truth in your comparison between Wasp and Dictator, your experience ith the Wasp will be most welcome!

If you shoot at a Dictator with a Rico you can actually make it spin a quarter of a circle. Not more because it is already "dead" by than....too bad it is nice "dancing"! :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just came back from my 3rd checking on hunter m3

I kept watching players in Iran and in Silence

Viking was much better !

Even when i made some chase with them, their acceleration was too slow until they could pass me

I really wished to get a video, because what i saw was very strange, its supposed to be fast with a speed near to 9.5 compared to viking, but the 2 difference in speed doesn't show much difference in real game play

The only good thing is its small size, that makes from it an easy to maneuver tank, thats all.

 

The second good thing is that you can run away "with difficulty" from a viking with isida or freeze

 

Its weird that the game made the cheapest and low ranks tanks to be the best tanks like hornet and viking

Edited by dardayy
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just came back from my 3rd checking on hunter m3

I kept watching players in Iran and in Silence

Viking was much better !

Even when i made some chase with them, their acceleration was too slow until they could pass me

I really wished to get a video, because what i saw was very strange, its supposed to be fast with a speed near to 9.5 compared to viking, but the 2 difference in speed doesn't show much difference in real game play

The only good thing is its small size, that makes from it an easy to maneuver tank, thats all.

 

The second good thing is that you can run away "with difficulty" from a viking with isida or freeze

 

Its weird that the game made the cheapest and low ranks tanks to be the best tanks like hornet and viking

i am still getting hunter :D

i will not change my mind ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What Adam saying is truly correct. Hornet shouldn't be too good because it's cheap and too common. And Viking is too cheap as well compared to other tanks at its rank and their price.

 

It's nt very fair

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just came back from my 3rd checking on hunter m3

I kept watching players in Iran and in Silence

Viking was much better !

Even when i made some chase with them, their acceleration was too slow until they could pass me

I really wished to get a video, because what i saw was very strange, its supposed to be fast with a speed near to 9.5 compared to viking, but the 2 difference in speed doesn't show much difference in real game play

The only good thing is its small size, that makes from it an easy to maneuver tank, thats all.

 

The second good thing is that you can run away "with difficulty" from a viking with isida or freeze

 

Its weird that the game made the cheapest and low ranks tanks to be the best tanks like hornet and viking

Good warning Adam, thanks! Never really checked on accelleration, did not thought it would be so important. I just checked TO Wiki and the numbers are clear:

 

The Hornet acceleration M0 to M3: :mellow:

8.6    10.12    10.96   12.14

 

The Viking accelleration M0 to M3: :wub:

9.5    10.97    13.06    13.9

 

The Hunter accelleration M0 to M3: :huh:

7.2     8.27      8.68     9.42

 

Wow, a "sprinting" Hunter is pretty bad! It is like Usain Bolt having to sprint the first 10 meters on sand and the other 90 meters on the track....

 

And look at the Viking: the numbers are even better than the Hornet!

 

Well I thought the Hunter M3 would be a certain buy. It seems I can save myself a lot of crystals in the future! :)

 

Especially in my favorite Polygon DM, you need the short quick sprints, the Hunter doesn't cut it!

 

So it seems that the M2 hull-kit I bought only has two tanks I like: The Hornet and The Viking.

The Mammoth was already NP- junk (proposal for a new name for the "Mammoth": the "Dombo") and the Hunter M2 is junk as well, because it seems non-upgrade worthy material.....the Hunter simply wears too heavy boots.....

 

I am going Berserk! :  playing Horny Viking all the way!  :D

Edited by Smok-Ti-Thun
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What Adam saying is truly correct. Hornet shouldn't be too good because it's cheap and too common. And Viking is too cheap as well compared to other tanks at its rank and their price.

 

It's nt very fair

It isn't fair...but I can live with that :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i am still getting hunter :P (m3 at my high account)

i will stay steady like a mountain :D

i will take hunter and nobody will gonna change that :lol:

haters <_<  

If you want to stay steady like a mountain I really advice you to buy the Mammoth. I have even seen faster mountains! :) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the acceleration report dear Smok-Ti-Thun

 

i deleted my comment because i think am still not sure,

 

Why hunter m2 is still good with acceleration

 

anyway there is some glitch with me it seems (:

Edited by dardayy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the acceleration report dear Smok-Ti-Thun

 

Yes this is what i tested, because i count more on real game play than stats, and if you were having a freeze with viking, then they can hunt the hunter because of its slow acceleration that make it for hunter so difficult to escape, it may survive just if it keeps moving.

 

Also we made tests on speed between viking and hunter, they start running together until 3 seconds theeen hunter will start passing the viking slowly.

 

No more hunter for me , right now i will go with the fast hulls MUs instead of wasting crystals on buying something useless, in addition to my viking and titan MUs

 

But the problem is the game physics keep changing and they may fix hunter in the future for its price and rank.

 

The current stats are very deceiving but when you go to many battles observing then it gives you a great idea, and am pretty sure now that hunter isn't good for most maps.

i still go for hunter m3 :D

ah,its aspect and beauty :wub: 

with the inferno paint :wub: 

my heart makes ka-boom :D  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...