Let's Discuss Hunter!

[dardayy 493]

So they reduced the number of MUs needed to reach max speed but didn't reimburse players for "wasted" MUs? That is how you ruin a game economy -_-

they kept the same number of steps, but every step turned useless and addint too little to the speed, because the default speed is already boosted, lets say if the speed was 9.5 .. then whats the use of spending 300k crystals to get it up to 10? if i knew this from the start i was to MU only first few steps.. 

[fluctuation123 3,435]

as i said above things can get unreal with hunter rico combo. for example your d/l in an all gismo match :D

 

a match with a few double damage and nothing else...

 

[thunderousrailgunner 1,934]

I Respect the Shaft in le Pic ^^  :mellow:

[fluctuation123 3,435]

shaft?

[thunderousrailgunner 1,934]

Oh Maybe Firebird , it looked like shaft to my eyes  :blink:

[trombone_ftw 734]

It may be more worth it to buy M2-M3 Viking during the wait for M3 Hunter, rather than to MU M2 Hunter

[Chameleos 157]

It may be more worth it to buy M2-M3 Viking during the wait for M3 Hunter, rather than to MU M2 Hunter

Why not Wasp M3? It's a great hull.

[trombone_ftw 734]

Why not Wasp M3? It's a great hull.

That's true but it's not a medium hull. M3 Wasp will be my next purchase btw .-.

[Chameleos 157]

That's true but it's not a medium hull. M3 Wasp will be my next purchase btw .-.

Why use 2 medium hulls?

[Loackie 269]

People, get this combo.

[pic]

here is why:

 [pic #2]

and i idid it with only 2 mus on damage of rico. rico hunter combo is so good and so smooth, i cannot praise it enough :D

I wish I was still good with FireWasp so i could get my M2 FireWasp, join that battle, and get the same result.

Edited July 9, 2015 by Loackie

[LeIouch_Vi_Britannia 6,163]

I wish I was still good with FireWasp so i could get my M2 FireWasp, join that battle, and get the same result.

I missed u k .-.

[trombone_ftw 734]

Why use 2 medium hulls?

Because M2 Hunter must last you till Field Marshal, which it can't do unless you MU it. I thought it might be easier and better to just buy M2 Viking and M3 Viking (or maybe a M3 Viking kit and skip the M2) so you have a nice strong medium hull up until Field Marshal when you can get the Hunter M3.

[Lord-of-the-Snipers 1,620]

Why use 2 medium hulls?

Good question

 

Because M2 Hunter must last you till Field Marshal, which it can't do unless you MU it. I thought it might be easier and better to just buy M2 Viking and M3 Viking (or maybe a M3 Viking kit and skip the M2) so you have a nice strong medium hull up until Field Marshal when you can get the Hunter M3.

Viking 's M3 fully micro-upgraded speed is 9.0 and protection is 315.

It has more armour, but it is slower in top- and turning-speed.

 

Hunter 's M2 fully micro-upgraded speed is 9.5! and protection is 248.

Seems like a very decent hull to me!

315 - 248 = 67 HP less armour: substantial, but not an earth-shaking difference either.

 

I would personally go for the one-hull solution: Hunter M2 with micro-upgrades,

rather than having a second medium hull like the Viking M3 without,

or with just a few micro-upgrades.

 

It 's effective IMO to invest the crystals you save, when you focus on one hull only,

in micro-upgrading that one hull. (not on M1 hulls, but from M2 it can be worth it: especially

with very late M3 upgrading equipment like a Hunter M3)

And if you manage to upgrade a parameter like protection fully on a M2 Hunter, you do get

a pretty decent discount on M3 Hunter.

 

And a decent micro-upgraded Hunter M2 is 100% capable enough to get you to

the next M3 upgrade. It should be.

Just be sure to take full advantage of the MU-discounts!

[trombone_ftw 734]

Good question

 

Viking 's M3 fully micro-upgraded speed is 9.0 and protection is 315.

It has more armour, but it is slower in top- and turning-speed.

 

Hunter 's M2 fully micro-upgraded speed is 9.5! and protection is 248.

Seems like a very decent hull to me!

315 - 248 = 67 HP less armour: substantial, but not an earth-shaking difference either.

 

I would personally go for the one-hull solution: Hunter M2 with micro-upgrades,

rather than having a second medium hull like the Viking M3 without,

or with just a few micro-upgrades.

 

It 's effective IMO to invest the crystals you save, when you focus on one hull only,

in micro-upgrading that one hull. (not on M1 hulls, but from M2 it can be worth it: especially

with very late M3 upgrading equipment like a Hunter M3)

And if you manage to upgrade a parameter like protection fully on a M2 Hunter, you do get

a pretty decent discount on M3 Hunter.

 

And a decent micro-upgraded Hunter M2 is 100% capable enough to get you to

the next M3 upgrade. It should be.

Just be sure to take full advantage of the MU-discounts!

I totally forgot about the discount at the end... silly me! With just a few more MUs M3 Hunter will be about half price for me!

[greyat 2,972]

Because M2 Hunter must last you till Field Marshal, which it can't do unless you MU it. I thought it might be easier and better to just buy M2 Viking and M3 Viking (or maybe a M3 Viking kit and skip the M2) so you have a nice strong medium hull up until Field Marshal when you can get the Hunter M3.

Alternately, you can buy M2 Dictator, which has insane HP MUs.

[LeIouch_Vi_Britannia 6,163]

Alternately, you can buy M2 Dictator, which has insane HP MUs.

The only good I see in dictator is taking golds, which I rather do that with skills and my hunter

than the buggy Dicy...

---

This combo is actually nice :D

[Lord-of-the-Snipers 1,620]

The only good I see in dictator is taking golds, which I rather do that with skills and my hunter

than the buggy Dicy...

---

This combo is actually nice :D

Vulcan??? Ok, nobody 's perfect... :D

[LeIouch_Vi_Britannia 6,163]

Vulcan??? Ok, nobody 's perfect... :D

wut? didnt get u there .-.

[greyat 2,972]

The only good I see in dictator is taking golds, which I rather do that with skills and my hunter

than the buggy Dicy...

---

This combo is actually nice :D

Eh... a M2 hull with the potential to have over 300 HP... you don't admire that?

[Lord-of-the-Snipers 1,620]

wut? didnt get u there .-.

I really don 't like Vulcan. That 's all.

Edited July 10, 2015 by Lord-of-the-Snipers

[LeIouch_Vi_Britannia 6,163]

I really don 't like Vulcan. That 's all.

 

Read this post on the previous page: http://en.tankiforum.com/index.php?showtopic=177254&page=132&do=findComment&comment=4804746

 

Than ask again (maybe...) if i don 't admire M2 Hunter.

Im just trying it out :P

 

Eh... a M2 hull with the potential to have over 300 HP... you don't admire that?

 

My Mammy has over 300 hp already :/ :p

Edited July 10, 2015 by LeIouch_Vi_Britannia

[tankionline2027 778]

Hunter m1:

 

I've bought it today in the this kit:

 

And you know what? Its actually amazing, Vulcan is not that bad but not the best never the less I'd prefer Smoky on it. Hunter is a decent M1 perhaps the best M1 hull in my opinion. The funny part is that I don't really need any drugs to rock, it already rocks.

 

Hunter m1: 10/10 :)

[LeIouch_Vi_Britannia 6,163]

 

Hunter m1:

 

I've bought it today in the this kit:

 

And you know what? Its actually amazing, Vulcan is not that bad but not the best never the less I'd prefer Smoky on it. Hunter is a decent M1 perhaps the best M1 hull in my opinion. The funny part is that I don't really need any drugs to rock, it already rocks.

 

Hunter m1: 10/10 :)

I bought the kit on my alt too ant its already rocking :p

+ that vulcan is a nice 1 too

[Supernatural 2,053]

Hunter m3 is better than viking m3 but it's available at higher rank, more expensive and Hunter is ugly for me. I recommend buying the Redneck kit for those who don't have Viking m3. That's all i could say :D

Edited July 12, 2015 by Supernatural

[dardayy 493]

Its more easy to control Hunter m1 and m2 than its m3 ! 

 

why is that ? a kind of a deception in senses i have ? :S