Let's Discuss Hunter!

[Thomas11239 366]

I find hunter m1 great... but m2 is bad i think

[Buggati_The_Best 1,233]

no,also m2 is good

[USA-POWER 227]

i wouldnt,because your viking m3 is fully MU o.O

better take a heavy m3 ;)

I can't believe UUUUU .. UUU ! say this

[Buggati_The_Best 1,233]

omg,dont get me wrong,i love hunter

i say that you already have a full MU viking m3 and to get hunter m3 and after MU this hull to the max while you already have viking full MU is kinda odd..

Better go for dictator m3 xD

[Buggati_The_Best 1,233]

i know you buyer,if you want to buy hunter and after MU it to full,is your bussiness,ok?

[USA-POWER 227]

i know you buyer,if you want to buy hunter and after MU it to full,is your bussiness,ok?

i am left with only 560 k crystals.. i will buy clay + firebird or freeze + Hunter "May be"

I like how it drives .. unfortunately test server is closed

[Vettefan22 145]

^ ONLY?  I currently have 25k, and a lot of that is from just ranking...

[eefschiet 17]

I'm mostly an mid-fielder, a little bit defending and a little bit attacking. Is hunter m2 the right choise?

I'm almost always using thunder, in larger battles I use my shaft

Edited June 2, 2014 by eefschiet

[USA-POWER 227]

I'm mostly an mid-fielder, a little bit defending and a little bit attacking. Is hunter m2 the right choise?

I'm almost always using thunder, in larger battles I use my shaft

nobody can solve this puzzle .. and non did it the right way until now .. this topic of which one is better viking or hunter got complicated :D

If u play with no MUs in clan tournemants then hunter is better.. but in usual battles viking is much stronger

However it counts on what you want as well

hunter provides you better weight than viking, thus more aiming with rail and shaft after they hit u with smoky

Also its so easy to handle .. while viking is rectangular in shape and its corners are sharp , making it difficult in doing maneuvers

[Wewum34 0]

I'm getting m1 on the sale a couple days from today :D

[Buggati_The_Best 1,233]

in my opinion,hunter m3 always better than viking m3 :D

extra speed better than extra health..

[Vettefan22 145]

^ Agreed.

[USA-POWER 227]

in my opinion,hunter m3 always better than viking m3 :D

extra speed better than extra health..

DIsagree

For mammoth vs titan there is a 20 hp difference  and 1 difference in speed.. which one is better? ---> Titan

Becuase its not related to how much difference only .. its related to the hp / speed ratio as well

Viking with a 25 hp more armor than hunter and only 1 speed difference is highly significant than a 20 hp difference in btw titan and mammoth

 

Thus Viking is faraway better... The only good thing with hunter is its use in no MUs battles

 

Was talking about Full Mus

And tests and observations from a lot of battles

Edited June 3, 2014 by USA-POWER

[doughnut2100 763]

Sure :)

 

We need more though :3

ME! M2 hunter in 2 days. :o

[doughnut2100 763]

I find hunter m1 great... but m2 is bad i think

What a horrible assumption.

[USA-POWER 227]

What a horrible assumption.

I think he meant for that upgrade level related ranks

Yes hunter m1 is good, but once u rank up and u will need to go either with hunter m2 or viking.. then viking is faraway better than hunter m2.. because the hp of hunter m2 can get just a little bit higher with the MUs

Edited June 3, 2014 by USA-POWER

[Thekillerpenguin 1,731]

 

Thus Viking is faraway better... The only good thing with hunter is its use in no MUs battles

 

Hunter has better vanilla stats than Viking from M1 onwards, so it's a lot better right out of the box. Even ignoring the (inconsequential at higher ranks) 25 health advantage, Hunter is faster, more stable, and easier to handle.

 

I'd say Hunter wins in the long run, since the only thing Viking has above it is a little health. If you want more health than Hunter, use Dictator, since you at least get a more noticeable health advantage.

[Buggati_The_Best 1,233]

hunter better than viking,so shut up :D

[USA-POWER 227]

deleted .. useless ^ comments ..

apart from buggati .. i always like his comments :D

Edited June 4, 2014 by USA-POWER

[USA-POWER 227]

You could simply cost yourself a little and read the previous pages' discussions since u r new to our page .

Edited June 4, 2014 by USA-POWER

[USA-POWER 227]

deleted .. useless ^^ comments ..

apart from buggati .. i always like his comments :D

[doughnut2100 763]

I think he meant for that upgrade level related ranks

Yes hunter m1 is good, but once u rank up and u will need to go either with hunter m2 or viking.. then viking is faraway better than hunter m2.. because the hp of hunter m2 can get just a little bit higher with the MUs

Your assumption is not any better. He probably did not mean that, he said "I think" after it and did not talk about upgrade levels, it was as bad as it got. Once you rank up hunter and viking are not the choices, you can get any tank you would like. Hunter is better to me, you say viking is much better as if it is a fact. That is your opinion, okay. Make sure it sounds as what it should be.

[doughnut2100 763]

I got Hunter m2! It's amazing as I thought it would be. :)

[LiquidSoup 9]

Yea I was looking at its stats and it looks pretty awesome :o

[Vettefan22 145]

^ M1 stats are the best