Let's Discuss Hunter!

[USA-POWER 227]

Disappointed .. at its fully MUed speed no much difference from 9.5 speed .. and viking is still having faster acceleration , and viking is still having the advantage in many battles because of its flat wide surface area which prevents viking from flipping when getting shot or when maneuvering at different heights .. also viking is more easy to hide unlike the high head of hunter that gives it a round shape appearance.. i wish if they can make its speed up to 10.5 

Edited May 9, 2015 by USA-POWER

[USA-POWER 227]

DEVELOPERS !!!

 

HUNTER NEEDS TO BE SAVED !! Its acceleration Sucks ! i fully MUed its speed and armor.. still its not that good ! its heading toward extinction !

This fancy car shouldn't be dealt with like this !

[Chameleos 157]

Acceleration is given by MUing the power stat, not the speed.

[USA-POWER 227]

Acceleration is given by MUing the power stat, not the speed.

Even though , but its too slow default acceleration and what you can add is very little.. 

[trombone_ftw 734]

Am I the only one who hardly notices Hunter's apparently bad acceleration?

[USA-POWER 227]

Am I the only one who hardly notices Hunter's apparently bad acceleration?

yes it has very bad acceleration .. but once it goes on moving then its good, and once you try to do maneuvers then it sucks 

[USA-POWER 227]

I think they didn't change the stats yet .. because the current stats i guess are different from what is mentioned within each hull's page

 

Acceleration of different Hulls 
Mammoth = 11,000 / reverse acceleration 10,000
Titan = 16,000 / reverse acceleration 17,000 
Dictator = 15,000 / reverse acceleration 19,000
Viking = 17,000 / reverse acceleration 20,000
Hunter = 13,000 / reverse acceleration 18,000 
Wasp = 12,000 / reverse acceleration 17,000 !!
Hornet = 14,000 / reverse acceleration 23,000 !!

it seems they didn't change some of the stats, as wasp is supposed to have now better acceleration .. i d k

 

 

by the way they give faster back acceleration to enable hulls to bounce so that to shoot up and down .. except with mammoth it can't do what other hulls can ..

Edited May 11, 2015 by USA-POWER

[WhirlwindWarrior 2]

Probably The most balanced hull! Defiantly my favourite hull!

[WhirlwindWarrior 2]

Gonna get this hull M3 for sure during Tanki sale. Not sure if I should go for Smoky or not though.... :-/

Try it with railgun or Shaft, anything with a long range weapon not for camping for too long

[USA-POWER 227]

Probably The most balanced hull! Defiantly my favourite hull!

i doubt that you have the enough experience to express what you think without giving reasons 

[LeIouch_Vi_Britannia 6,163]

i doubt that you have the enough experience to express what you think without giving reasons 

+

[falcosenna1 8,320]

Is it worth upgrading Hunter's speed to m4 if you already have its health m4 and viking m4? (Same question for hornet.)  :)

[LeIouch_Vi_Britannia 6,163]

Is it worth upgrading Hunter's speed to m4 if you already have its health m4 and viking m4? (Same question for hornet.)  :)

I shall direct you to @Alklines :D

[USA-POWER 227]

Is it worth upgrading Hunter's speed to m4 if you already have its health m4 and viking m4? (Same question for hornet.)  :)

I saw today a fully Mued hornet in its speed and acceleration .. in order to get a good hunter, then you must MU its power as well this will give it a boost in acceleration, only at that time you will feel the speed .

[justin_the_prosurfer 1,116]

good hull , just when they because's it your 1st free tank , no one really likes it :(

[manofbelgium 18]

I have it M2 now, with thunder M2, and I think it is a really good combo. I'm lieutenant colonel now and it is really nice. It's still as good as it was when I bought it.

[Moonliner 7]

Hunter M1 i really good i recomend it good for attaking and defending on almost al maps

[Leekh_A.forever 83]

Hunter M1 i really good i recomend it good for attaking and defending on almost al maps

Agree though. It is a Great Hull for that the speed is high and the Armour is sufficient. Definitely a great hull for CTF . 

[dfoofnik 341]

Did I miss something? My fully-MUed Viking is too slow to jump at Monte Carlo, but Hunter is now both faster *and* stronger???

Somebody made some tweaks here that does not follow the logical progression "larger, slower tanks have more armor" v/v Hunter and Viking.

It looks like I could take an M3 Hunter up to near-Hornet speed and greater armor than Viking???

The Wiki stats are all outdated, so someone should update what the garage is pointing to...

[sackpilot 9]

Hmmm, viking used to be able to jump at Monte, I think the nerfed the speed.

 

Hunter is still too weak at M2, so at my level I use viking, but at M3 hunter certainly seems the better choice. I've got all that to look forward to... -_-

[kayitsiz 621]

Hmmm, viking used to be able to jump at Monte, I think the nerfed the speed.

 

Hunter is still too weak at M2, so at my level I use viking, but at M3 hunter certainly seems the better choice. I've got all that to look forward to... -_-

It is heavier  ;)

[Buggati_The_Best 1,233]

hunter much better than viking,i still not know why hunter not popular decision for generalismo....

[NewbieCake 3,067]

M2 is beginning to become bad.

[USA-POWER 227]

I feel that hunter m1 and m2 are much more easy to handle than hunter m3 and much more fun .. don't know why 

and they look really more speedy when compared to the rest of tanks with a descent hp .. but with hunter m3 it seems as if too much heavy to drive ..

Edited May 14, 2015 by USA-POWER

[NewbieCake 3,067]

Looks like I'll get Hunter M3 on Tank Man's day :P