Let's Discuss Supplies!

[wolverine848 13,097]

You do nothing but discussing about typos and omissions, avoiding the point of posts. In three words: trolling level one

Wrong again. As usual.  The other poster discussed "typos". I replied.  Is it that hard for you to figure out?

 

Oh - and I'm still waiting for a response in your "7 Reasons..." thread.

[wolverine848 13,097]

If you took those blinkers off you would see that there is plenty of battles available to every type of player  B)

 

You're just too lazy to look and would rather whine on the forum instead  :D

Nope.  I look.  I see a limited amount of battles and join the ones closest to my needs.

 

But to claim everyone can always find the battles they need is just false.

The server loads change drastically over the day.

To deny that is just foolish.

[r_I_already_won0 2,339]

I would actually go and get screenshots of every available battle in every server for you but you would have an excuse like its 12 seconds past your bedtime or something :P  

We non-druggers LIKE playing with druggers. Yeah, that's right. Thank you for your explanation. Helps me see things in a much more clear and logical way.  Yes. Non-druggers LIKE playing against druggers. Makes perfect sense.

Edited December 21, 2016 by r_I_already_won0

[wolverine848 13,097]

I would actually go and get screenshots of every available battle in every server for you but you would have an excuse like its 12 seconds past your bedtime or something :P  

Not sure you understand the definition of "excuse".  But hey, keep up the good work.  ;)

[Lankero 595]

 

 

 

 

 

We non-druggers LIKE playing with druggers. Yeah, that's right. Thank you for your explanation. Helps me see things in a much more clear and logical way.  Yes. Non-druggers LIKE playing against druggers.

:lol: :lol: :lol:

[r_I_already_won0 2,339]

http://en.tankiforum.com/index.php?showtopic=246957&p=5928840

[Strikechard123 241]

Druggers destroy the game for F2P users.

[wolverine848 13,097]

But free-users don't pay anyway

Does not make Strikechard's point invalid.

[wolverine848 13,097]

Free-users have to be battered so that they feel tempted to spend money. Why paying if you can easily enjoy the game for free?

 

I read "Druggers destroy the game for F2P users" but I understand "free-users can't enjoy the game so give them as much power as buyers". Doesn't consider paying, doesn't matter.

Or... maybe you "read it" wrong...

[lolo-gami-ng-youtube 1]

now i always see pepole say noob drugger but why? its part of the game

pepole must think its cheating right?
 

Edited December 31, 2016 by lolo-gami-ng-youtube

[Benefactor 6,888]

When you hear that, then you must be doing something right in playing the game as it was meant to be - utilizing all open resources at your disposal. I mean, it's not a PRO battle, is it?

[Epic_Space_Mango18 592]

It's fine I just hate it when i see the green wrench appear over the tank im attacking :/

[ToiletPaperRoll 1,318]

It's fine I just hate it when i see the green wrench appear over the tank im attacking :/

i like when i see number larger than 3000 above third button so i dont care

[lolo-gami-ng-youtube 1]

yeah

[CooperO 7,956]

now i always see pepole say noob drugger but why? its part of the game

pepole must think its cheating right?

 

Topic merged.

[LittleWillie 3,199]

now i always see pepole say noob drugger but why? its part of the game

pepole must think its cheating right?

 

Was playing a DM game yesterday with a guy who kept a running commentart on who was using 'too many' drugs. Then someone joins and asks the scolding talkative one to team up. "Sure" says the scolder. Then another person whats to join theit team. "OK" ...

 

So here we have a giy that would not shut up about something that is part of the game and entirely within bot th erules and the spirit of the game.  The same guy has no problem forming a team in SOLO DM .. which ois not part of the game. It is an exploit and therefore it is - if not outright cheating - it is at least against the spirit of the concept of SOLO DM.

 

Yet the Tanki community cries about what is legal and never utters a peep about what is cheating.

 

SMH ... but what the hell. When I see cowards team up I feel free to use supplies lavishly against them. Heh.

Edited January 2, 2017 by LittleWillie

[r_I_already_won0 2,339]

Free-users have to be battered so that they feel tempted to spend money. Why paying if you can easily enjoy the game for free?

 

I read "Druggers destroy the game for F2P users" but I understand "free-users can't enjoy the game so give them as much power as buyers". Doesn't consider paying, doesn't matter.

Well for me at least I consider my money as a gift to be given away.

 

If the game is doing well and bringing me daily enjoyment and relaxation, I would donate money to the game even in exchange for nothing, as a token of thanks. I would want the game to grow and thrive. :)

 

On the other hand if the game provides such advantage to buyers that it's basically like hacking, I will refuse to spend on principle.

 

 

Nobody's asking for as much power as buyers. And you seem to have set up non-druggers as some sort of twisted, fixed, image of ridiculously foolish noobs in your head.  We are asking for a more harmonious game. This means the buyers get some advantage and the non-buyers admire them for it, not stir up anger.  

 

Why is it that in all the other games I have experimented with, the term "buyer" didn't ever carry as much negative connotations as in TO? Bad system leads to bad feeling.  The buyers should be admired because they have the "coolest stuff", the most powerful weapons.

 

Not game-ruining hack imitations. Especially not when "standard battles" are meant for the "casual gamer".

[r_I_already_won0 2,339]

...

Yet the Tanki community cries about what is legal and never utters a peep about what is cheating.

Well, for me at least, my purpose is to redefine what "legal" really entitles the person to, and why it should be legal. The fact that it is that way again points to a badly-constructed system.  

 

SMH ... but what the hell. When I see cowards team up I feel free to use supplies lavishly against them. Heh.

 

Agree, teaming in DM is actually immensely frustrating.

 

Feel free to keep using your mission-earned drugs against them. :)

[railguniz4noobz 2,394]

I dont mind teaming in dm, more kills for everyone else. Not that i play dm anyways.

[LittleWillie 3,199]

Well for me at least I consider my money as a gift to be given away.

 

If the game is doing well and bringing me daily enjoyment and relaxation, I would donate money to the game even in exchange for nothing, as a token of thanks. I would want the game to grow and thrive. :)

 

On the other hand if the game provides such advantage to buyers that it's basically like hacking, I will refuse to spend on principle.

 

 

Nobody's asking for as much power as buyers. And you seem to have set up non-druggers as some sort of twisted, fixed, image of ridiculously foolish noobs in your head.  We are asking for a more harmonious game. This means the buyers get some advantage and the non-buyers admire them for it, not stir up anger.  

 

Why is it that in all the other games I have experimented with, the term "buyer" didn't ever carry as much negative connotations as in TO? Bad system leads to bad feeling.  The buyers should be admired because they have the "coolest stuff", the most powerful weapons.

 

Not game-ruining hack imitations. Especially not when "standard battles" are meant for the "casual gamer".

Wow. So well said.

[T-34-3m 360]

Drugging is considered as a playing style because some people just refuse to drug and call themselves pros for that. Yeah because not using an essential game mechanic makes you a pro  :rolleyes:

Not that I in any way advocate the nerf/removal of supplies, but I'd say a swordless run of the Legend of Zelda is an impressive feat. But only if you pull it off and don't complain about how unfair it is you have to fight a Darknut with a sword and all you can use is a candle/bow.

[dan146_tanker 770]

Tanki players are mostly noobs due to their young age and supplies in standard battles make up for lame skills of casual gamers who don't wanna/can't brain too much and provide them with fun while PRO Battle Pass is dedicated to those who wanna do something else more exciting than camping and flipping teammates. Moreover, the latter prevents parasites of standard battles to ruin battles of serious players.

 

 

Sadly there's not so many PRO battles with supplies disabled because Tanki doesn't promote them. This is all about business and you can't do nothing about it so adapt.

So let me get this straight. If you're young that makes you a noob? You trolling bro ;)

[T-34-3m 360]

Yep. Aside from a  minority, most children under fourteen are trash at games that aren't one-swipe casual games for their Iphone s25 pros. You should see my little sister trying to play Zelda.

[r_I_already_won0 2,339]

Yep. Aside from a  minority, most children under fourteen are trash at games that aren't one-swipe casual games for their Iphone s25 pros. You should see my little sister trying to play Zelda.

I understand when you state that most children cannot understand the economic concept/system of games and will act impulsively and regret their decisions afterward.

 

Claiming they are simply bad at the game is different.  One of my friend's sons (10 year old) is very good. As in, very, very good. :)

[wolverine848 13,097]

Sadly there's not so many PRO battles with supplies disabled because Tanki doesn't promote them. This is all about business and you can't do nothing about it so adapt.

Hold on...

 

What happened to the "The sky is too blue to play Pro-Battles" re-buttals?  The "There's tons of pro-Battles with supplies disabled".

 

You and your peeps slammed me because I stated that even with pro-Pass it was hard to find playable no-supply battles.

 

Change your mind? ( it's ok to say you were wrong - it's not a sign of weakness ;)  )