New option at creating battle or change rules!

[emmydoodlez 10]

Lol, i was the person who entered as the "new player" and tried to vote that mult out

 

~k77frank ^_^

 

This part:

Now someone of my team left and someone else joined and made use of the /vote

Edited July 29, 2013 by emmydoodlez

[emmydoodlez 10]

If this doesn't get changed, imma going to get a group of friends and enter xp battles with all prodigis and go raid the battle and take the fund ^_^

nobody can ban me for that ^_^

Edited July 29, 2013 by emmydoodlez

[emmydoodlez 10]

Using this account cuz yesterday in that battle, I called the viking smoky a "Noob ******" and got banned for a day for that.

So... IF I start raiding games, enemies may get mad and start cussing at me... then i can just take screens and get them banned, xaxa ^_^

[joostcool 5,942]

You got banned there? Wowzz :O

[apitov123 3]

Agreed

[Raphael2 3,263]

+1

[Aero.v2.0 1,456]

I agree with this. With wasp and rail and such

[franc3king 33]

No.. no.

 

This is a bad idea..

 

Since the one who got his hull/turret more upgraded is the stronger..

[canadarules 1,938]

I think you shouldnt see it as an elimination. More like check 1 weapon and 1 hull. Very boring for a normal game in silence, but that would be perfect for hornet/railgun battles. I agree that we will kill weapons if we allow all weapons except that one. But if you think further maybe tanki can implement the formats in there. So if you want to play light, you check that and only the allowed weapons and hulls for light Can join that battle. This isn't killing the game since you would do exactly the sane but less official and with a chance your game gets ruined.

Elimination it is another way of saying you are destroying the game. Taking out one hulls and weapon will just rise amount of druggers first off so they can feel like they are superior and have no competition in battle therefore meaning so mammoth and all heavy hulls out who will stop them and block flag. hornet railgun battles u can do with buddies always hats what i do once every 2 months (FBI when is the rail gun/wasp tourney??love to know). if one hull and light weapon is allowed they will choose rail and wasp so it is one hit kill to troll....then they all drug and the game no fun. This will kill the game if implemented and 80% of game will likely quit i might even too after 4 years if this is put in since i use mammoth plus thats the point of private battles with buds and clan mates this would be for loners mainly and better not be implemented or else this game will see alot of newbs with high ranks soon which will piss me off and many others who have worked hard to get to there rank with all there weapons and hulls! :angry: :excl:

 

It has been suggested many times and as I said, it's planned, there'sno point to post on Feedback again.

Well tanki will die than this is a flood topic why not close it?

Edited July 30, 2013 by canadarules

[Vikingsrallentando 3,058]

@canadarules Its not elimination, its restriction. There is always No supply Battles. XP battles are mainly with Russians. I could do a poll about the abbreviation XP and I bet not even half of the EN community would know what it stands for.

 

I understand your frustration joost.. I'm pretty regular XP person and when things don't go smoothly, it gets tiring and is a waste of time. Almost every single time you get a stray combo (something other than horn/rail) you have to either leave or muscle through to capture flags to end the match in order for them to leave. Then there is the impatient lunatics that join and immediately start shooting the second they've loaded when the teams are not balanced. It is a pain. In both situations, the battle is ruined.

 

I support the idea of 'restrictions' in the creation of a battle. It would make a difference in not only XP, would make VP and the various formats that are played a lot easier to manage. But this also gives me an idea..

 

What if there was a way to better control the start of the battle?  Maybe have it where every player must enter a command to say that they're ready. Once every player has signaled, everyone re spawns and the battle begins. Again, not only for XP, this could be good for almost any battle. Especially NSB, like for clan wars. And there would be no argument over someone not being at their perspective base. That solves two potential problems. Think I might be takin' this to feedback.

Edited July 30, 2013 by Vikingsrallentando

[Scientist 4,224]

Hornet & Rail, Dictator & Rail... I'm agree!

[joostcool 5,942]

Elimination it is another way of saying you are destroying the game. Taking out one hulls and weapon will just rise amount of druggers first off so they can feel like they are superior and have no competition in battle therefore meaning so mammoth and all heavy hulls out who will stop them and block flag. hornet railgun battles u can do with buddies always hats what i do once every 2 months (FBI when is the rail gun/wasp tourney??love to know). if one hull and light weapon is allowed they will choose rail and wasp so it is one hit kill to troll....then they all drug and the game no fun. This will kill the game if implemented and 80% of game will likely quit i might even too after 4 years if this is put in since i use mammoth plus thats the point of private battles with buds and clan mates this would be for loners mainly and better not be implemented or else this game will see alot of newbs with high ranks soon which will piss me off and many others who have worked hard to get to there rank with all there weapons and hulls! :angry: :excl:

 

Well tanki will die than this is a flood topic why not close it?

Once again, it is not taking out 1 weapon or hull, it is limiting to only 1 hull or weapon (or in case of formats, only the required weapons and hulls for formats.) look, right now there are players with the neccesity of playing hornet/railgun. These are the players who will use this feature. They are always playing hornet/railgun, but with a huge chance of someone ruïning their game) so basically nothing changes, you only make it more official and the amount of unsatisfied players lower. It is so easy, if you don't want to play like that, just don't join a game which has this, then all players are happy, right?

And do NOT ask if it can be closed, this is my idea, and if I find it necesarry, to close it, I'll ask alright?

 

@canadarules Its not elimination, its restriction. There is always No supply Battles. XP battles are mainly with Russians. I could do a poll about the abbreviation XP and I bet not even half of the EN community would know what it stands for.

 

I understand your frustration joost.. I'm pretty regular XP person and when things don't go smoothly, it gets tiring and is a waste of time. Almost every single time you get a stray combo (something other than horn/rail) you have to either leave or muscle through to capture flags to end the match in order for them to leave. Then there is the impatient lunatics that join and immediately start shooting the second they've loaded when the teams are not balanced. It is a pain. In both situations, the battle is ruined.

 

I support the idea of 'restrictions' in the creation of a battle. It would make a difference in not only XP, would make VP and the various formats that are played a lot easier to manage. But this also gives me an idea..

 

What if there was a way to better control the start of the battle?  Maybe have it where every player must enter a command to say that they're ready. Once every player has signaled, everyone re spawns and the battle begins. Again, not only for XP, this could be good for almost any battle. Especially NSB, like for clan wars. And there would be no argument over someone not being at their perspective base. That solves two potential problems. Think I might be takin' this to feedback.

Hmm, that sounds good, but there is a chance to abuse this. Just don't make that command, and you are a good troll/bully for the others, so then you must do that in command in 3 minutes, otherwise it's a kick-out for 5 minutes out of that game. Nice idea though!

[Katydid 97]

I like this idea and wished it would have been implemented a long time ago. There is a slight problem, though. I joined a battle already in progress. The title was in Russian so I didn't realize it was a wasp/railgun battle until I got into it. I saw my name mentioned a few times, but I don't understand Russian. Finally, a player simply said "GO!!" So, I "picked up my toys" and went home. I guess I was in the battle about 5 or so minutes. 

 

I think it would be interesting if in the "create" list it simply said "hornet/railgun" , for example, but the map would be chosen at random by the client. Just an idea.
 

[r_Best.of.all0 0]

everyone agrees and this will be made

Agreed.

Edited July 30, 2013 by r_Best.of.all0

[joostcool 5,942]

Heyy katy, its good to the hear the story from the side of the joiner. The name of the battle is XP. Which is a Russian abbreviation for hornet/railgun. Its Russian because there are a lot of Russian players and just a few English. Now most of the English know how to say 'leave' UB Russian, so English people tell them in 2 languages, but Russians are not that good in English that they can tell you to leave. I hope this explains it.

P.S. you've got my respect by leaving that battle :)

[High 773]

Yes!! A great idea. A thing that only allows a certain combo! The only problem would be that everyone would be doing this filter system and part of the fun is working with lots of different combos.

 

XMX

[joostcool 5,942]

Yes!! A great idea. A thing that only allows a certain combo! The only problem would be that everyone would be doing this filter system and part of the fun is working with lots of different combos.

 

XMX

That's the point, for example choose dictator firebird, and I garantee that nobody will join so there is no point in creating such a battle. Most players like to play with all combi's, so those battle will exist of course

[UNDESIRABLE 147]

I like this idea. No more noobs joining XP now

[D7D7 28]

That is a great idea but still needs to have limit or only for NS maybe cause i'm 100% some people will use that in wrong ways

[Zakintosh 39]

That's the point, for example choose dictator firebird, and I garantee that nobody will join so there is no point in creating such a battle. Most players like to play with all combi's, so those battle will exist of course

then join otherbatle

[meronnatu 151]

B) lol let raiders raid....its free online game ...so as long as its free ..just play  get mammoth smoky and savana or podige whichever and fight  or...remake another map and join with freinds.

 

freedom.for raiders.   B)

[meronnatu 151]

:P

[Amagi 1,728]

Awesome idea....

BUT! There might be many battles that excluding a certain weapon....

[canadarules 1,938]

@canadarules Its not elimination, its restriction. There is always No supply Battles. XP battles are mainly with Russians. I could do a poll about the abbreviation XP and I bet not even half of the EN community would know what it stands for.

 

I understand your frustration joost.. I'm pretty regular XP person and when things don't go smoothly, it gets tiring and is a waste of time. Almost every single time you get a stray combo (something other than horn/rail) you have to either leave or muscle through to capture flags to end the match in order for them to leave. Then there is the impatient lunatics that join and immediately start shooting the second they've loaded when the teams are not balanced. It is a pain. In both situations, the battle is ruined.

 

I support the idea of 'restrictions' in the creation of a battle. It would make a difference in not only XP, would make VP and the various formats that are played a lot easier to manage. But this also gives me an idea..

 

What if there was a way to better control the start of the battle?  Maybe have it where every player must enter a command to say that they're ready. Once every player has signaled, everyone re spawns and the battle begins. Again, not only for XP, this could be good for almost any battle. Especially NSB, like for clan wars. And there would be no argument over someone not being at their perspective base. That solves two potential problems. Think I might be takin' this to feedback.

 

 

Once again, it is not taking out 1 weapon or hull, it is limiting to only 1 hull or weapon (or in case of formats, only the required weapons and hulls for formats.) look, right now there are players with the neccesity of playing hornet/railgun. These are the players who will use this feature. They are always playing hornet/railgun, but with a huge chance of someone ruïning their game) so basically nothing changes, you only make it more official and the amount of unsatisfied players lower. It is so easy, if you don't want to play like that, just don't join a game which has this, then all players are happy, right?

And do NOT ask if it can be closed, this is my idea, and if I find it necesarry, to close it, I'll ask alright?

 

Hmm, that sounds good, but there is a chance to abuse this. Just don't make that command, and you are a good troll/bully for the others, so then you must do that in command in 3 minutes, otherwise it's a kick-out for 5 minutes out of that game. Nice idea though!

Once again you change your way of speaking. so lets now comment on this one.  limiting one hull is dumb as i said before people will trolll and put wasp with smoky or wasp with rail so that is a one hit kill. therefore increasing EXP.You clearly are backing up my point as you say making more unsatisfied player.but i have come up with a new idea how about have something that you can buy instead sort of like a no supply battle pass like Vikingsrall is trying to refer to i believe. Just not joining a game without this would be hard to find  SINCE MAMMOTH WOULD BE TAKE OUT OF THEM ALL! Secondly i didn't ask for it to be close i was wondering why he didn't close it when this is a flood topic as he said.

 

Nice idea VikingRalls about the you have to wait 4-5 minutes before you can start a battle it will allow users to get in and not be down 4 or 5 flags before they can play.

In all i will never support this idea and all it will do is make people quit if it is free!

[32clemente 13]

Would really be a great idea, just hope they'll implement it soon