New option at creating battle or change rules!

[joostcool 5,942]

Sounds easy, you should try it. It took me before the reopening of the topic also many posts to make you understand what I mean. And after it got reopened, I have to explain it again and again. I know you like to point the finger at someone else, but thats turning the facts. I am the one who explains you again and again, and you still don't (want to) get it.

 

Alright, it is this simple. You like the idea? Upvote and use it maybe later.

You don't like the idea? Great, downvote, and ignore the topic. It won't bother you at all.

 

You are definitely wrong by calling me 'dumb' and 'a silly person' (and everything you like to say about me when I am not there), I can't take your arguments serious like that, and the fact that you did not reply completely on what I said makes you look like you're just flaming.

Edited January 10, 2014 by joostcool

[legenddestroyer 824]

I agree Joost... because recently a lot of  " noobs " have been ruining XP/Bp battles ect. I haven't been able to play a decent XP battle in weeks, without it getting ruined by a player who joins with another combo. I would definitely enjoy a mode were you can choose specific weapons/hulls that are allowed. Like you only want hornet/wasp/rails in a specific battle, you press the mode ect and people with different combos can't join. It would be Nice if it happens  ^_^

Edited January 11, 2014 by legenddestroyer

[canadarules 1,938]

I am a fan of playing the so-called XPbattles. For those who don't know what this is, that are battles where only hornet/railgun is allowed. You can mainly find these battles on server 1. Most of the times in sandbox, no-supplies and often the name 'xp-k'. These are great battles with Russians, it all goes perfectly polite, we wait for full teams are playing for the skills and fun, fund does not really matter at all. 9 on the 10 times this all works perfectly and you have a great battle, but sadly 1 on the 10 times a player has a wrong combi or doesn't wait for full teams and just plays. Sometimes they leave after you've asked them, but sometimes he doesn't understand anything or just stays to bully us. The last point is what I want to talk about. Today in a xpbattle in sandbox we were playing until someone had to leave. It was 5-5 on 8 flags, very hard but exciting battle. Instead of a hornet/railgun a Viking/smoky joined with savanna which has protection against railgun. We asked him kindly to leave and take hornet/railgun. He didn't, he was attempting to kill us. We started to kill him, he had no chance against 4 railguns while enemy team did nothing except for him. Almost always the player leaves, but this time he stayed and was even chatting with us while he tried to kill us. He wasn't leaving but kept killing us, while we killed him constantly. He was really bullying us. We decided to use /vote and guess what: a Russian mod came soon in spectator mode. But he couldn't do anything because that dude didn't offend any rule at all. the mod tried to talk with him, but he didn't leave. So the mod couldn't do anything and left while this dude was ruining our game. And he kept on killing. Now someone of my team left and someone else joined and made use of the /vote. Now the mod came back threatening to ban us for false reports while this dude was ruining the game. I am not going to let down the mod because there is no rule on it to ban that dude, but I just explained you that this shouldn't be happening. That's why I suggest an option for hornet/rail gun so only that combination can join the battle, there is no way to abuse it at all. If that is impossible I would like an edit on the rules that if a battle is named after certain weapons or hulls that moderators are allowed to ban the people who don't meet that requirements.

 

Written on my mobile phone, so there might be some mistakes, and I will post this on feedback, but I would like to have your opinion about it :)

 

Joost

 

had another idea which goes quite a bit along with mine, so I'll it here since the most people only read the first and the last post of a topic.

Sorry but i can't see this happening. First off if there is elimination of weapons it will be unfair and many will quit since people will eliminate certain guns and hulls such as mammoth and freeze or shaft even since they like hornet mainly. Plus this is not a good idea since the game will become lame and there will be no competition. eliminate freeze flags easy to get. eliminate shaft flags easy to get. you are basically trying to promote power leveling. most would also have only one gun thats good and all the rest bad not fair no way this suggestion goes through! They would have done it already if they wanted to.

I think you shouldnt see it as an elimination. More like check 1 weapon and 1 hull. Very boring for a normal game in silence, but that would be perfect for hornet/railgun battles. I agree that we will kill weapons if we allow all weapons except that one. But if you think further maybe tanki can implement the formats in there. So if you want to play light, you check that and only the allowed weapons and hulls for light Can join that battle. This isn't killing the game since you would do exactly the sane but less official and with a chance your game gets ruined.

Because this battle was great, 5-5 same chances, there was already a fund of more then 1000 so, if we would have left, the gameruiner would get all the fund... then he realizes this works and he goes into another and keeps doing that.

Yup, it just happened again to me... there was not even a fund to steal... he waited till everybody went out of the game, and then left by himself... -.-

You got banned there? Wowzz :o

Elimination it is another way of saying you are destroying the game. Taking out one hulls and weapon will just rise amount of druggers first off so they can feel like they are superior and have no competition in battle therefore meaning so mammoth and all heavy hulls out who will stop them and block flag. hornet railgun battles u can do with buddies always hats what i do once every 2 months (FBI when is the rail gun/wasp tourney??love to know). if one hull and light weapon is allowed they will choose rail and wasp so it is one hit kill to troll....then they all drug and the game no fun. This will kill the game if implemented and 80% of game will likely quit i might even too after 4 years if this is put in since i use mammoth plus thats the point of private battles with buds and clan mates this would be for loners mainly and better not be implemented or else this game will see alot of newbs with high ranks soon which will piss me off and many others who have worked hard to get to there rank with all there weapons and hulls! :angry: :excl:

 

Well tanki will die than this is a flood topic why not close it?

@canadarules Its not elimination, its restriction. There is always No supply Battles. XP battles are mainly with Russians. I could do a poll about the abbreviation XP and I bet not even half of the EN community would know what it stands for.

 

I understand your frustration joost.. I'm pretty regular XP person and when things don't go smoothly, it gets tiring and is a waste of time. Almost every single time you get a stray combo (something other than horn/rail) you have to either leave or muscle through to capture flags to end the match in order for them to leave. Then there is the impatient lunatics that join and immediately start shooting the second they've loaded when the teams are not balanced. It is a pain. In both situations, the battle is ruined.

 

I support the idea of 'restrictions' in the creation of a battle. It would make a difference in not only XP, would make VP and the various formats that are played a lot easier to manage. But this also gives me an idea..

 

What if there was a way to better control the start of the battle?  Maybe have it where every player must enter a command to say that they're ready. Once every player has signaled, everyone re spawns and the battle begins. Again, not only for XP, this could be good for almost any battle. Especially NSB, like for clan wars. And there would be no argument over someone not being at their perspective base. That solves two potential problems. Think I might be takin' this to feedback.

Once again, it is not taking out 1 weapon or hull, it is limiting to only 1 hull or weapon (or in case of formats, only the required weapons and hulls for formats.) look, right now there are players with the neccesity of playing hornet/railgun. These are the players who will use this feature. They are always playing hornet/railgun, but with a huge chance of someone ruïning their game) so basically nothing changes, you only make it more official and the amount of unsatisfied players lower. It is so easy, if you don't want to play like that, just don't join a game which has this, then all players are happy, right?

And do NOT ask if it can be closed, this is my idea, and if I find it necesarry, to close it, I'll ask alright?

 

Hmm, that sounds good, but there is a chance to abuse this. Just don't make that command, and you are a good troll/bully for the others, so then you must do that in command in 3 minutes, otherwise it's a kick-out for 5 minutes out of that game. Nice idea though!

That's the point, for example choose dictator firebird, and I garantee that nobody will join so there is no point in creating such a battle. Most players like to play with all combi's, so those battle will exist of course

Once again you change your way of speaking. so lets now comment on this one.  limiting one hull is dumb as i said before people will trolll and put wasp with smoky or wasp with rail so that is a one hit kill. therefore increasing EXP.You clearly are backing up my point as you say making more unsatisfied player.but i have come up with a new idea how about have something that you can buy instead sort of like a no supply battle pass like Vikingsrall is trying to refer to i believe. Just not joining a game without this would be hard to find  SINCE MAMMOTH WOULD BE TAKE OUT OF THEM ALL! Secondly i didn't ask for it to be close i was wondering why he didn't close it when this is a flood topic as he said.

 

Nice idea VikingRalls about the you have to wait 4-5 minutes before you can start a battle it will allow users to get in and not be down 4 or 5 flags before they can play.

In all i will never support this idea and all it will do is make people quit if it is free!

When all players have loaded then the "ready" signals can be engaged. You wouldn't be able to take flags before the start. Its the whole point of the idea.

You don't support the idea based on personal situations. Many have said on this topic that they like the idea.

yes because they are wasp and hornet users that get killed by shaft.bu this should be like a non supply battle pass and has to be bought if so

Let them troll? Nobody will join that, because they will be killed in 1 shot. and if nobody joins, their troll fails, so it is pointless to troll which makes the trolls disappear. Look, it is your choice if you join that 'limited' battle. If you don't want to play that wasp/railgun battle, then you simply don't join. Simple, right?

Well i can't get through to you. you keep going with one part of statement and picking at it. make it a paid thing 2 times more than non supply battle pass and i am fine with it. other than it is a stupid idea. Vikingralls idea for the ready once all members are ready to play is good because in team wars u would need that!

Of course I go for one statement, because that is the most important one, you just don't want to get it -.-

And no, not a pass for 10K, look how much the players the NSbattles hate because of the price, now you want to make it even more expensive? Oh come on, I don't care paying 5K for a nspass, but the 5K for the NSpass plus the 10K for your pass, per month is way to much, then it isn't worth it at all. I don't really see the problem for you....

First off who cares about age. second off no need to bring that into here. third off more fair than where is the challenge to this game. fourth of all u try strip me of freedom here what kind of adult are u trying to crush a kids confidence. Fifith if shaft is taken out of ur game u will see how there is no challenge and how boring it it trust me i get bored at times since i sit on top leader boards. Unlike you probably.

 

Thank you for finally figuring out that they won't make it more air because if it is there is no challenge which i have been saying the whole time. plus they never use these ideas for real game issues. they would have put it in at start if they wanted to.

 

 

The problems is softies like u who want to eliminate freeze in CTF matches so they can drug get flag and leave. Secondly you have to pay for NS battle pass something special u should have to pay for this too. This is a very stupid idea to in my opinion don't like it they shut up.

 

lmfao who doesn't get ban in these days. ooo shiny things like that smile. Yes on zero now is no zero before rebalance when they had twins for 700 to become m3. loved those time but lag in year on was horrible. We all know that the rebalance made things harder to collect and now u lose alot of crystals mainly i do since i am on top leader board to support the newbs at the bottom of it. what the hell!u mean 30 000 crystals everyone has. i had over 100,000 crystals after re balance little to know that in the weeks following they multiply everything by 10 to accommodate the high prices like WTF. i would have had 1 million crystals.

Wow... it would be so much better if we would have this discussion in my native language because you just don't get my point O_O try to understand me man. 

Once again, I want to have 1 weapon and 1 hull to play in 1 battle, you get that? Just one single combi, right? That's not that hard to understand I believe. Now, this has nothing to do with eliminating freeze's because Freeze's are not supposed to be in the so-called XP-battles (do you want me to explain what I am meaning? Cuz you don't seem to get it) so, XP-battles are played without freezes. If there comes a freeze, the game won't be played because they are waiting for a full team with the same combi which is not freeze!!. Now, to prevent from trollers and bullyers to join such a XP-battle it would be better if it would be official, you get that? Good, I hope you get my point now -.-

 

And NEVER EVER call me a softie or someone who wants to eliminate freezes in CTF battles because I don't play CTF battles, I only play XP-battles. And Yes every month I buy a NSpass, but it's just stupid to make it cost every month 15000 crystals to be able to join XPbattles! They will disappear and the weapon with the most skills won't be played anymore, you happy now? 

A rule i thought i show you.

- Are personal conversations (use PM for private discussions).

aka in game chat stays in game.

Also if i am a kid why are u not learning to ignore me

Stick to topic

 

No i am not i am just voicing an opinion that you guys keep shooting down. so you guys started arguing with me. so if anything u guys should be ban along with me if i am! Also he is bringing it off topic i am staying with it.

But yeah still disagree i am done on this topic since i am showing the flaws of your little plan for eliminating guns. Just trying to make some peoples ideas flawless now have flaws. thats why i been saying make it a pay item and i okay with it. anywhere from 5000-10000 cry it should cost. bye bye i am off this topic now

Canadarules, did you forget to answer me or... 

 

anyways I agree with vikingsrall because you pick elimination of Freeze in here while that is completely not the point.

You posted something i never noticed but the point is if this is free they all will tick off freeze and shaft the end. Shaft and freeze are gone there is no challenge game. No challenge=no fun to game(many would agree) this should be paid product(around 5000 to 10000 crystals) thats my last post on this topic bye bye

seems like you still don't get my point O_O can't believe this O_O

Look, or you play with only 1 certain combination, or you play with everything! There is no such a thing as all weapons except freeze and shaft. Imagine a Silence where only thunder/viking is allowed.

1. There are not many people playing that, so it will be empty

2. Yeah, it's boring, that's why people won't play it!

So, if you don't play it, you play the game with every combi allowed. easy, right?

Yes. But as was in confusion before. Only 1 particular gun in a battle, and only 1 particular hull. Not 8 hulls, but no freeze! 

This also makes it easier for clanwars in formats. If Devs write some nice script they could make battles which looks whether a clan doesn't have the wrong combinations in it.

Reasons why it will it is dumb:

 

1. Discrimination against other turret users- Many users dislike twins....most of them would just make the battle so there is no twins thus making most of the twins population wiped out (Same goes for shaft, freeze and smoky)....the only weapons left would be the most popular (Railgun and Isida)

 

2. Just play with your friends if you want to play specified battles- This would allow you to battle with the preferred combo of your choice instead of making Tanki wasting there time developing new software for basically nothing.

 

3. No diversity in the battlefield-  In the battlefield having different combos being used by everyone makes the game fun and is what makes you try to win even if losing because there is always hope that someone can join with a certain combo that helps boost your team. Taking at that combo would leave many wondering will we ever get out of this loss streak.....they will quit the game and the game will than forever end......

 

 

So in all this topic was closed and should have stayed closed as it is a repeat topic...too much work finding the rule for that

 

No argument just stating my opinion here

Thanks for your opinion. Let me explain some things which you don't understand.

 

1. It is not kicking 1 weapon. There are at the moment 9 weapons and I want battles where only 1 weapon is available. I am not talking about battles where 5/7/8 weapons are allowed because that would be unfair indeed.

 

2. Friends are not always online. I play this when I have 30 minutes nothing to do. It would take me 15 minutes to arrange a battle. The other 15 minutes are not enough to have this battle so it is nice you can such a battle instantly.

 

Another thing is that your friends begin to become boring. You know who is better, the results will be always the same, so diversity in enemies would be nice.

 

3. This is a choice which has to be made by the tanker himself. Not by you neither by the admins. If tankers think it is boring they don't join such battles. It's that simple. But in the meantime other people (XP-players) will play it thankfully. That you won't use it doesn't mean it's a bad idea.

 

As for your rule, this topic was auto-closed because there was no more activity. I kindly requested a mod yo reopen it.

Mainly on server 1. Times: Always. Just go to it, search a sandbox with the name of xp-k or something similar to it, and you'll find it. Please don't forget to put hornet/railgun and no protection. Although, you have hornet M2 I think, so you have the right to wear 10% protection because you'll be one-shotted otherwise.

Oh ya almost forgot to add. if you are facing generalissmos in a battle and u make it firebird only. what will happen is they will all use zeus and have it micro upgraded so therefore your point is invalid

That is so easy to solve. Just don't join that battle. You join such battles when you want to. You don't pick it randomly. Look, when you know there is for example a freeze in a battle defending, and you really don't like freezes, why would you join? Most likely you wouldn't join, same here. If you don't like it you don't do it. If you like it, you do it.

There is something called a challenge in this game. The challenge you need to overcome and is what makes the game fun. Plus all the battles will be with hornets and wasps only singling out mammoth and titans or titans and no mammoths making there be less people playing. all this would do is make people mad at tanki. they already stated that they want to make the battlefield more diverse not less diverse. This idea will likely chances be denied if suggested. just type a battle name in and hope they all follow along with it. there is no need for this ridiculous feature in the game. they made no supply already and no micro upgrade battles which i think is enough done. plus new physics was to even out hulls and turrets and it has so therefore no  need for this.

 

This idea=Useless now

And again you managed to show me that you really don't understand my idea  :lol:

You know XP = Hornet/Railgun right? Otherwise I know why you don't understand it xD So, is there any fun and/or challinging part in these XPbattles when there are smokies, freezes etc. etc. Nope, there isn't, we want to play a skilled game without other weapons interfearing. It is an addition to the current game, not a replacement! As I said before, it is your choice if you want these battles or not. If you want your 'challenging game', go ahead, do it, I don't care. But I and many other want to play a game without problems of other weapons/hulls. If you don't want to play with my idea, you just don't. It is selfish to say it is useless if YOU can't use it, but many others can't. 

 

Also, you got to explain me why in clanwars there are no freezes, no Isida, no smokies, no mammoths. These things bring a challenge to the game right? Why should we make clanwars boring? Come on man...

 

Yunlong, XP = hornet/railgun, not as you think 'experience'

well since you clearly are to hard headed to think for once and actaully read what i say.........you would notice a couple things......i stated that 99% of battles would be segregated. most would be without mammoth and titan.......this would probably kill off all the heavy hull users since over half the game is railgun hornet/wasp users. Learn to read what i say. there is more behind it than i say you actually need to be thinking when you read it.

 

Clan wars have no freezes no isidas or heavy hulls for simply one reason of each.

Isidas- would stand by flag (m3 at brigadier)

Freeze would stand by flag (my i forgot when but near isida)

Mammoth what the freeze and isida are using.

Mammoth can only be obtained m3 at generalissimo.

The mammoth freeze would never die since there is a mammoth isida and will be impossible to capture a flag basically. Also the battlefield needs to be as even as possible hulls wise so that the generalissimos don't have a huge advantage over everyone and just a slight one.

Ohh really? Would it kill mammoth/titan? A few posts ago you stated that diversity makes the game fun, and now half of players will decide to make the game boring and use this.... nice, but that's contradictory. And yes, it is boring to play against the same combi, because for example a hornet freeze vs hornet/freeze won't really do.

 

Okay.. but in game they are there... so basically organizers decided to make clan wars more exciting by putting formats (or for you: removing certain weapons and hulls) freeze users won't be able to play for clans. Go complain, it is even worse than my idea

 

Ohh, and I know how to think, so do you. The only difference is that I don't think for myself but for the entire game and their players. Don't deny because you are the only one who disagrees here.

Clearly you are not able to make connections to my other written work. Please learn to read it first than comment.

Mammoth and titan make diversity....not explaining this again read the stuff i wrote before. If you actually understand what i am saying than comment

Sounds easy, you should try it. It took me before the reopening of the topic also many posts to make you understand what I mean. And after it got reopened, I have to explain it again and again. I know you like to point the finger at someone else, but thats turning the facts. I am the one who explains you again and again, and you still don't (want to) get it.

 

Alright, it is this simple. You like the idea? Upvote and use it maybe later.

You don't like the idea? Great, downvote, and ignore the topic. It won't bother you at all.

 

You are definitely wrong by calling me 'dumb' and 'a silly person' (and everything you like to say about me when I am not there), I can't take your arguments serious like that, and the fact that you did not reply completely on what I said makes you look like you're just flaming.

 

 

To sum it all up you only have on argument and that is if you don't want to play this battle don't join hahahahahah. Vikings has a good idea though which i will agree to. wait until more people join before you can start

[joostcool 5,942]

To sum it all up you only have on argument and that is if you don't want to play this battle don't join hahahahahah. Vikings has a good idea though which i will agree to. wait until more people join before you can start

The whole game is based on that...

If you don't want to play TDM, don't join.

If you don't want to play with a hornet, pick another hull.

If you don't want to be in a team, don't apply.

And there are so many more additions tanki gives in this game. I am sure it won't harm if my idea would be implemented. It is just 1 of those things you can choose to do or not.

 

A spoiler up there on your post would be nice I think.

Edited January 14, 2014 by joostcool

[Mr.SV.ENS 738]

Congrats on your avatar, Joost  ;)

[DR.PRO.RlCOCHET 39]

It won't change the game in any way, there will always be inactive players, players who use prodigi, etc..

 

But since the percentage of the ones ruining will decrease, I agree with this idea.

[ognjen556 231]

canada,think about the whole community... not just you.

[red_tank_the_best 300]

I think that better way to solve the problem is to update kicking system so if 80%+ players in battle want to kick player, they all would klick kick button(it should be always avilable).

[Glitch_Stream 4]

There will be hundreds of battles with only a couple of people (LOW BATTLE FUNDS)

[symgy 43]

post it in the IDEA place.

[Reckoning 178]

"XP battles"

Please add "rails only" in the battle name so that masses can understand. most of the players are not forum users so they might not be familiar with name "xp battles" it happened to me,on the contrary i would say many times i was offended by the players in these "xp battles" when i joined not knowing the combo. they abuse throw slurs and start destroying. pls see the other side of the coin as well.

[joostcool 5,942]

I think that better way to solve the problem is to update kicking system so if 80%+ players in battle want to kick player, they all would klick kick button(it should be always avilable).

That wouldn't really solve my problem... kick system doesn't work in Sandbox :lol:

 

There will be hundreds of battles with only a couple of people (LOW BATTLE FUNDS)

2000 battle fund for maybe 30 minutes playing is not bad, and it is for the fun, not for the crystals.

 

"XP battles"

 

Please add "rails only" in the battle name so that masses can understand. most of the players are not forum users so they might not be familiar with name "xp battles" it happened to me,on the contrary i would say many times i was offended by the players in these "xp battles" when i joined not knowing the combo. they abuse throw slurs and start destroying. pls see the other side of the coin as well.

Well, ''railguns only'' doesn't make sense for the Russians and the Germans. XP is Russian, and still the most players in these games are Russian, so I understand it is called XP.

As for their rudeness, I won't try to make it look legalized, but these days XP battles are ruined almost everytime, I think only 5% of the XP battles are how they are supposed to be.

[Psycho 586]

no, bad bad bad idea, all i see is a boring tanki where higher ranks will have upgrdaed tanks and guns versus nubs who just get killed 

[canadarules 1,938]

canada,think about the whole community... not just you.

:huh:

I am dumby <_<

 

 

 

 

That wouldn't really solve my problem... kick system doesn't work in Sandbox :lol:

Hey look at that he wants it for himself

 

 

 

no, bad bad bad idea, all i see is a boring tanki where higher ranks will have upgrdaed tanks and guns versus nubs who just get killed 

Grab a group of friends and play with them

Edited January 15, 2014 by canadarules

[red_tank_the_best 300]

That wouldn't really solve my problem... kick system doesn't work in Sandbox :lol:

I know, but adding this to sandbox as "special kicking system" would use a lot.

[Reckoning 178]

 

Well, ''railguns only'' doesn't make sense for the Russians and the Germans. XP is Russian, and still the most players in these games are Russian, so I understand it is called XP.

As for their rudeness, I won't try to make it look legalized, but these days XP battles are ruined almost everytime, I think only 5% of the XP battles are how they are supposed to be.

Why are you inserting Russians and Germans on english servers? never mind if it doesn't make sense for Germans and Russians(although i think it would) what matters most are the players on english servers. therefore i believe adding "rails only" to the battle name can prevent the players who doesn't have that combo from entering the match,also you too can recruit proper players for the XP battle.

[red_tank_the_best 300]

Today i've dominated in xp match but again another game ruiner with thunder joined and ruined our battle,fund and took goldbox :angry:

[joostcool 5,942]

Why are you inserting Russians and Germans on english servers? never mind if it doesn't make sense for Germans and Russians(although i think it would) what matters most are the players on english servers. therefore i believe adding "rails only" to the battle name can prevent the players who doesn't have that combo from entering the match,also you too can recruit proper players for the XP battle.

 

XP would die when we don't involve Germans and Russians. As you can see, Russians can see our battle names, and if they don't understand the word 'railgun' they'll join without the required combination. So, it is important to do it XP, just to make the majority of the players understand where those matches are for.

[Reckoning 178]

 

XP would die when we don't involve Germans and Russians. As you can see, Russians can see our battle names, and if they don't understand the word 'railgun' they'll join without the required combination. So, it is important to do it XP, just to make the majority of the players understand where those matches are for.

fair enough. have the other way around. Players need to be made aware of "XP battles" and its format.