Rule 2.1 & 2.2

[TottenhamHotspur_FC 8]

http://en.tankiforum.com/index.php?showtopic=181651&hl=

 

Semyon did not really answer my question (I wanted more answers from actual moderators) and KidVegito posted flooded it with off-topic posts. Not sure why it was locked.

 

--

 

What is the extent of the rule 2.1 and 2.2?

 

2.1. - insulting other users, sending provocative messages via chat, disturbing other chat users' communication, swearing;

 

2.2. - using profane language (anywhere, in any form) expressly or implicitly;

 

So for insult, usually a single moderator will take care of an incident. However, this will depend on the moderator's decision. So if there are two moderators; one is strict, but one is rather lenient on things. A user says "shut up and go away" to another user, let's say, in the chat. If the strict moderator is online, most likely the user will get ban. However, if a lenient moderator is online, do you think that he will ban that user? If I was a moderator and someone said to me "shut up please and piss off", I would not ban them because I am not offended by that. If a moderator was offended by that, why should they even become one?

 

Rule 2.2 - Kind of like above, different moderators will think differently when it comes to this rule. Sometimes I use "hell" and "damn" in the chat and forum, but nothing happens; while other times if I do, then I will get a ban. However, about the "abbreviations" part, I need some clarification. So if I type "WTF", then that is understandable because most people will know what it stands for. But what if I put something like "YAARBDA" (you are a really big dumb ), will I get banned for that? I don't think any of you reading this knows that that stands for, but how come I won't get banned for saying that?

[r_nuclearbom0 62]

You are violating a rule yourself as well:

 

3.8. - Continue discussing topics that have been locked or deleted by the Administration. To contact the Administration, use Private Messages;

 

I am just warning you. And it's exactly as Semyon said: Each moderator interpetates the rules him/herself. But you can search for it on the internet.

[King.Ghost 44]

You could post it in the questions and anwsers

[FaaiqBilal1 795]

You could post it in the questions and anwsers

NUB ITS A GENERAL DISCUSSION TOPIC FOR SOME RULES DONT POST THIS WHERE IT ISNT NEEDED :@

sorry for caps I just got really angry

[r_nuclearbom0 62]

It's also a question, so I think it's normal to tell someone there's a topic only for questions&answers. I don't think it was necessary to get angry, and to insult someone with 'nub'.

[TottenhamHotspur_FC 8]

You are violating a rule yourself as well:

 

3.8. - Continue discussing topics that have been locked or deleted by the Administration. To contact the Administration, use Private Messages;

 

I am just warning you. And it's exactly as Semyon said: Each moderator interpetates the rules him/herself. But you can search for it on the internet.

Same to you.

 

3.2. - Do not correspond to the scope of a certain forum/section/category.

 

--

 

Continue to discuss a topic that was locked because of other players flooding and going off topic, ok. "Totally my problem". And did you even read Semyon's reply?

 

"It actually depends not on individual moderators, but on their admin who decides together"

 

This was actually why it got locked. Some users randomly decided to post things that had no correlation with the topic.

 

Too bad I can't downvote your post with my other banned accounts.