Why your opinion matters

[FederalBureauFBI 2,881]

Yes..?

[Meliora 1,652]

I gave my opinion on about four things which could be changed in the forum. One of them was done, meaning you've forgotten about the rest? So my opinion only matters 25 percent? I'd like an explanation as to why my other points can't/won't be done.

[semyonkirov 29,038]

I gave my opinion on about four things which could be changed in the forum. One of them was done, meaning you've forgotten about the rest? So my opinion only matters 25 percent? I'd like an explanation as to why my other points can't/won't be done.

The fact that your opinion matters doesn't mean that each thing you suggest will be implemented. Otherwise we would be just implementing all the ideas we get, that are contradicting some times. Have ideas - feel free to post them on Feedback site or in a special thread called Ideas and Suggestions. Whether your idea will be implemented or not will depend on many factors.

[Piety 70]

The fact that your opinion matters doesn't mean that each thing you suggest will be implemented. Otherwise we would be just implementing all the ideas we get, that are contradicting some times. Have ideas - feel free to post them on Feedback site or in a special thread called Ideas and Suggestions. Whether your idea will be implemented or not will depend on many factors.

Off topic for once but can u give me a smiley face so I can remember it for the rest if the year??

 

I seriously will sir,

I'm a buyer a heavy one

[adem_2011 170]

I do understand everybody would like a refund but it will never happen from now on.

 

 This is balancing, NOT rebalance.

 

Now, I am not asking you if you want refund or not, we are clear here that you do. What I am asking you is do you want another update 123?

 

If you ask me, having something like we've done with funds is far less fair then not giving you another refund.

I am a Shaft Player and one reason why I chose Shaft was not only because of its sniper mode but also because that it could shoot like thunder without sniping

Now knowing that it will take 8 sec to reload and yet can not destroy a tank in one shoot, makes its value miserable. Imagine most of Shafts are destroying a tank with two shots.

First shot is fully charged and second is just regular shot. But now there won't be any time to shoot second time before getting destroyed.. If this happens to shaft then I would like to give my shaft away and choose another weapon instead

When I chose the weapons that I have bought and upgraded, I considered their current specifications. And if you change the specifications then you should refund us

Then bring REBALANCE and I will get rid of my shaft m3 gladly and buy another weapon instead of it

 

Because what I have bought, I have bought because of the current specifications.. Imagine you order a new car from a company which can speed up to 240 km/hour and you pay 50 thousand euro

You take your car and only one year later it is having malfunctions and your car can speed up to 180 km/hour

what would you do? you would go to company and give your car back and ask them to refund your 50 thousand euro, right ? Because you bought the car because of its specifications

Now you say Shaft has to wait 8 sec for reloading. I didn't buy my Shaft m3 because of that. I bought it because it takes faster to reload and also can fight like thunder, but if you take this specifications back then refund us, so that we can give it back and buy another weapon instead. Perhaps a railgun. Because they also take 3 sec to shoot and they can do this while moving. Much more better

 

Now you are telling me that increasing reload time from 3 sec to 8 sec is not a REBALANCE ? Really?

So you might think that I have chose this weapon for 8 sec reload time in the future ? Because I am psychic and I can see the future changes in the game ?

And you call this is not a REBALANCE ? Because we are small kids who can be beguiled by candies?

 

Please grow up. Say that refund is not gonna happen. But don't say that this is not a rebalance.. Then what was the previous one ? Then that was also not a rebalance

What is the meaning of "RE" If you change the balance and bring it to new balance, it is "RE" balance. So you accept or not, but you can't change the facts that this is a REBALANCE

 

Edited November 7, 2013 by adem_2011

[JonathanBernatowicz 119]

~big thing of text~

Unfortunately, the developers have decided that some weapons are too powerful and some weapons are too weak. So they are changing the physics so they become in harmony. As Mr. Nut kindly said, they cannot give us a refund, because then they'll have to minimize the battle fund again and we all go through this hardship. This is not officially called a "Rebalance" because it's much more slight than that. It's just slight changes they're making they're not rebalancing everything, but changing some small aspects of weapons/hulls.

[r_Damn_Slow0 12,476]

Yes, really major. But I can't say what it will be as if I say and it doesn't happen, you will eat me, won't you?  :lol:

OMG !!!!!!!!!    HE HAS GOT A SENSE OF HUMOUR !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!   :o  :o  :o  :o  :o    :P  :P  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  ;) 

 

I do understand everybody would like a refund but it will never happen from now on.

 

...... this is where our dear opex makes a king speech :P :P  .................... This is balancing, NOT rebalance.

and  here the king's speech ends with an outro  B)

Yooo  my "Totally Nutz Buddy" :P

 

Might I suggest, ditch the term balancing and start using Refining or Fine-tuning ... theses are the more politically correct English terms ;) and helps rid the confusion people get from balancing (they all think its a rebalance )

 

Also concerning the new physics and coming changes,, use the word improvement , adding value , making things even better , etc .... ;)

 

 

humbly yours

 

your hero

 

 

 

 

 

ps: yes yes i know,, i'm here a month late,, i'm damn_slow, don't forget !!!!! ;)

[r_Damn_Slow0 12,476]

Fine print

 

 

IF YOU LIKE THE ABOVE POST PLEASE VOTE IT UP BY CLICKING ON THE GREEN UP-ARROW ON THE BOTTOM RIGHT OF THE POST (YOU MAY NEED TO LOG IN TO USE THIS FEATURE)

 

Why do that?  It'll help those people who complained in this topic that there can be no fun in forum without trolling and the quality of the posts are and their humour are bound to be poor ... help us open their eyes and make your community, our community better and fun without trolling !

 

---

 

now lets all go out walk up and down the streets with our home-made "hippopotamus bum"wide banners that say NO TO TROLLS !!!!!

[JonathanBernatowicz 119]

~vote my above post up~

lol, k :lol:

[Piety 70]

My opinion matters?

 

I think that the staff do so much work, so much so that they should get paid

 

Ppl line FBI work too hard.

[Piety 70]

My opinion matters?

 

I think that the staff do so much work, so much so that they should get paid

 

Ppl line FBI work too hard.

[Raphael2 3,263]

We already do, and that doesn't have to matter usual players.

Sorry, Raph.

[Piety 70]

We already do, and that doesn't have to matter usual players.

Sorry, Raph.

How much u get paid

 

And reply to ur pm

[Raphael2 3,263]

that doesn't have to matter usual players.

Sorry, Raph.

Any of the staff members can say how much they are paid, how it works etc.. You can't know, sorry.

[Opex-Rah 5,377]

Might I suggest, ditch the term balancing and start using Refining or Fine-tuning ... theses are the more politically correct English terms ;) ...

Doesn't look like "fine-tuning patch" to me

http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/forum/topic/8796589934

[ziaayadad 26]

Doesn't look like "fine-tuning patch" to me

http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/forum/topic/8796589934

Yu think we got a chance of getting the rebalance thing in time for the end if this month?

 

 

Btw u loom cute in the tanki tournament pictures

[r_Damn_Slow0 12,476]

 

Doesn't look like "fine-tuning patch" to me

http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/forum/topic/8796589934

 

hey there :)

 

well its kinda funny, its like the War of the Words  :D :D

 

But honestly, the root of the problem lies in the fact that tanki chose to use the word "rebalance" on update 114 which was in reality a complete overhaul of the game and ever since then when the lil kids around here see the word "balance" they all go about screaming "omg omg omg another one !! "

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lOEi4LreM34

Edited November 21, 2013 by r_Damn_Slow0

[Jayjey419 41]

Funny thing is that some 'Mods' can be arrogant at times :s i've experience this alot, i'm not being Rude but can some mods please reply when they needed the most... And I understand they can be busy but, 'i saw a mod ban a player, few seconds later i called for his attention, but i got no reply' :/ Well some are doing great job and keeping the peace in game/battles Great work. No disrespect! 

Edited December 1, 2013 by Jayjey419

[Freshbakedpie 60]

Umm seymon , how much do I need to keep my karma clean for ? Its been clead for about 4 months I think

[Freshbakedpie 60]

And I would suggest a new rebalance too , after the 2013 rebalance players went mad about it but now I think we need another rebalance cuz in my opinion we do need to clean our garages from time to time , idk if your gonna take this seriously but I hope you will because I think alot of players will agree with me

[Freshbakedpie 60]

I really dont get the feeling tanki cares to much about players opinion.  Most things thier doing seems to be to get buyers to buy more crystals.(MUs-buyers will need crystals to get huge adv,(product kits-buyers will buy to get another big adv.

 

if you read then it says to freely express our opinion , but we also have to stick to rules while giving our opinion

[nuclear-bomber 0]

.

Edited December 6, 2013 by nuclear-bomber

[nuclear-bomber 0]

I have a opinion that tanki online developers should create a water map. ;) 

 

Best regards,

Nuclaer-bomber

 

:)  :D 

[nuclear-bomber 0]

:)

Edited December 6, 2013 by nuclear-bomber

[r_DidYouKnowThat0 1,662]

I'm kind of doubtful on this Topic. . .

 

Do our opinions really matter? Lol.

 

Ours meaning English community. . . .