New physics model for tanks

[dardayy 493]

 

 

We did suggest to at least add a refund option of 50% to all items and this choice to be permanent, but nobody answered, its all about just getting more benefits, more customers, and knocking down the old players because they are done with them.

As you said our voices are without any echo. i tried a lot before in suggestions and discussing with some developers and mods, nothing worked. but they say "we listen and read your comments and we are doing what satisfies our players" 

one of them told me to talk in a constructive way, ok whats wrong with adding the choice of 50% refund to any item except bonuses? this can solve the problem of any other future rebalance.

Anyway lets just forget about it, and move forward and looking forward for better changes. 

Be optimistics, its just a game :)

Edited November 26, 2013 by dardayy

[StrahinjA_FDL-PFC 0]

can you tell me what hull the a upgrade

hunter m1 , viking m1 or dictator m1 after

MU ?

[icerugby 1,886]

 

All of those hulls will have an increase in speed compared to what the statistics show now. There will be other changes but noone knows all the details yet. Edited November 26, 2013 by icerugby

[StrahinjA_FDL-PFC 0]

but please the chances we at least say what a tank upgrade hunter m1, m1 dictator, viking m1

[icerugby 1,886]

but please the chances we at least say what a tank upgrade hunter m1, m1 dictator, viking m1

MU's? Well the parameters of each micro-upgrade is unknown as of yet so we don't know how those hulls will change. If you are talking about the chance that a MU will be successful, it will be 100% successful. If you wish to MU something, there will be no chance of failure.

[HEAVY.LOAD 11]

icerugby do u know by any chance which update 196 u getting ready to launch

[icerugby 1,886]

icerugby do u know by any chance which update 196 u getting ready to launch

Noone knows what the update will be, it could be a typical Server Maintenance or it could even be one of these Major updates. Just wait and see :)

[CooperO 7,956]

icerugby do u know by any chance which update 196 u getting ready to launch

http://en.tankiforum.com/index.php?showtopic=184797&do=findComment&comment=3261217 That's what update 196 will be.

[JonathanBernatowicz 119]

http://en.tankiforum.com/index.php?showtopic=184797&do=findComment&comment=3261217 That's what update 196 will be.

+1 (ran out of positive reputation votes :() 

[TheLonelyEpic 212]

http://en.tankiforum.com/index.php?showtopic=184797&do=findComment&comment=3261217 That's what update 196 will be.

Heehee; Hazel had already told some of us before even staff knew. #aheadofthegame

[Playep 355]

Heehee; Hazel had already told some of us before even staff knew. #aheadofthegame

+1 (I too ran out of positive votes)

[Playep 355]

So when is it coming out, since it have error on collision model??

:(

[dardayy 493]

I suggest that this topic to be blocked then to unblock for discussion once the new physics be released, otherwise nobody is certain about the final changes.

Edited November 29, 2013 by dardayy

[Buggati_The_Best 1,233]

Its totally true, yesterday Twins were totally without any push effects and their power were too low, but today their push effects are back to the half of previous, yesterday freeze could kill a titan m3 with 20% anti freeze protection with one load of shooting, Rico m3 isn't the same as rico 2 weeks ago

Rail got more powerful "not exceeding its stats' limits but tending more to its max range of damage"

Anyway nothing is certain and this discussion wont reach a thing until the final physics be released. Tanki will have to make sure that all people get satisfied with the results, but to avoid a refund they came out with the idea of MUs, You will spend crystals on different guns to change certain parameters but not equally the same, e.g. smoky wont have the same chance to increase its fire rate as with thunder

through this they are trying to bring more funds and balance without doing refund, A refund is the right thing to respect the customers, and now i will expect some who pretend to talk in logic to come out with some excuses, and everybody knows why they are doing that.

I will not comment anymore nor reply anyone. our voices are just useless.

about rail part i noticed that!

it does with higher values more often than never!

my wasp m2 got 1 shoot by a rail m3 in like 70% of the shoots!

that is ridiculous for light hull users!

[Buggati_The_Best 1,233]

btw,we want refund :angry:

dont be so greedy tanki..

[ExtremeKiller26 443]

about rail part i noticed that!

it does with higher values more often than never!

my wasp m2 got 1 shoot by a rail m3 in like 70% of the shoots!

that is ridiculous for light hull users!

Actually, it is normal because of the stats.

[Buggati_The_Best 1,233]

Actually, it is normal because of the stats.

if this is normal,i am terrified for my wasp m2 life after phycis :unsure:

[r_NathanPhillis0 0]

:angry: Yeah Right :angry: Start of December :angry: usally means :angry: TEN MILLION YEARS LATER!!!!!! :angry:

 

 

 

:D Third Post ever :D

[TankCommando33 33]

Firstly. I am half a rank away from my turret of choice, twins M3. thanks for wrecking my dream tank. Secondly. Whilst you are messing with tanks please fix Rail gun!!

I am tired of watching the shot miss my tank but still it registers a hit!!. Please make the software more accurate to fix that turret!! Also decrease the rate of critical hits on smoky, make thunder and fire bird  less powerful, do not let isida get health back whilst taking it from opposition, and while you're at it get rid of thunder and ricochets ability to self destruct by shooting at walls!!  If you insist on handicapping twins please keep the rate at M3 and get rid of the stun capacity. This is the only turret i have! and i cannot keep buying more hulls and turrets!! . Otherwise no complaints

I hate when rail does that to me!!! Yes,PLEASE fix Railgun back to it's best shape!!! Otherwise all I am waiting for is MOs to come out and for these new physics!

[JonathanBernatowicz 119]

btw,we want refund :angry:

dont be so greedy tanki..

It's not about being greedy, they're actually "looking out for us". A refund would cause another Update 123, which absolutely Nobody liked, and there would be many technical problems.

[vanshajwore 324]

It's not about being greedy, they're actually "looking out for us". A refund would cause another Update 123, which absolutely Nobody liked, and there would be many technical problems.

how would it cause another update 123? Can you please explain me? rebalance and refund both were good and update 123 was bad but how would be a refund cause harm?

[icerugby 1,886]

how would it cause another update 123? Can you please explain me? rebalance and refund both were good and update 123 was bad but how would be a refund cause harm?

The first rebalance that took place on December of last year, caused the economy of Tanki to plummet due to the refunding of all players. Because of this, update 123 (x10 to all numerical values) was implemented to balance out the economy. If we have another refund, it is likely that the same thing should happen again, and this isn't the only problem with refunding all players. There are technical barriers that pose a problem as well.

Edited November 28, 2013 by icerugby

[JonathanBernatowicz 119]

The first rebalance that took place on December of last year, caused the economy of Tanki to plummet due to the refunding of all players. Because of this, update 123 (x10 to all numerical values) was implemented to balance out the economy. If we have another refund, it is likely that the same thing should happen again, and this isn't the only problem with refunding all players. There are technical barriers that pose a problem as well.

+1

[Nltobh 498]

Um, you guys must have missed my question.

 

Are the new physics what the test server is running At the moment?

[Playep 355]

^Obviously NO. Maybe you can check it if its open, because the hulls status is the same of main server.

'the hulls will have an increase in speed' By icerugby on the previous page.

Edited November 29, 2013 by Playep