Should paints be so overpowered?

[jordan61 120]

Paints are ruining some of the gameplay.Beacause of paints thunder is a bad gun .Paints with mu should have a maximum of 30%protection against specific guns.What do you think?

[Piety 70]

Paints are ruining some of the gameplay.Beacause of paints thunder is a bad gun .Paints with mu should have a maximum of 30%protection against specific guns.What do you think?

Lol good paint cost a lot.

 

It is balanced. A inferno paint does 40 and 30 against freeze and firebird but that means it's vulnerable to a thunder and smoky becuase it does not have protection against that.

 

Also, emerald has protection against the most vursatile thunder but then it lacks protection if a deadly freeze and a firebird which is very strong.

[thelastremnant 120]

i you're right jordan61 as when MU's will be released paints sould be abled to upgrade to max 30 %, or guns would be abled to upgrade to nearly M6 as if not, imagine -- MU'graded Mammoth ~~~420 hp with protection from rail---50% and drugging--not even 10 rail M3's wont kill such ( i'm not mentioning other guns if he will have same amount of protection-

1. Thunder becomes useless

2. Smoky too

3. No more gold boxes for small tanks

4.  Mammoths will gain most use of DA powr-ap

5. This certanly doesn't look good

  :mellow: upseeeeeeeeeeeeet

Edited November 15, 2013 by thelastremnant

[joostcool 5,942]

Nice one, paints have never seemed op to me. Just because every weapon is represented in paints. I don't think er should change anything about the paints. That makes me afraid for the MUs, because I wont be able to see how many % protection someone has.

[Dark-Rim 183]

Paints are ruining some of the gameplay.Beacause of paints thunder is a bad gun .Paints with mu should have a maximum of 30%protection against specific guns.What do you think?

Tanki wont do anything about it. they never do. you minus well just buy a paint yourself to combat against your problem.

[SlLVER 12]

Generalissimos could MU zeus to make it 50% from 3 hated weapons :/

[r_NatsuDragneeI0 67]

Generalissimos could MU zeus to make it 50% from 3 hated weapons :/

YES. That is why Zeus is amazing. 

50% Freeze

50% Smoky

50% Firebird

hhhhh

[SlLVER 12]

YES. That is why Zeus is amazing. 

50% Freeze

50% Smoky

50% Firebird

hhhhh

hhhh ikr, also the effects of these 3 (burning, freezing, critical hits) gets less and goes away faster than normal -__-

[Finnshaman 5]

Lol good paint cost a lot.

 

It is balanced. A inferno paint does 40 and 30 against freeze and firebird but that means it's vulnerable to a thunder and smoky becuase it does not have protection against that.

 

Also, emerald has protection against the most vursatile thunder but then it lacks protection if a deadly freeze and a firebird which is very strong.

Listen to your words.. you call it balanced? Still, I love my "Moon" because it stands out, even if it´s only effective against Bolts. You may spend a lot of money for dye protection, still you end up not nowhere near satisfied.

I prefer stealth+movement over paint:)

[icerugby 1,886]

Paints provide a variation in gameplay within the game and the paints with higher protections are the ones that provide this, especially because a player has to think strategically before entering a battle. Paints can also be used to express yourself as a unique player, different from others which is probably why there are a variety of paints and colours.

Edited November 16, 2013 by icerugby

[T-0-M-0 10]

on my higher account I always put some crys away for paint sales and I don't agree about the 30% only there part of the game

[Irontank1v 836]

Paints provide a variation in gameplay within the game and the paints with higher protections are the ones that provide this, especially because a player has to think strategically before entering a battle. Paints can also be used to express yourself as a unique player, different from others which is probably why there are a variety of paints and colours.

And don't forget that if paints can be MUed so can your hulls and turrets 

[Remaine 4,687]

i you're right jordan61 as when MU's will be released paints sould be abled to upgrade to max 30 %, or guns would be abled to upgrade to nearly M6 as if not, imagine -- MU'graded Mammoth ~~~420 hp with protection from rail---50% and drugging--not even 10 rail M3's wont kill such ( i'm not mentioning other guns if he will have same amount of protection-

1. Thunder becomes useless

2. Smoky too

3. No more gold boxes for small tanks

4.  Mammoths will gain most use of DA powr-ap

5. This certanly doesn't look good

  :mellow: upseeeeeeeeeeeeet

lol no

[thelastremnant 120]

lol no

i mean that there is

1 offense in game--- guns

2 defese in game--- paints,hulls

if it's without paints,it is the same as weapons will be abled to upgrade to m4 while hulls till m6

so funds of battles will grow less often as there will be less kills because tanks will be fighting each other longer.

 

DO you understabd what i mean ??????????????

 

imagine two mammoths with thunders each has 50 % protect. against thunder and are micro upgraded--- about 450 hp

these will fight themselves for minutes

and lets not forget if they will drug and use F.A.K.'s (its a supply,not swearword devs)

Edited November 16, 2013 by thelastremnant

[Eragon 13,876]

Even a 50% paint against a gun will not protect it a wasp against the rail

[Remaine 4,687]

I'm laughing at the fact you called it M6 because that's such a stupid exaggeration.