Who locked this + why?

[SlLVER 12]

http://en.tankiforum.com/index.php?showtopic=184424

Why and who would lock this topic without showing himself?

The discussion was still going..

[ChuckNorris2090 102]

Huh, I didn't even notice it got locked... :unsure:

[MusicJam19 737]

Because the OP said not to close it until he gets an answer from a Dev

Hazel answered, topic closed

You dont need to know who closed it

[SlLVER 12]

No, I did not say that, read the topic again, I said 'Moderators, do not act as if you can answer as I want an official answer from a developer' not 'close this after I get an answer from a moderator'

And you couldn't see the last post on that topic? It is very obvious that the discussion was still going.

Yes I do need the nickname of the one who locked it.

[canadarules 1,938]

who would close this

http://en.tankiforum.com/index.php?showtopic=182862&hl=

 

 

......everyone liked it XD

[SlLVER 12]

I didn't make this topic because of the fact that people liked my topic, but because the discussion was still going, the moderators have no right to close a topic that do not break the rules unless by the OP request.

Was wondering why the mod did not show himself and typed a good reason to close -_-

[Irontank1v 836]

Who locked the topic? Does it really matter.
Why was it locked? Because a Dev was answering your questions and you instead of understanding it was trying to start an argument. And the main reason of it getting closed was that your question was Answered  <--- Hope you can see that.

Edited November 26, 2013 by Irontank1v

[Lankbouv 6,347]

Who locked the topic? Does it really matter.

Why was it locked? Because a Dev was answering your questions and you instead of understanding it was trying to start an argument. And the main reason of it getting closed was that your question was Answered  <--- Hope you can see that.

Irontank, seriously?  He still had questions left, despite OP saying close when a Dev has answered, if there are questions still to be answered it shouldn't be locked.  That is why this forum fails.

[MusicJam19 737]

No, I did not say that, read the topic again, I said 'Moderators, do not act as if you can answer as I want an official answer from a developer' not 'close this after I get an answer from a moderator'

And you couldn't see the last post on that topic? It is very obvious that the discussion was still going.

Yes I do need the nickname of the one who locked it.

Mod's do no close this topic / show that you could answer in a way as I want an OFFICIAL answer from a developer, Thank you.

 

Read what I said again

Hazel-Rah is a game designer, and he answered your question

[Irontank1v 836]

Irontank, seriously?  He still had questions left, despite OP saying close when a Dev has answered, if there are questions still to be answered it shouldn't be locked.  That is why this forum fails.

http://en.tankiforum.com/index.php?showtopic=184424&p=3258601. Read and tell me how this question is going to help anyone. And such questions and arguments are the reason why forum fails.

[Lankbouv 6,347]

http://en.tankiforum.com/index.php?showtopic=184424&p=3258601. Read and tell me how this question is going to help anyone. And such questions and arguments are the reason why forum fails.

Er...he still had questions at the end of that topic

 

also, mister_G and Fbi, please stop upvoting irontank's comments just because he is a mod *facepalm*

[Lankbouv 6,347]

Read what I said again

Hazel-Rah is a game designer, and he answered your question

And, do stop being a mini mod

[q456wert 18]

Er...he still had questions at the end of that topic

 

also, mister_G and Fbi, please stop upvoting irontank's comments just because he is a mod *facepalm*

just downvote em

lol ninja post

Edited November 26, 2013 by q456wert

[FederalBureauFBI 2,881]

I didn't make this topic because of the fact that people liked my topic, but because the discussion was still going, the moderators have no right to close a topic that do not break the rules unless by the OP request.

Was wondering why the mod did not show himself and typed a good reason to close -_-

It really does not look nice to make statements when you aren't 100% sure. The topic was closed by Opex (Hazel), why - because he answered the commands question completely - commands get enabled when and if devs need or want to, asking this would just get you the same answer - so that's why the topic was closed, if you don't like it feel free to talk to .

And by the way:

 

2. - The following activities are not permitted and will result in (at Administration discretion) a temporary or permanent suspension from the chat and forum:

2.18. - public discussion of moderation as well as Administration' activities.

===

3. - It is also prohibited to create new forum threads and posts that:

3.8. - Continue discussing topics that have been locked or deleted by the Administration. To contact the Administration, use Private Messages;

 

 

Irontank, seriously?  He still had questions left, despite OP saying close when a Dev has answered, if there are questions still to be answered it shouldn't be locked.

Er...he still had questions at the end of that topic

Questions? Asking (again) why exactly commands weren't enabled in xx update, does xx update need commands, etc.

All of this was perfectly answered by Rah - commands are enabled when devs need/want to - nothing more to discuss about it, those who want to try to get more info about it - PM

 

That is why this forum fails.

Then I see no point of staying here.

 

also, mister_G and Fbi, please stop upvoting irontank's comments just because he is a mod *facepalm*

We live in a free world, facepalm as much as you want :) And for the same reason we'll use voting system as much as we want :)

 

And, do stop being a mini mod

He's a Consultant candidate, trying to explain why the topic was locked. Call him "minimod" if you like :)

 

 

 

As for this topic here:

• 2 rules broken
• answered

So, thread closed.