Overrated turrets/hulls

[RedMenace 112]

Ok so I made this to discuss what I think are the most overrated weapons and tanks and I think they are

1. thunder
2. railgun

3. freeze

 

and

1. hornet

 

[HirunMeepage 763]

This topic must be moved to the Gameplay section.

Discussions about Turrets/Hulls should be done there.

[lordmostafa 3,821]

congrat for ur rank up redmenace

[Remaine 4,687]

Smoky.

[sam131192 113]

Railgun, seriously?

[Smok-Ti-Thun 93]

This topic will simply lead to nowhere.

[Cindershock 2]

This topic will simply lead to nowhere.

And you dictating it will only contribute to that, which is not what we want.

[kipk49 10]

Over-rated or over-powered?

[Smok-Ti-Thun 93]

And you dictating it will only contribute to that, which is not what we want.

Remaine sad, just sad: http://en.tankiforum.com/index.php?showtopic=175771&do=findComment&comment=3013524

 

Even more: http://en.tankiforum.com/index.php?showtopic=174263&page=54&do=findComment&comment=3014202

 

If you have something to say, do it under the name Remaine. I already thought that

I recognized the "trolling" tone.

I wasn 't wrong about you after all it seems.

Edited February 16, 2014 by Smok-Ti-Thun

[Remaine 4,687]

You've never done silly things before? You think that outing that is going to render my point invalid? It's actually quite pathetic that you have to resort to that because you have no argument.

 

EDIT: I'll use what account I want to speak. You don't dictate to me what account I use to post. I like how you seem to think I'm still a troll now. I also like how you did your research on me. I guess Revilo was right - you do have too much time on your hands... I'll leave you with those thoughts.

Edited February 16, 2014 by Remaine

[Smok-Ti-Thun 93]

You've never done silly things before? You think that outing that is going to render my point invalid? It's actually quite pathetic that you have to resort to that because you have no argument.

Well I won 't use and do not need multiple accounts to hide my true self behind, that 's just sad IMO.

 

If you have something to say about or against me do it like you do it now.

And I won 't react to your last quite pathetic "no argument" reaction.

 

End of discussion.

 

p.s. is "Khantan" one of your multiple account as well?: http://en.tankiforum.com/index.php?showtopic=180349&page=268&do=findComment&comment=3405936

Edited February 16, 2014 by Smok-Ti-Thun

[Smok-Ti-Thun 93]

You've never done silly things before? You think that outing that is going to render my point invalid? It's actually quite pathetic that you have to resort to that because you have no argument.

 

EDIT: I'll use what account I want to speak. You don't dictate to me what account I use to post. I like how you seem to think I'm still a troll now. I also like how you did your research on me. I guess Revilo was right - you do have too much time on your hands... I'll leave you with those thoughts.

I just outsmart you my friend, that 's all! :D

[Remaine 4,687]

Well I won 't use and do not need multiple accounts to hide my true self behind, that 's just sad IMO.

 

If you have something to say about or against me do it like you do it now.

And I won 't react to your last quite pathetic "no argument" reaction.

 

End of discussion.

 

p.s. is "Khantan" one of your multiple account as well?: http://en.tankiforum.com/index.php?showtopic=180349&page=268&do=findComment&comment=3405936

In what way is it pathetic? I think it's perfectly legit and I'll tell you why. Rather than responding to me as such, you try to embarrass me and you know that's what you're trying to do. Otherwise, why else would you reveal my past? If anything, "that's just said IMO." As I've told you before, if you have something to say about me negatively, tell me in a PM rather than derailing a thread. Not up for that?

 

Granted, what I did in the past wasn't exactly smart and it's not the way I am today to an extent, but I don't think you can be calling anyone pathetic if your attempt at an argument is trying to out me as something I once was.

 

NOW it's the end of discussion unless you want to carry on - I'll assume you don't. And if you think you're outsmarting me with this, you're delusional. Perhaps it could be more legitimate in other situations but all you've done is bring up irrelevant things and you know you have - you choose to be ignorant to it.

Edited February 16, 2014 by Remaine

[Smok-Ti-Thun 93]

In what way is it pathetic? I think it's perfectly legit and I'll tell you why. Rather than responding to me as such, you try to embarrass me and you know that's what you're trying to do. Otherwise, why else would you reveal my past? If anything, "that's just said IMO."

 

Granted, what I did in the past wasn't exactly smart and it's not the way I am today to an extent, but I don't think you can be calling anyone pathetic if your attempt at an argument is trying to out me as something I once was.

 

NOW it's the end of discussion unless you want to carry on - I'll assume you don't. And if you think you're outsmarting me with this, you're delusional. Perhaps it could be more legitimate in other situations but all you've done is bring up irrelevant things and you know you have - you choose to be ignorant to it.

Ok lets carry on. Hopefully it will lead to an end of this endless returning issue we seem to have with each other.

 

You say that I try to embarrass you. Not my intention: you started it yourself by letting "Cindershock",which is you, say: "And you dictating it

will only contribute to that, which is not what we want."

 

In that sentence is a trolling personal aspect, you want to get a reaction. I recognized the tone and a quick survey on "Cindershock" brought

me to you in just five minutes. Yep, I got to much time on my hands.

A sentence which Revilo indeed said to me but is out of the context, because that related to me playing those long DM battles,

which you did as well to my surprise: so we both seem to have too much time on our hands don 't we?

 

"As I've told you before, if you have something to say about me negatively, tell me in a PM rather than derailing a thread. Not up for that?"

 

I am perfectly up for that. And the first time I was sorry, but only to discover that you are very often negative towards others on this forum,

true or not? I can be negative on a topic, I won 't deny that, but I do not get personal.

 

So why do you who gets personal very often expect other people to behave differently than you do yourself?

And my intention when I had that first discussion with you, was not to embarrass you or "damage" you. I said it out of good intentions,

whether you believe that or not.

 

As I said before, many times already, but you simply won 't hear it (till now?): I believe you are intelligent, have very sharp insights in your longer reactions on this forum, but there is also a part of you that likes to "pick a fight". And in some way I seem to trigger you.

 

But again everything above is most probably irrelevant, without argument etc. OR can we just be guys playing Tanki Online and having good on-topic discussions on the forum. I already long ago choose the latter, and I really hope you will follow some day soon.

 

If you still want to PM with me, I am open for it.

[Guest]

This topic has gone too far off-topic. Next time resolve your issues using PMs.

 

 

Closed.