Open testing of changes in balance

[crackgold2 399]

Don't you guys think that Freeze is a bit OP?

i havent tested the new one but the current freez is way too much op

[I.D0M 601]

Why are people so ignorant and flood about the refund... JUST SHUT UP!!!

[HirunMeepage 763]

i havent tested the new one but the current freez is way too much op

Yes, I am talking about the current one and my suggestion is that it must be a little adjusted.

[HirunMeepage 763]

Hazel-Rah are you GodMode_ON, Because I Went To Your Profile and Saw Your "About Me" Pic.

It was a part of the THE GAME contest, and has still not being removed. But still, Who Knows...

[FreshbakedpieTO 111]

Test is closed.

[atomicbomb2 32]

Well done tanki, dictator is basically a titan now, and I have no idea what hull to buy for the next sale.Dictator was what I wanted but now.... :'(

[Uliuliu2 7]

Lots of words about refund and only few lines of actual feedback. It seems to me that this community does not really care about game and its balance, but only for their beloved numbers in the garage tables.

 

Most funny thing is about refund — last time this game did a refund all prices was significantly increased and nobody could buy in garage same things they use to have. I find this hilarious that you guys keep asking to do the same horrible thing while you have a chance of a better game with what you have. You kinda do not seem to understand that digits in garage tables are not all that important. What is important is actual gameplay. That could be bad thing to do, but it looks like changing parametrs without changing them in garage will satisfy you. Oddly enough, you will like this because 'on paper' nothing will change but gamplay will be much better.

 

I ask you for feedback. If I am not going to get one then I am not going to listen for you in the future.

what you cant understand and what all the people are saying - we dont want the changes. If they will appear, theyre so dissatisfying that we want our hardly earned crystals back in order to change our now useless turrets and hulls into something that was once horrible, but now will actually be good.

Asking for a refund is feedback. People wouldnt do that if the changes actually seemed good for them.

 

Is this clear?

[Opex-Rah 5,375]

what you cant understand and what all the people are saying - we dont want the changes. If they will appear, theyre so dissatisfying that we want our hardly earned crystals back in order to change our now useless turrets and hulls into something that was once horrible, but now will actually be good.

Asking for a refund is feedback. People wouldnt do that if the changes actually seemed good for them.

 

Is this clear?

We will change this game the way we see it needed to be changed. And nothing is going to be useless therefore we will never do a refund. Never.

 

Is this clear?

[Meliora 1,652]

We will change this game the way we see it needed to be changed. And nothing is going to be useless therefore we will never do a refund. Never.

 

Nothing's going to be useless? In whose opinion, yours, or the people who actually play the game? For goodness' sake.

[Uliuliu2 7]

what you cant understand and what all the people are saying - we dont want the changes. If they will appear, theyre so dissatisfying that we want our hardly earned crystals back in order to change our now useless turrets and hulls into something that was once horrible, but now will actually be good.

Asking for a refund is feedback. People wouldnt do that if the changes actually seemed good for them.

 

Is this clear?

This doesnt apply to buyers, cause theyll have an advantage battleing against people who will either have to play with weak turrets and hulls, or try to battle with strong ones, but with worse modifications, cause they wont have enough crystals to buy anything useful without getting a refund.

[Uliuliu2 7]

We will change this game the way we see it needed to be changed. And nothing is going to be useless therefore we will never do a refund. Never.

 

Is this clear?

The thing you made clear is that you dont listen to the players. "the way we see it needed to be changed". Why do you even ask for our opinion then? Its not like youre going to do anything that we players want.

[Opex-Rah 5,375]

Nothing's going to be useless? In whose opinion, yours, or the people who actually play the game? For goodness' sake.

Your opinion is shown in statistics well enough. As we see it you keep saying that everything is fine, but most of the gear in garage is just not used.

You voted for this change with your wallet, so to speek.

 

So yeah, we will make weapons in game not useless in our opinion. Nobody will listen to people who do one thing, saying they do the other.

[Meliora 1,652]

Your opinion is shown in statistics well enough. As we see it you keep saying that everything is fine, but most of the gear in garage is just not used.

You voted for this change with your wallet, so to speak.

 

So yeah, we will make weapons in game not useless in our opinion. Nobody will listen to people who do one thing, saying they do the other.

I don't see any vote, and statistics where?

[Opex-Rah 5,375]

Why do you even ask for our opinion then?

I am asking for your opinion on balance. But you don't care about balance.

In this case this topic is really got nothing to do here.

[Meliora 1,652]

Nobody will listen to people who do one thing, saying they do the other.

Hang on, what about Update 123, we thought everything would be the same but the funds went down...?

Bit confused about that statement.

[Opex-Rah 5,375]

Bit confused about that statement.

Didn't work here at that time. I was an avarage tester.

 

Today we are open to show you what we are going to do. What we get in return? Well. You don't care. All you need is to keep things as they are. Good way to kill this game, people.

[Opex-Rah 5,375]

If you ask me what happen in 2012 and in the beginning of 2013 I say it was horrible. And I keep calling it that way as you can see it in my posts.

We are changing they way we treat our players.

But for know, you are not supporting it in any way. This can end-up badly.

[Meliora 1,652]

But for know, you are not supporting it in any way. This can end-up badly.

Oh great, blame any failure on the players because we don't like the idea.

[Opex-Rah 5,375]

And yeah. We need feedback, but we are not going to do exactly as you say.

Rules are simple — you can make an influence, but you will never decide how this game will change.

 

I ask you to take part in game balance to make it better. You say we need to do this only the way you like it.

Not going to happen.

[vanshajwore 324]

i understand that you want to make gameplay more interesting, but you have made some mistakes which is most likely hated by some people, like hornet users.

If i knew that ricochet was going to become stonger, i would have definately bought it, and not isida or freeze. you also weakened hornet (which was balanced enough), which was quite popular for its speed and armour, and what you did? you just lowered its armour, thus people now dont want hornet.. so think about people of ranks like second lt., who saved their crystals hardly to have a balanced hull (hornet) and now they will regret i, now they will prefer other hulls like hunter. also viking needs more weight, i bought viking so that nobody could push me easily (especially, when gold is dropping above me and some few tanks are trying to push me), but now it can be pushed a bit easily.

buyers have nothing to care about, as they will just buy more crystals and get the guns which are better with the new chracteristics..

That is why most of the community wants a refund, and what is wrong if refund happens? i remember you said that there is a risk of implementing and update like 123. now i want to tell you that there is no risk of it IMO. solution is easy, just dont do update 123, as no 123=no problem. OR if you must update the economics in order to run the game, then just don't lie like before. last time you just increased the funds by 50% (which made tanki worse, no fault of update 123) instead of 100%. if you do it again, then just make sure then you are not going to lie, and do as promised... also as many people said, please add a poll if they want a refund or not

Edited April 15, 2014 by vanshajwore

[DanTheKiller1 2,889]

Before doing such updates better check what community thinks

 

[N.o.6.o.d.y 575]

Worst update by far.. they make a rebalance to realise its unfair so they make a second rebalance and they don't even refund.. is this the same tanki we all love?

[MisterGeneral 692]

Great update, fixed many annoying differences between some guns and hulls, good job. 

[MentallyDeranged 740]

Great update, fixed many annoying differences between some guns and hulls, good job. 

Completely wrong as there isn't any refund here too! <_< -_-

Edited April 15, 2014 by MentallyDeranged

[thunder114 6]

I don't understand why so many people want a refund - clearly they don't read all the comments as Hazel clearly stated that there will not be a refund, and I agree that there should not be one for I think that this update will make everything more balanced - for example, Rico was often at a disadvantage when facing a Twins user, because the Twins has unlimited ammo while Rico doesn't. Therefore, the Devs increased Rico's damage per shot and decreased Twins' by a little, so it is far more balanced. The same goes for everything else. So the flooding about having a refund needs to stop. Rant over. (This is because it is irritating seeing so many people asking for a refund or whether will be one when it has been said many times that there will not be one).