My YouTube news - I need help!

[MentallyDeranged 740]

Goodluck,I think i done mine.

[emrakul 7,801]

we are with you

already, signed

[r_Contaminator0 10]

"This account has been terminated due to repeated or severe violations of our Community Guidelines and/or claims of copyright infringement. " - petition

 

So, you either used copyrighted music, or didn't have Tanki Online's permission to use a certain thing in this game.

[GoldRock 6,165]

"This account has been terminated due to repeated or severe violations of our Community Guidelines and/or claims of copyright infringement. " - petition

 

So, you either used copyrighted music, or didn't have Tanki Online's permission to use a certain thing in this game.

Look - if that was true, then Raph wouldn't have set up this petition.

 

Raphael has checked on multiple occasions, and he's not used any copyrighted music. He's also checking this with his sponsor, Machinima, who would have more than enough experience in the matter. As for having Tanki's permission, any player would be allowed to create videos on any aspect of the game - it's only when the videos are used to earn large amounts of money that there could be a problem. And I can assure you that this isn't the case.

 

Rather than assuming that Youtube must be right, I'm sure Raph would appreciate support in trying to convince them otherwise. Youtube have made similar mistakes in the past. If you're here to tell Raphael what he must have done wrong, then you're wasting your words - considering it's his channel, don't you think he might just have already checked all of that before setting up this petition?

[r_Contaminator0 10]

Look - if that was true, then Raph wouldn't have set up this petition.

 

Raphael has checked on multiple occasions, and he's not used any copyrighted music. He's also checking this with his sponsor, Machinima, who would have more than enough experience in the matter. As for having Tanki's permission, any player would be allowed to create videos on any aspect of the game - it's only when the videos are used to earn large amounts of money that there could be a problem. And I can assure you that this isn't the case.

 

Rather than assuming that Youtube must be right, I'm sure Raph would appreciate support in trying to convince them otherwise. Youtube have made similar mistakes in the past. If you're here to tell Raphael what he must have done wrong, then you're wasting your words - considering it's his channel, don't you think he might just have already checked all of that before setting up this petition?

Why are you bringing his sponsor into this? They have nothing to do with why his account was flagged for something, he did something offensive or used copyrighted material. I doubt a petition would change anything, let alone, re-open his banned account on a video sharing website, he would be flagged for a good reason, and YouTube knows what they are doing.

 

In short, YouTube knows what they are doing, and they did the correct thing in this manner.

[Kata891 12]

Why are you bringing his sponsor into this? They have nothing to do with why his account was flagged for something, he did something offensive or used copyrighted material. I doubt a petition would change anything, let alone, re-open his banned account on a video sharing website, he would be flagged for a good reason, and YouTube knows what they are doing.

 

In short, YouTube knows what they are doing, and they did the correct thing in this manner.

What he's saying, though, is that he never was told what he did wrong. Just that he had a copyright issue, and one day, his account is gone!

[GoldRock 6,165]

Why are you bringing his sponsor into this? They have nothing to do with why his account was flagged for something, he did something offensive or used copyrighted material. I doubt a petition would change anything, let alone, re-open his banned account on a video sharing website, he would be flagged for a good reason, and YouTube knows what they are doing.

 

In short, YouTube knows what they are doing, and they did the correct thing in this manner.

Because it would seem that if Raphael missed the point at which he was offensive/used copyrighted material, and so the fact that his sponsors are also unable to pick up on point would make it seem as though that point doesn't exist.

 

Do you know how easy it is to flag a video/series of videos? All I'd need to do would be to fill out a short form - and clearly, someone decided to flag multiple videos of Raphael's, whether correctly or not. As for setting up a petition, it's not like Raph hasn't done his research; it turns out there have been similar cases of people's accounts being unfairly terminated in the past, and in those cases, and open letter/petition were key in grabbing Youtube's attention and getting the accounts back. As for doubting whether petitions can have any effect, I seem to find that assertion rather amusing, and unworthy of response. Go watch the news more.

 

In short, it's not your place to assert that Youtube must be correct here, especially when you don't even know much about this situation. Your comments here are not appreciated.

[shadewarttt 3,350]

Does this iPetition service have any relation/connection to youtube? I am worried that this will not reach Youtube's ears...

[GoldRock 6,165]

Does this iPetition service have any relation/connection to youtube? I am worried that this will not reach Youtube's ears...

No, it doesn't. However, once the petition's mustered enough support/momentum, the next step for Raphael would probably be to do just that - to bring it to the attention of Youtube. So yeah, I'm sure Raph'll do his best to make sure it reaches Youtube's ears, which shouldn't be too hard to do.

Edited May 23, 2014 by GoldRock

[123CHECKER123 0]

Poor Raphael2 :(

[Relate 714]

You have 3K subs but only 214 signed. Maybe try posting this in Russian and German section too? 

[Royalworld 1,269]

After signing petition, a donation option comes. How do i know if my response is recorded or not. It say so but i don't see increase in signatures.

Good luck raph on getting your account back.

[I.EatMyBullets 497]

 

Signed. Good luck in getting it back

 

[azmain123 1]

How do I sign but I told all my friends

[hhgb 2,655]

Because it would seem that if Raphael missed the point at which he was offensive/used copyrighted material, and so the fact that his sponsors are also unable to pick up on point would make it seem as though that point doesn't exist.

 

Do you know how easy it is to flag a video/series of videos? All I'd need to do would be to fill out a short form - and clearly, someone decided to flag multiple videos of Raphael's, whether correctly or not. As for setting up a petition, it's not like Raph hasn't done his research; it turns out there have been similar cases of people's accounts being unfairly terminated in the past, and in those cases, and open letter/petition were key in grabbing Youtube's attention and getting the accounts back. As for doubting whether petitions can have any effect, I seem to find that assertion rather amusing, and unworthy of response. Go watch the news more.

 

In short, it's not your place to assert that Youtube must be correct here, especially when you don't even know much about this situation. Your comments here are not appreciated.

 

 

You can't assume that he knows nothing.

 

A power like Youtube won't listen to a small community doing a petition to give someone's account back, they probably terminated all of his files anyways. they would just remove a video if there was something bad in just one of them, but this problem must have been in most of his videos, and must have been something about the content being used in it that was inappropriate, and seemingly would not cause a problem to most people.

 

Youtube checks several times before deciding anything, and must have been more than a single person to flag content for this to happen, and should have carried on over several videos.

 

Youtube is a multi-billion dollar partner of the Google search engine, and they know everything that is right and wrong.

Edited May 24, 2014 by hhgb

[ExtremeKiller26 443]

You can't assume that he knows nothing.

 

A power like Youtube won't listen to a small community doing a petition to give someone's account back, they probably terminated all of his files anyways. they would just remove a video if there was something bad in just one of them, but this problem must have been in most of his videos, and must have been something about the content being used in it that was inappropriate, and seemingly would not cause a problem to most people.

 

Youtube checks several times before deciding anything, and must have been more than a single person to flag content for this to happen, and should have carried on over several videos.

 

Youtube is a multi-billion dollar partner of the Google search engine, and they know everything that is right and wrong.

But then, I am sure humans work there, and it isn't like if humans work at a multi-billion dollar company, they won't make a mistake.

[GoldRock 6,165]

You can't assume that he knows nothing.

If you look at the bit that you yourself underlined, that is not what I assumed.

 

A power like Youtube won't listen to a small community doing a petition to give someone's account back, they probably terminated all of his files anyways. they would just remove a video if there was something bad in just one of them, but this problem must have been in most of his videos, and must have been something about the content being used in it that was inappropriate, and seemingly would not cause a problem to most people.

 

Youtube checks several times before deciding anything, and must have been more than a single person to flag content for this to happen, and should have carried on over several videos.

There seems to be a large logical problem here. You seem to be saying that Youtube will have taken great care over terminating his small-ish account, but would ignore those who have complaints over it!

 

I'm glad Youtube doesn't follow your business model, otherwise they'd be bankrupt within a very, very short time.

 

It is very likely that Youtube may only have given the case of Raphael's account to one of its employees, considering the account's size. It is also likely that therefore, they really wouldn't have taken much care over the case. Consequently, it wouldn't be too hard for that one employee to make a mistake in this paritcular case.

 

As for getting the account back, I assume that Youtube is more likely to listen to a complaint than it would have been to take lots of care over Raph's case. After all, it has a reputation to look after.

 

So basically, it really is quite logically flawed to say that Youtube will have been very careful about terminating Raph's small-ish account. At best, they didn't take much care when terminating it, and they'll care if the petition is brought to their notice. At worst, they didn't take much care when terminating it, and they won't care if the petition is brought to their notice.

 

Youtube is a multi-billion dollar partner of the Google search engine, and they know everything that is right and wrong.

PM me if you wish to have a debate over that (we can call it "Is Google God on Earth?"), though I think EK26 got the right idea about that - Google is a company operated by people, and people can make mistakes. Why else do you think that major companies always have some sort of department for managing complaints/appeals?

[MASTEROFALLTANKS2 1]

signed i hope you get it back i know a lot of friends i told them and 40 of them signed already good luck bro i hope you get it back  ;)

[bezdela 184]

Signed hope it gets fixed

[MASTEROFALLTANKS2 1]

semyon need to sign :P and the rest of tanki staff that would be a big help for you bro :D

[blackopspaul 753]

goodluck ralp

[hhgb 2,655]

If you look at the bit that you yourself underlined, that is not what I assumed.

 

 

There seems to be a large logical problem here. You seem to be saying that Youtube will have taken great care over terminating his small-ish account, but would ignore those who have complaints over it!

 

I'm glad Youtube doesn't follow your business model, otherwise they'd be bankrupt within a very, very short time.

 

It is very likely that Youtube may only have given the case of Raphael's account to one of its employees, considering the account's size. It is also likely that therefore, they really wouldn't have taken much care over the case. Consequently, it wouldn't be too hard for that one employee to make a mistake in this paritcular case.

 

As for getting the account back, I assume that Youtube is more likely to listen to a complaint than it would have been to take lots of care over Raph's case. After all, it has a reputation to look after.

 

So basically, it really is quite logically flawed to say that Youtube will have been very careful about terminating Raph's small-ish account. At best, they didn't take much care when terminating it, and they'll care if the petition is brought to their notice. At worst, they didn't take much care when terminating it, and they won't care if the petition is brought to their notice.

 

 

PM me if you wish to have a debate over that (we can call it "Is Google God on Earth?"), though I think EK26 got the right idea about that - Google is a company operated by people, and people can make mistakes. Why else do you think that major companies always have some sort of department for managing complaints/appeals?

I am afraid your business model is more corrupt, and just by looking at what a person writes does not mean you can assume he knows nothing, so you clearly did assume that fact about the user.

 

No, Google is not "God on Earth" and do you think they would hire someone that doesn't know the correct way to deal with this situation? The people making the decision about this person's account would check with someone else before performing the action against the user.

 

 

You are just writing a wall of text to escalate this argument and try scare me off with your "business skills" that don't exist and probably bringing someone in to make you feel better. You are not going to get far with the technique in your life, you are trying to make yourself look superior against others, when you really are not making things better.

[SonofDeath 512]

I am afraid your business model is more corrupt, and just by looking at what a person writes does not mean you can assume he knows nothing, so you clearly did assume that fact about the user.

 

No, Google is not "God on Earth" and do you think they would hire someone that doesn't know the correct way to deal with this situation? The people making the decision about this person's account would check with someone else before performing the action against the user.

 

 

You are just writing a wall of text to escalate this argument and try scare me off with your "business skills" that don't exist and probably bringing someone in to make you feel better. You are not going to get far with the technique in your life, you are trying to make yourself look superior against others, when you really are not making things better.

Youtube probably has millions of videos flagged everyday. However they do not have millions of employees who spent the entire day looking at these videos. 

So it is a logical assumption that a mistake was made (due to the reasons listed by Goldrock)

 

And remember raph is not saying that youtube was wrong in this, he just wants an explanation.

And if there is no explanation, then most likely a mistake was made. 

[hhgb 2,655]

And if there is no explanation, then most likely a mistake was made. 

Explain the flags

[tenkdestroyer 10]

I did, and shared on Facebook... and here is my YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6D5sCLqvQAZuC2ZQNvXEag/videos